Paper · 2011 · International Journal of Food Science & Technology

Delayed harvest and cold storage period influence ethylene production, fruit firmness and quality of ‘Cripps Pink’ apple

Muhammad Shafiq; Zora Singh; Ahmad S Khan

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
15
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of harvest date and cold storage period on ethylene production, fruit firmness and quality of ‘Cripps Pink’ apple were investigated. Fruit were harvested from Perth Hills and Donnybrook (Western Australia) at commercial maturity (CM), 2, 4 and 6 weeks after CM prior to 0, 45, 90 and 135 days cold storage in 2003 and 2004. Delayed harvest significantly increased ethylene production, CIE values a* and C* at both locations in 2 years. Delayed harvest and extended cold storage period increased the internal ethylene production and reduced fruit firmness, soluble solids concentration: titratable acidity (SSC:TA) ratio and reduced CIE values L*, b*, h° during both years and locations. Fruit harvested 2 weeks after CM can be cold-stored for 90 days with acceptable fruit quality. If the fruit is intended to be sold fresh immediately in local markets, the harvest can be delayed up to 6 weeks after CM to harness substantially improved fruit colour with acceptable fruit quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed harvest significantly increased ethylene production and fruit color a* and C* in both locations and years.

Treatment
Delayed harveste0
Outcome
ethylene production, CIE values a* and C*e0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
at both locations in 2 yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Delayed harvest significantly increased ethylene production, CIE values a* and C* at both locations in 2 years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–446 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Cripps Pink’ apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed harvest and longer cold storage increased internal ethylene production.

Treatment
Delayed harvest and extended cold storage periode0
Outcome
internal ethylene productione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Delayed harvest and extended cold storage period increased the internal ethylene production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–539 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Cripps Pink’ apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed harvest and longer cold storage reduced firmness, SSC:TA ratio, and L*, b*, and h° color values.

Treatment
Delayed harvest and extended cold storage periode0
Outcome
fruit firmness, soluble solids concentration: titratable acidity (SSC:TA) ratioe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Delayed harvest and extended cold storage period increased the internal ethylene production and reduced fruit firmness, soluble solids concentration: titratable acidity (SSC:TA) ratio and reduced CIE values L*, b*, h° during both years and locations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–697 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Cripps Pink’ apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–120 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded fruit harvested two weeks after commercial maturity can be stored 90 days with acceptable quality.

Outcome
cold-stored for 90 days with acceptable fruit qualitye0
Value
90 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit harvested 2 weeks after CM can be cold-stored for 90 days with acceptable fruit quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–792 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Cripps Pink’ apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–120 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

For immediate fresh sale, the authors recommended delaying harvest up to six weeks after commercial maturity to improve color while retaining acceptable quality.

Outcome
harvest can be delayed up to 6 weeks after CMe0
Value
6 weekse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the harvest can be delayed up to 6 weeks after CM to harness substantially improved fruit colour with acceptable fruit quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–992 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Cripps Pink’ apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–120 · show in text ↑

stage · quality: sugar starch · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

cold · quality: sugar starch · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

cold · physiology: hormones · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.