Paper · 2007 · Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

EFFECT OF FERTILITY LEVELS ON NEWLY DEVELOPED SUGARCANE VARIETIES OF NORTH-WEST ZONE OF INDIA

S. N. L. Srivastava; Roshan Lal; Mehar Chand; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted for three crop seasons of 2001-02, 2002-03 and 2003-04 (planted in spring season), in order to find out the effect of fertility levels (nitrogen and phosphorus) on yield and quality of newly developed early and mid –late maturing sugarcane varieties of North-West Zone of the country under All India Coordinated Research Project on sugarcane. Early maturing variety CoS 96258 proved significantly superior to other two early maturing varieties namely CoLk 9414 and CoJ 96191, the later two being statistically at par in respect of cane yield. Amongst the mid-late maturing varieties, CoS 93278 proved significantly superior over variety CoH 119, which in turn proved significantly superior to variety CoH 110 in respect of cane yield. There was significant increase in cane yield of early maturing varieties due to increasing doses of nitrogen and phosphorus from 75% to 125% of recommendation, but this increase was significant only upto 100% of recommended doses of nitrogen and phosphorus in case of mid –late maturing varieties. Though, there was non- significant effect of varieties and fertility levels on CCS percentage, but the production of commercial cane sugar (t/ha) varied considerably according to cane yield of varieties and influence of fertility levels.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early variety CoS 96258 had significantly higher cane yield than CoLk 9414 and CoJ 96191.

Taxon
SUGARCANEt0
Material
CoS 96258e0
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
CoLk 9414 and CoJ 96191e0

Verbatim

t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“Early maturing variety CoS 96258 proved significantly superior to other two early maturing varieties namely CoLk 9414 and CoJ 96191, the later two being statistically at par in respect of cane yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–574 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CoLk 9414 and CoJ 96191 had statistically comparable cane yield.

Taxon
SUGARCANEt0
Material
CoLk 9414e0
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
statistically at pare0
Comparator
CoJ 96191e0

Verbatim

t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“CoLk 9414 and CoJ 96191, the later two being statistically at par in respect of cane yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–574 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mid-late CoS 93278 had significantly higher cane yield than CoH 119.

Taxon
SUGARCANEt0
Material
CoS 93278e0
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
CoH 119e0

Verbatim

t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“CoS 93278 proved significantly superior over variety CoH 119, which in turn proved significantly superior to variety CoH 110 in respect of cane yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–766 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mid-late CoH 119 had significantly higher cane yield than CoH 110.

Taxon
SUGARCANEt0
Material
CoH 119e0
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
CoH 110e0

Verbatim

t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“CoH 119, which in turn proved significantly superior to variety CoH 110 in respect of cane yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–766 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen and phosphorus from 75% to 125% of recommendation significantly increased early sugarcane yield.

Taxon
SUGARCANEt0
Treatment
increasing doses of nitrogen and phosphorus from 75% to 125% of recommendatione0
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
75%e0

Verbatim

e0

“significant increase in cane yield of early maturing varieties due to increasing doses of nitrogen and phosphorus from 75% to 125% of recommendation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–926 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

For mid-late varieties, fertilizer increases improved cane yield significantly only up to 100% of recommended nitrogen and phosphorus.

Taxon
SUGARCANEt0
Treatment
100% of recommended doses of nitrogen and phosphoruse0
Outcome
increasee0
Direction
increasee0

Verbatim

e0

“this increase was significant only upto 100% of recommended doses of nitrogen and phosphorus in case of mid –late maturing varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1064 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety and fertility level did not significantly change CCS percentage.

Taxon
SUGARCANEt0
Treatment
fertility levelse0
Outcome
CCS percentagee0
Direction
non- significante0

Verbatim

e0

“non- significant effect of varieties and fertility levels on CCS percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1159 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–55 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Commercial cane sugar production varied with variety yield and fertility levels.

Taxon
SUGARCANEt0
Material
varietiese0
Treatment
fertility levelse0
Outcome
production of commercial cane sugar (t/ha)e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“production of commercial cane sugar (t/ha) varied considerably according to cane yield of varieties and influence of fertility levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1302 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–55 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

137 papers: 118 positive, 19 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

133 papers more in this group

See all 137 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 55 positive, 2 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.