Abstract
An experiment was conducted during rainy season (kharif) 1991 with 9 genotypes ('RCP 5-2', 'Aruna', 'HC 6', 'HC8','VP1','J1 35','48-1', 'Sowbhagya' and 'JM 6') of castor (Ricinus communis L.) along with a control ('GCH4'), dif fering in plant stature and duration under 2 dates of seeding (28 June 1991 and 6 September 1991) each under irrigated and rainfed conditions. Reduction under rainted conditions Was higher for stem height, diameter and internode length than under irrigated conditions in early genotypes. The reduction was much higher for medium and late duration genotypes. Node number remained unchanged under both the situations. Under late-seeded conditions increase in stem height but decrease in diameter was observed. No difference in days to flowering was observed for the genotypes SOWn on 28 June 1991 between irrigated and rainfed conditions, but for the genotypes sown on 6 September 1991 the flowering extended with late duration variety 'JM 6' producing no tertiaries. Though there was significant reduction in both number and green area of the leaves, only few varieties like 'JI 35' and·'Aruna' maintained large leaf area even under rainfed conditions under both normal and delayed seedings. The stem and leaf weight in varieties like 'JI 35', 'Aruna' and '48-1' was high under irrigated conditions and these varieties maintained their superiority even under rainfed conditions. The study indicated that different varieties gave high yield through different yield components; though capsule number, capsule weight and seed number were the major components under both irrigated and rainted situations. A total yield reduction of 49% was observed while oil content was least influenced by the stress conditions.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 17
Claim · model-written summary
Rainfed conditions reduced stem height, diameter and internode length more than irrigation in early genotypes.
- Taxon
- castor
Ricinus communise1 - Material
- early genotypese0
- Treatment
- rainted conditionse0
- Outcome
- stem height, diameter and internode lengthe0
- Direction
- Reductione0
- Comparator
- irrigated conditionse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Reduction under rainted conditions Was higher for stem height, diameter and internode length than under irrigated conditions in early genotypes”
e1“castor (Ricinus communis L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Rainfed reductions were greater in medium and late duration genotypes.
- Taxon
- castorRicinus communise3
- Material
- medium and late duration genotypese0
- Treatment
- rainted conditionse1
- Outcome
- reductione0
- Direction
- much highere0
- Comparator
- irrigated conditionse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The reduction was much higher for medium and late duration genotypes”
e1“under rainted conditions”
e2“than under irrigated conditions in early genotypes”
e3“castor (Ricinus communis L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Node number was unchanged between water conditions.
- Taxon
- castorRicinus communise2
- Treatment
- rainfed conditionse1
- Outcome
- Node numbere0
- Direction
- unchangede0
- Comparator
- irrigatede1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Node number remained unchanged under both the situations”
e1“each under irrigated and rainfed conditions”
e2“castor (Ricinus communis L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Late seeding increased stem height.
- Taxon
- castorRicinus communise1
- Treatment
- late-seeded conditionse0
- Outcome
- stem heighte0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Under late-seeded conditions increase in stem height but decrease in diameter was observed”
e1“castor (Ricinus communis L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Late seeding decreased stem diameter.
- Taxon
- castorRicinus communise1
- Treatment
- late-seeded conditionse0
- Outcome
- diametere0
- Direction
- decreasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Under late-seeded conditions increase in stem height but decrease in diameter was observed”
e1“castor (Ricinus communis L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Flowering time did not differ under irrigation and rainfed conditions for June sowing.
- Taxon
- castorRicinus communise1
- Treatment
- rainfed conditionse0
- Outcome
- days to floweringe0
- Direction
- No differencee0
- Qualifier
- 28 June 1991e0
- Comparator
- irrigatede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“No difference in days to flowering was observed for the genotypes SOWn on 28 June 1991 between irrigated and rainfed conditions”
e1“castor (Ricinus communis L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
September sowing extended flowering.
- Taxon
- castorRicinus communise1
- Treatment
- sown on 6 September 1991e0
- Outcome
- floweringe0
- Direction
- extendede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“for the genotypes sown on 6 September 1991 the flowering extended”
e1“castor (Ricinus communis L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
JM 6 produced no tertiaries under September sowing.
