Abstract
Biological effects of plastic film mulching on rice production were studied in the field experiment in rain-fed area in Chuanxi plain.The results showed that the rice growth under plastic film mulching was more exuberant at the early transplanting stage compared with conventional cultivation.The tiller number,leaf area and root biomass of rice under plastic film mulching were higher than that in conventional cultivation,while heading stage was put off for 3 days.And leaf vitality under traditional treatment was premature aging in contrast with plastic film mulching.Therefore,rice plastic film mulching cultivation was an efficient technology.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Rice growth under plastic film mulching was more exuberant at the early transplanting stage than under conventional cultivation.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae1 - Organ / stage
- early transplanting stagee1
- Treatment
- plastic film mulchinge1
- Outcome
- rice growthe1
- Direction
- more exuberante1
- Comparator
- conventional cultivatione1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“the rice growth under plastic film mulching was more exuberant at the early transplanting stage compared with conventional cultivation”
Claim · model-written summary
Tiller number, leaf area and root biomass of rice were higher under plastic film mulching than under conventional cultivation.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae2
- Treatment
- plastic film mulchinge2
- Outcome
- tiller number,leaf area and root biomasse2
- Direction
- highere2
- Comparator
- conventional cultivatione2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“The tiller number,leaf area and root biomass of rice under plastic film mulching were higher than that in conventional cultivation”
Claim · model-written summary
Heading stage of rice was put off by 3 days under plastic film mulching relative to conventional cultivation.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae3
- Treatment
- plastic film mulchinge3
- Outcome
- heading stagee3
- Direction
- put offe3
- Value
- 3 dayse3
- Comparator
- conventional cultivatione3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“rice under plastic film mulching were higher than that in conventional cultivation,while heading stage was put off for 3 days”
Claim · model-written summary
Leaf vitality of rice showed premature aging under traditional treatment in contrast with plastic film mulching.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- plastic film mulchinge4
- Outcome
- leaf vitalitye4
- Direction
- premature aginge4
- Comparator
- traditional treatmente4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“leaf vitality under traditional treatment was premature aging in contrast with plastic film mulching”
t0“rice”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors conclude that rice plastic film mulching cultivation is an efficient technology.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae5
- Outcome
- efficient technologye5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“rice plastic film mulching cultivation was an efficient technology”
The same questions in other papers
mulching · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ
105 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
122 papers more in this group
See all 126 papers →mulching · phenology · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
mulching · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
42 papers more in this group
See all 46 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.