Paper · 2015 · Journal of Integrative Agriculture

Leaf photosynthesis and yield components of mung bean under fully open-air elevated [CO2]

Ji GAO; Xue HAN; Saman Seneweera; et al.

16
claims
36
verbatim quotes
53
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) has the potential to establish symbiosis with rhizobia, and symbiotic association of soil micro flora may facilitate the photosynthesis and plant growth response to elevated [CO2]. Mung bean was grown at either ambient CO2 400 µmol mol−1 or [CO2] ((550±17) µmol mol−1) under free air carbon dioxide enrichment (FACE) experimental facility in North China. Elevated [CO2] increased net photosynthetic rate (Pn), water use efficiency (WUE) and the non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) of upper most fully-expanded leaves, but decreased stomatal conductance (Gs), intrinsic efficiency of PSII (Fv′/Fm′), quantum yield of PSII (ϕPSII) and proportion of open PSII reaction centers (qP). At elevated [CO2], the decrease of Fv′/Fm′, ϕPSII, qp at the bloom stage were smaller than that at the pod stage. On the other hand, Pn was increased at elevated [CO2] by 18.7 and 7.4% at full bloom (R2) and pod maturity stages (R4), respectively. From these findings, we concluded that as a legume despite greater nutrient supply to the carbon assimilation at elevated [CO2], photosynthetic capacity of mung bean was still suppressed under elevated [CO2] particularly at pod maturity stage but plant biomass and yield was increased by 11.6 and 14.2%, respectively. Further, these findings suggest that even under higher nutrient acquisition systems such as legumes, nutrient assimilation does not match carbon assimilation under elevated [CO2] and leads photosynthesis down-regulation to elevated [CO2].

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased mung bean leaf net photosynthetic rate.

Taxon
Mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Elevated [CO2]e0
Outcome
net photosynthetic rate (Pn)e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
ambient CO2 400 µmol mol−1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Elevated [CO2] increased net photosynthetic rate (Pn), water use efficiency (WUE) and the non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) of upper most fully-expanded leaves, but decreased stomatal conductance (Gs), intrinsic efficiency of PSII (Fv′/Fm′), quantum yield of PSII (ϕPSII) and proportion of open PSII reaction centers (qP).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–706 · show in text ↑
e1

“ambient CO2 400 µmol mol−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–266 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mung bean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 44–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased water use efficiency.

Taxon
Mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Elevated [CO2]e0
Outcome
water use efficiency (WUE)e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
ambient CO2 400 µmol mol−1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Elevated [CO2] increased net photosynthetic rate (Pn), water use efficiency (WUE) and the non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) of upper most fully-expanded leaves, but decreased stomatal conductance (Gs), intrinsic efficiency of PSII (Fv′/Fm′), quantum yield of PSII (ϕPSII) and proportion of open PSII reaction centers (qP).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–706 · show in text ↑
e1

“ambient CO2 400 µmol mol−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–266 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mung bean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 44–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased non-photochemical quenching.

Taxon
Mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Elevated [CO2]e0
Outcome
non-photochemical quenching (NPQ)e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
ambient CO2 400 µmol mol−1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Elevated [CO2] increased net photosynthetic rate (Pn), water use efficiency (WUE) and the non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) of upper most fully-expanded leaves, but decreased stomatal conductance (Gs), intrinsic efficiency of PSII (Fv′/Fm′), quantum yield of PSII (ϕPSII) and proportion of open PSII reaction centers (qP).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–706 · show in text ↑
e1

“ambient CO2 400 µmol mol−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–266 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mung bean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 44–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 decreased stomatal conductance.

Taxon
Mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Elevated [CO2]e0
Outcome
stomatal conductance (Gs)e0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
ambient CO2 400 µmol mol−1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Elevated [CO2] increased net photosynthetic rate (Pn), water use efficiency (WUE) and the non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) of upper most fully-expanded leaves, but decreased stomatal conductance (Gs), intrinsic efficiency of PSII (Fv′/Fm′), quantum yield of PSII (ϕPSII) and proportion of open PSII reaction centers (qP).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–706 · show in text ↑
e1

“ambient CO2 400 µmol mol−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–266 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mung bean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 44–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 decreased intrinsic PSII efficiency.