- Taxon
- castorRicinus communise1
- Material
- 'JM 6'e0
- Outcome
- no tertiariese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“late duration variety 'JM 6' producing no tertiaries”
e1“castor (Ricinus communis L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Rainfed conditions significantly reduced leaf number and green area.
- Taxon
- castorRicinus communise2
- Treatment
- rainfed conditionse1
- Outcome
- number and green area of the leavese0
- Direction
- reductione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“there was significant reduction in both number and green area of the leaves”
e1“even under rainfed conditions under both normal and delayed seedings”
e2“castor (Ricinus communis L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
JI 35 and Aruna maintained large leaf area under rainfed conditions and both seeding dates.
- Taxon
- castorRicinus communise1
- Material
- 'JI 35'e0
- Outcome
- maintained large leaf areae0
- Qualifier
- under rainfed conditions under both normal and delayed seedingse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“'JI 35' and·'Aruna' maintained large leaf area even under rainfed conditions under both normal and delayed seedings”
e1“castor (Ricinus communis L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Aruna maintained large leaf area under rainfed conditions and both seeding dates.
- Taxon
- castorRicinus communise1
- Material
- 'Aruna'e0
- Outcome
- maintained large leaf areae0
- Qualifier
- under rainfed conditions under both normal and delayed seedingse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“'JI 35' and·'Aruna' maintained large leaf area even under rainfed conditions under both normal and delayed seedings”
e1“castor (Ricinus communis L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
JI 35 had high stem and leaf weight under irrigation and maintained superiority under rainfed conditions.
- Taxon
- castorRicinus communise1
- Material
- 'JI 35'e0
- Outcome
- stem and leaf weighte0
- Direction
- highe0
- Qualifier
- even under rainfed conditionse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The stem and leaf weight in varieties like 'JI 35', 'Aruna' and '48-1' was high under irrigated conditions and these varieties maintained their superiority even under rainfed conditions”
e1“castor (Ricinus communis L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Aruna had high stem and leaf weight under irrigation and maintained superiority under rainfed conditions.
- Taxon
- castorRicinus communise1
- Material
- 'Aruna'e0
- Outcome
- stem and leaf weighte0
- Direction
- highe0
- Qualifier
- even under rainfed conditionse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The stem and leaf weight in varieties like 'JI 35', 'Aruna' and '48-1' was high under irrigated conditions and these varieties maintained their superiority even under rainfed conditions”
e1“castor (Ricinus communis L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
48-1 had high stem and leaf weight under irrigation and maintained superiority under rainfed conditions.
- Taxon
- castorRicinus communise1
- Material
- '48-1'e0
- Outcome
- stem and leaf weighte0
- Direction
- highe0
- Qualifier
- even under rainfed conditionse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The stem and leaf weight in varieties like 'JI 35', 'Aruna' and '48-1' was high under irrigated conditions and these varieties maintained their superiority even under rainfed conditions”
e1“castor (Ricinus communis L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Capsule number, capsule weight and seed number were major yield components under both water regimes.
- Taxon
- castorRicinus communise1
- Organ / stage
- capsulee0
- Outcome
- yielde2
- Qualifier
- under both irrigated and rainted situationse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“capsule number, capsule weight and seed number were the major components under both irrigated and rainted situations”
e1“castor (Ricinus communis L.)”
e2“high yield through different yield components”
Claim · model-written summary
Stress conditions reduced total yield by 49%.
- Taxon
- castorRicinus communise2
- Treatment
- stress conditionse1
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 49%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A total yield reduction of 49% was observed”
e1“stress conditions”
e2“castor (Ricinus communis L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Oil content was least influenced by stress conditions.
- Taxon
- castorRicinus communise1
- Treatment
- stress conditionse0
- Outcome
- oil contente0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“oil content was least influenced by the stress conditions”
e1“castor (Ricinus communis L.)”
The same questions in other papers
rainfall · growth · Ricinus communis (castor bean)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
sowing time · growth · Ricinus communis (castor bean)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- no effect
- no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.