Intervention effectmodel-written summary

YM49-198 had its highest yield with jointing stage irrigation.

A claim from Effects of irrigation and sulphur and their interactions on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of winter wheat · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

YM49-198 had its highest yield with jointing stage irrigation.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
YM49-198e0
Treatment
W1(jointing stage irrigation)e0
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–116
e0

“YM49-198 was W1(jointing stage irrigation) treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–889
e1

“The highest yield treatment of LKAZ8 was W0(non-irrigation),and YM49-198 was W1(jointing stage irrigation) treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–889

Title

Effects of irrigation and sulphur and their interactions on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of winter wheat

Wenzhong Tian; Yunji Zhu; Guo Tian-cai; et al. Ganhan diqu nongye yanjiu 2009

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-7af79ad49c6eca7a438869204577f524d95effdec9ce0e44f62275f9d4b1530c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Minimum irrigation lowered average winter wheat yield by 14% versus full irrigation.

    Performance of Double‐Cropped Winter Wheat–Summer Maize under Minimum Irrigation in the North China Plain · 2006 · compared with fully irrigated treatment (FI)

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Moderately saline water substituted for good quality water during part of the season maintained total wheat grain yield.

    Time of Salt Stress Affects Growth and Yield Components of Irrigated Wheat · 1994 · compared with good quality water

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Saline irrigation caused soil salinization and reduced wheat growth and yield.

    Effect of Straw Biochar on Soil Properties and Wheat Production under Saline Water Irrigation · 2019

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Deficit irrigation in salt-affected soil reduced wheat productivity.

    Collaborative Impact of Compost and Beneficial Rhizobacteria on Soil Properties, Physiological Attributes, and Productivity of Wheat Subjected to Deficit Irrigation in Salt Affected Soil · 2022

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Wastewater irrigation decreased plant height, leaf area and grain yield in wheat.

    Effect of Wastewater Irrigation on Photosynthesis, Growth, and Anatomical Features of Two Wheat Cultivars (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2020

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    An additional 33 mm of irrigation did not increase grain yield.

    Source–sink balance and manipulating sink–source relations of wheat indicate that the yield potential of wheat is sink-limited in high-rainfall zones · 2010

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    DI water saving had no effect on wheat yield.

    Yield and water productivity of maize and wheat under deficit and raised bed irrigation practices in Egypt · 2012

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Limited irrigation yielded 99% of full irrigation for winter wheat.

    Cropping Systems for Stretching Limited Irrigation Supplies · 1993 · compared with fully irrigated

    Opposite direction

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.