Paper · 2005 · Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling

Water retention capacity of tissue cultured plants

G.J.M. de Klerk; F. Wijnhoven

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
9
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Leaves rapidly close their stomata after detachment resulting in a strong reduction of water loss. It has been reported that detached leaves of in vitro produced plants show continuous water loss indicating that they are unable to close the stomata properly and/or that their cuticle is malfunctioning. We examined the water retention capacity (WRC) of detached primary leaves of in vitro germinating seedlings of Vigna radiata (mungbean). It was shown that the poor WRC was most likely due to deterioration of the stomata by the high relative humidity in the headspace. Other features of the headspace, viz., O2, CO2 and ethylene levels, did not play a significant role. Some medium additions improved the WRC somewhat, viz., paclobutrazol and abscisic acid. Other additions such as the ethylene precursor 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid, the ethylene blocker silverthiosulphate and cytokinin had no or a slight negative effect.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The poor water retention capacity of detached Vigna radiata leaves was most likely due to deterioration of the stomata by high relative humidity in the headspace.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatae0
Treatment
high relative humidity in the headspacee1
Outcome
water retention capacitye0
Qualifier
deterioration of the stomatae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water retention capacity (WRC) of detached primary leaves of in vitro germinating seedlings of Vigna radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–427 · show in text ↑
e1

“the poor WRC was most likely due to deterioration of the stomata by the high relative humidity in the headspace”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–569 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

O2, CO2 and ethylene levels in the headspace did not play a significant role in water retention capacity.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatae0
Treatment
O2, CO2 and ethylene levelse1
Outcome
water retention capacitye0
Direction
did not play a significant rolee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water retention capacity (WRC) of detached primary leaves of in vitro germinating seedlings of Vigna radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–427 · show in text ↑
e1

“Other features of the headspace, viz., O2, CO2 and ethylene levels, did not play a significant role”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–670 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium additions of paclobutrazol and abscisic acid improved water retention capacity somewhat.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatae0
Treatment
paclobutrazol and abscisic acide1
Outcome
water retention capacitye0
Direction
improvede1
Qualifier
somewhate1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water retention capacity (WRC) of detached primary leaves of in vitro germinating seedlings of Vigna radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–427 · show in text ↑
e1

“Some medium additions improved the WRC somewhat, viz., paclobutrazol and abscisic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–758 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ACC, silverthiosulphate and cytokinin had no or a slight negative effect on water retention capacity.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatae0
Treatment
1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid, the ethylene blocker silverthiosulphate and cytokinine1
Outcome
water retention capacitye0
Direction
no or a slight negative effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water retention capacity (WRC) of detached primary leaves of in vitro germinating seedlings of Vigna radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–427 · show in text ↑
e1

“Other additions such as the ethylene precursor 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid, the ethylene blocker silverthiosulphate and cytokinin had no or a slight negative effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–934 · show in text ↑

co2 · physiology: water · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.