Paper · 2009 · Ganhan diqu nongye yanjiu

Effects of irrigation and sulphur and their interactions on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of winter wheat

Wenzhong Tian; Yunji Zhu; Guo Tian-cai; et al.

5
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Effects of different sulphur rate and irrigation time on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of two high-yield winter wheat cultivars with different spike types(LKAZ8 with a big spike and YM49-198 with a multiple spike) were studied under field experiment conditions.The results showed that the yield of the S60 with 60 kg/hm2 was higher than that of S30(30 kg/hm2) and S0(0 kg/hm2),and the differences reached a significant level between them. Compared to control(S0),the yield of LKAZ8 and YM49-198 with S60 increased by 19.32% and 9.24%,respectively.Photosynthetic rate and SPAD value of two cultivars with S60 were higher than that with S30(30 kg/hm2) and S0(0 kg/hm2) at the final.Among irrigation treatments,difference existed between the yield of two cultivars.The highest yield treatment of LKAZ8 was W0(non-irrigation),and YM49-198 was W1(jointing stage irrigation) treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

S60 significantly increased LKAZ8 yield by 19.32% over S0.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
LKAZ8e0
Treatment
S60e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
19.32%e0
Comparator
S0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–116 · show in text ↑
e0

“Compared to control(S0),the yield of LKAZ8 and YM49-198 with S60 increased by 19.32% and 9.24%,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–557 · show in text ↑
e1

“the differences reached a significant level between them”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–448 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

S60 increased YM49-198 yield by 9.24% over S0.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
YM49-198e0
Treatment
S60e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9.24%e0
Comparator
S0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–116 · show in text ↑
e0

“Compared to control(S0),the yield of LKAZ8 and YM49-198 with S60 increased by 19.32% and 9.24%,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–557 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S60 raised photosynthetic rate and SPAD value in both cultivars relative to S30 and S0.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
S60e0
Outcome
Photosynthetic rate and SPAD valuee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
S30(30 kg/hm2) and S0(0 kg/hm2)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–116 · show in text ↑
e0

“Photosynthetic rate and SPAD value of two cultivars with S60 were higher than that with S30(30 kg/hm2) and S0(0 kg/hm2) at the final”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–690 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LKAZ8 had its highest yield without irrigation.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
LKAZ8e0
Treatment
W0(non-irrigation)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–116 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest yield treatment of LKAZ8 was W0(non-irrigation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–832 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

YM49-198 had its highest yield with jointing stage irrigation.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
YM49-198e0
Treatment
W1(jointing stage irrigation)e0
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–116 · show in text ↑
e0

“YM49-198 was W1(jointing stage irrigation) treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–889 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest yield treatment of LKAZ8 was W0(non-irrigation),and YM49-198 was W1(jointing stage irrigation) treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–889 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.