Paper · 2026 · Circular Agricultural Systems

Mitigating methane and enhancing rice productivity: an integrated assessment of biodegradable PLA mulch and microalgal biofertilizers in submerged rice cultivation

Thinley Penjor; Jiraporn Inthasan; Chatprawee Dechjiraratthanasiri; et al.

13
claims
25
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Rice paddies are a significant source of methane (CH4), yet mitigation options that maintain yield under continuous flooding remain limited. This study evaluated the effects of biodegradable polylactic acid (PLA) mulch and biofertilizer on greenhouse gas emissions, plant performance, and greenhouse gas intensity (GHGI) in a factorial field experiment with eight different treatments combined across two rice varieties. Stage-integrated assessment of CH4 and CO2 fluxes was measured at tillering, flowering, and harvest. CH4 emissions were strongly growth-stage dependent, with the highest emissions occurring during the flowering stage, particularly in the high-emitting BF-888 no-mulch treatment. The PLA mulch reduced flowering stage CH4 emissions by 40%–70% relative to no-mulch in several treatment combinations, despite causing a modest increase during tillering. CO2 fluxes exhibited a relatively uniform temporal pattern across growth stages, with limited variation among treatments and no significant effects of mulch or biofertilizer. GHGI varied sharply across treatments, with the highest value (GHGI ≈ 8.1) occurring in Microalgal 888 without mulch due to elevated flowering-stage CH4 emissions. On the contrary, PLA Mulch x biofertilizer (New San Pa Tong) and No Mulch by No Fertilizer (SP) treatments produced GHGI values below 1.0, indicating more efficient emissions per unit yield. Generally, PLA mulch did not uniformly suppress CH4 but redistributed emissions across growth stages, reducing late-season peaks and improving GHGI when paired with suitable fertilizer variety combinations. The outcomes demonstrate that PLA mulch and biofertilizers can contribute to low-emission rice production when applied in conjunction with context-specific management strategies.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CH4 emissions in rice were strongly growth-stage dependent, highest at the flowering stage.

Organ / stage
flowering stagee0
Outcome
CH4 emissionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“submerged rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–163 · show in text ↑
e0

“CH4 emissions were strongly growth-stage dependent, with the highest emissions occurring during the flowering stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–637 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest CH4 emissions occurred particularly in the high-emitting BF-888 no-mulch treatment.

Material
BF-888e0
Organ / stage
flowering stagee0
Treatment
no-mulche0
Outcome
CH4 emissionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“submerged rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–163 · show in text ↑
e0

“CH4 emissions were strongly growth-stage dependent, with the highest emissions occurring during the flowering stage, particularly in the high-emitting BF-888 no-mulch treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–698 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PLA mulch reduced flowering-stage CH4 emissions by 40%-70% relative to no-mulch in several treatment combinations.

Treatment
PLA mulche0
Outcome
flowering stage CH4 emissionse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
40%–70%e0
Comparator
no-mulche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“submerged rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–163 · show in text ↑
e0

“The PLA mulch reduced flowering stage CH4 emissions by 40%–70% relative to no-mulch in several treatment combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–817 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PLA mulch caused a modest increase in CH4 emissions during tillering.

Organ / stage
tilleringe0
Treatment
PLA mulche0
Outcome
CH4 emissionse0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
modeste0
Comparator
no-mulche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“submerged rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–163 · show in text ↑
e0

“The PLA mulch reduced flowering stage CH4 emissions by 40%–70% relative to no-mulch in several treatment combinations, despite causing a modest increase during tillering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–869 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 fluxes showed a relatively uniform temporal pattern across growth stages.

Outcome
CO2 fluxese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“submerged rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–163 · show in text ↑
e0

“CO2 fluxes exhibited a relatively uniform temporal pattern across growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–950 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch and biofertilizer had no significant effects on CO2 fluxes, with limited variation among treatments.

Treatment
mulch or biofertilizere0
Outcome
CO2 fluxese0
Direction
no significant effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“submerged rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–163 · show in text ↑
e0

“CO2 fluxes exhibited a relatively uniform temporal pattern across growth stages, with limited variation among treatments and no significant effects of mulch or biofertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–1044 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GHGI varied sharply across treatments, with the highest value of about 8.1 in Microalgal 888 without mulch due to elevated flowering-stage CH4 emissions.

Material
Microalgal 888e0
Treatment
without mulche0
Outcome
GHGIe0
Value
8.1e0
Qualifier
due to elevated flowering-stage CH4 emissionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“submerged rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–163 · show in text ↑
e0

“GHGI varied sharply across treatments, with the highest value (GHGI ≈ 8.1) occurring in Microalgal 888 without mulch due to elevated flowering-stage CH4 emissions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1208 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The PLA mulch by biofertilizer (New San Pa Tong) treatment produced GHGI values below 1.0.

Material
New San Pa Tonge0
Treatment
PLA Mulch x biofertilizere0
Outcome
GHGI valuese0
Direction
belowe0
Value
1.0e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“submerged rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–163 · show in text ↑
e0

“PLA Mulch x biofertilizer (New San Pa Tong) and No Mulch by No Fertilizer (SP) treatments produced GHGI values below 1.0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1347 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The no mulch by no fertilizer (SP) treatment produced GHGI values below 1.0.

Material
SPe0
Treatment
No Mulch by No Fertilizere0
Outcome
GHGI valuese0
Direction
belowe0
Value
1.0e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“submerged rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–163 · show in text ↑
e0

“PLA Mulch x biofertilizer (New San Pa Tong) and No Mulch by No Fertilizer (SP) treatments produced GHGI values below 1.0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1347 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PLA mulch did not uniformly suppress CH4 but redistributed emissions across growth stages.

Treatment
PLA mulche0
Outcome
CH4e0
Direction
did not uniformly suppresse0
Qualifier
redistributed emissions across growth stagese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“submerged rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–163 · show in text ↑
e0

“PLA mulch did not uniformly suppress CH4 but redistributed emissions across growth stages, reducing late-season peaks and improving GHGI when paired with suitable fertilizer variety combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1412–1606 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PLA mulch reduced late-season CH4 emission peaks.

Treatment
PLA mulche0
Outcome
late-season peakse0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“submerged rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–163 · show in text ↑
e0

“PLA mulch did not uniformly suppress CH4 but redistributed emissions across growth stages, reducing late-season peaks and improving GHGI when paired with suitable fertilizer variety combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1412–1606 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PLA mulch improved GHGI when paired with suitable fertilizer variety combinations.

Treatment
PLA mulche0
Outcome
GHGIe0
Direction
improvinge0
Qualifier
when paired with suitable fertilizer variety combinationse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“submerged rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–163 · show in text ↑
e0

“PLA mulch did not uniformly suppress CH4 but redistributed emissions across growth stages, reducing late-season peaks and improving GHGI when paired with suitable fertilizer variety combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1412–1606 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that PLA mulch and biofertilizers can contribute to low-emission rice production when applied with context-specific management strategies.

Outcome
low-emission rice productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PLA mulch and biofertilizers can contribute to low-emission rice production when applied in conjunction with context-specific management strategies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1638–1785 · show in text ↑

mulching · phenology · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mulching · environment: emissions · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · environment: emissions · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

mulching · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

78 papers: 72 positive, 6 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

74 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

219 papers: 199 positive, 20 negative or no effect

198 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

215 papers more in this group

See all 219 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.