Paper · 2009

The Effects of Different Levels of Osmotic Stresson Germination and Seedling Growth in PromisingDurum Wheat Genotypes

Ali Akbar Moayedi Ghodsi

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A study was carried out to compare the appreciable differences between various durum wheat genotypes during the germination and seedling stages. Twenty promising spring durum wheat genotypes were tested under four (0.0, -0.3, -0.6 3 and -0.9 MPa) osmotic stresses conditions laid out in factorial experiments based on a completely randomized design (CRD) with three replications. Osmotic potentials were produced using different concentrations of polyethylene glycol (PEG 6000) at 20°C. Results revealed that all the recorded traits were significantly (P<0.01) affected by osmotic stress treatments. There were remarkable decreases in germination percentage, coleoptile, root and shoot length, shoot dry weight, seedling dry weight with increasing osmotic stress. However the germination rate showed a slight increase under low osmotic stress condition. The highest germination percentage was 93.5%, observed in D1 (control) treatment whilst the lowest (42%) was seen in the D4 (-0.9 MPa) treatment. Furthermore, root dry weight, root to shoot length ratio and root to shoot dry weight ratio also increased under low osmotic stress, although severe osmotic stress caused a sizeable decrease in their values. The genotypic effects on germination percentage and rate were highly significant (P<0.01), whilst its effects on coleoptile, root length and root dry weight were significant (P<0.05). Genotype four (G4) exhibited the highest germination percentage (84.17%) whilst G17 showed the lowest value (62.92%). Correlation studies amongst the different traits showed that the highest correlation coefficient was between seedling dry weight and shoot dry weight (r = 0.96), whilst the lowest value was between germination rate and root to shoot dry weight (r = 0.13). _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Osmotic stress significantly affected all recorded seedling traits.

Treatment
osmotic stress treatmentse0
Outcome
all the recorded traitse0
Value
P<0.01e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all the recorded traits were significantly (P<0.01) affected by osmotic stress treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–598 · show in text ↑
e1

“Twenty promising spring durum wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–190 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing osmotic stress decreased germination percentage, coleoptile, root and shoot length, and shoot and seedling dry weight.

Treatment
increasing osmotic stresse0
Outcome
germination percentage, coleoptile, root and shoot length, shoot dry weight, seedling dry weighte0
Direction
decreasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“remarkable decreases in germination percentage, coleoptile, root and shoot length, shoot dry weight, seedling dry weight with increasing osmotic stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–762 · show in text ↑
e1

“Twenty promising spring durum wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–190 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination rate increased slightly under low osmotic stress.

Treatment
low osmotic stress conditione0
Outcome
germination ratee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“germination rate showed a slight increase under low osmotic stress condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–852 · show in text ↑
e1

“Twenty promising spring durum wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–190 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control treatment D1 had the highest germination percentage, 93.5%.

Treatment
D1 (control) treatmente0
Outcome
germination percentagee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
93.5%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest germination percentage was 93.5%, observed in D1 (control) treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–934 · show in text ↑
e1

“Twenty promising spring durum wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–190 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root dry weight and root-to-shoot length and dry-weight ratios increased under low osmotic stress.

Treatment
low osmotic stresse0
Outcome
root dry weight, root to shoot length ratio and root to shoot dry weight ratioe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root dry weight, root to shoot length ratio and root to shoot dry weight ratio also increased under low osmotic stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1131 · show in text ↑
e1

“Twenty promising spring durum wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–190 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe osmotic stress substantially decreased root dry weight and root-to-shoot ratios.

Treatment
severe osmotic stresse0
Outcome
root dry weight, root to shoot length ratio and root to shoot dry weight ratioe0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root dry weight, root to shoot length ratio and root to shoot dry weight ratio also increased under low osmotic stress, although severe osmotic stress caused a sizeable decrease in their values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1206 · show in text ↑
e1

“Twenty promising spring durum wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–190 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype significantly affected germination percentage and rate at P<0.01.

Material
durum wheat genotypese1
Outcome
germination percentage and ratee0
Value
P<0.01e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“genotypic effects on germination percentage and rate were highly significant (P<0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1297 · show in text ↑
e1

“Twenty promising spring durum wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–190 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype significantly affected coleoptile and root length and root dry weight at P<0.05.

Material
durum wheat genotypese1
Outcome
coleoptile, root length and root dry weighte0
Value
P<0.05e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“its effects on coleoptile, root length and root dry weight were significant (P<0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1390 · show in text ↑
e1

“Twenty promising spring durum wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–190 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G4 had the highest genotype germination percentage, 84.17%.

Material
Genotype four (G4)e0
Outcome
germination percentagee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
84.17%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genotype four (G4) exhibited the highest germination percentage (84.17%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1464 · show in text ↑
e1

“Twenty promising spring durum wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–190 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedling and shoot dry weights had the highest reported trait correlation, r = 0.96.

Organ / stage
seedlinge0
Outcome
correlation coefficiente0
Value
r = 0.96e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest correlation coefficient was between seedling dry weight and shoot dry weight (r = 0.96)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1575–1670 · show in text ↑
e1

“Twenty promising spring durum wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–190 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination rate and root-to-shoot dry weight had the lowest reported trait correlation, r = 0.13.

Organ / stage
root to shoote0
Outcome
germination rate and root to shoot dry weighte0
Value
r = 0.13e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lowest value was between germination rate and root to shoot dry weight (r = 0.13)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1683–1764 · show in text ↑
e1

“Twenty promising spring durum wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–190 · show in text ↑

drought · growth · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Results differ

30 papers: 7 positive, 23 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.