Taxon
Mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Elevated [CO2]e0
Outcome
intrinsic efficiency of PSII (Fv′/Fm′)e0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
ambient CO2 400 µmol mol−1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Elevated [CO2] increased net photosynthetic rate (Pn), water use efficiency (WUE) and the non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) of upper most fully-expanded leaves, but decreased stomatal conductance (Gs), intrinsic efficiency of PSII (Fv′/Fm′), quantum yield of PSII (ϕPSII) and proportion of open PSII reaction centers (qP).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–706 · show in text ↑
e1

“ambient CO2 400 µmol mol−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–266 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mung bean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 44–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 decreased PSII quantum yield.

Taxon
Mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Elevated [CO2]e0
Outcome
quantum yield of PSII (ϕPSII)e0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
ambient CO2 400 µmol mol−1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Elevated [CO2] increased net photosynthetic rate (Pn), water use efficiency (WUE) and the non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) of upper most fully-expanded leaves, but decreased stomatal conductance (Gs), intrinsic efficiency of PSII (Fv′/Fm′), quantum yield of PSII (ϕPSII) and proportion of open PSII reaction centers (qP).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–706 · show in text ↑
e1

“ambient CO2 400 µmol mol−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–266 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mung bean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 44–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 decreased the share of open PSII reaction centers.

Taxon
Mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Elevated [CO2]e0
Outcome
proportion of open PSII reaction centers (qP)e0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
ambient CO2 400 µmol mol−1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Elevated [CO2] increased net photosynthetic rate (Pn), water use efficiency (WUE) and the non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) of upper most fully-expanded leaves, but decreased stomatal conductance (Gs), intrinsic efficiency of PSII (Fv′/Fm′), quantum yield of PSII (ϕPSII) and proportion of open PSII reaction centers (qP).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–706 · show in text ↑
e1

“ambient CO2 400 µmol mol−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–266 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mung bean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 44–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The decline in Fv′/Fm′ under elevated CO2 was smaller at bloom than at pod stage.

Taxon
Mung beanVigna radiatat0
Organ / stage
bloom stagee0
Treatment
elevated [CO2]e0
Outcome
Fv′/Fm′e0
Direction
smallere0
Comparator
pod stagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At elevated [CO2], the decrease of Fv′/Fm′, ϕPSII, qp at the bloom stage were smaller than that at the pod stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–820 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mung bean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 44–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The decline in ϕPSII under elevated CO2 was smaller at bloom than at pod stage.

Taxon
Mung beanVigna radiatat0
Organ / stage
bloom stagee0
Treatment
elevated [CO2]e0
Outcome
ϕPSIIe0
Direction
smallere0
Comparator
pod stagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At elevated [CO2], the decrease of Fv′/Fm′, ϕPSII, qp at the bloom stage were smaller than that at the pod stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–820 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mung bean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 44–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The decline in qp under elevated CO2 was smaller at bloom than at pod stage.

Taxon
Mung beanVigna radiatat0
Organ / stage
bloom stagee0
Treatment
elevated [CO2]e0
Outcome
qpe0
Direction
smallere0
Comparator
pod stagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At elevated [CO2], the decrease of Fv′/Fm′, ϕPSII, qp at the bloom stage were smaller than that at the pod stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–820 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mung bean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 44–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased net photosynthesis by 18.7% at full bloom.

Taxon
Mung beanVigna radiatat0
Organ / stage
full bloom (R2)e0
Treatment
elevated [CO2]e0
Outcome
Pne0
Direction
increasede0
Value
18.7e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pn was increased at elevated [CO2] by 18.7 and 7.4% at full bloom (R2) and pod maturity stages (R4), respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–954 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mung bean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 44–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased net photosynthesis by 7.4% at pod maturity.

Taxon
Mung beanVigna radiatat0
Organ / stage
pod maturity stages (R4)e0
Treatment
elevated [CO2]e0
Outcome
Pne0
Direction
increasede0
Value
7.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pn was increased at elevated [CO2] by 18.7 and 7.4% at full bloom (R2) and pod maturity stages (R4), respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–954 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mung bean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 44–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mung bean photosynthetic capacity was suppressed under elevated CO2, especially at pod maturity.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatae0
Organ / stage
pod maturity stagee0
Treatment
elevated [CO2]e0
Outcome
photosynthetic capacitye0
Direction
suppressede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“photosynthetic capacity of mung bean was still suppressed under elevated [CO2] particularly at pod maturity stage but plant biomass and yield was increased by 11.6 and 14.2%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased mung bean biomass by 11.6%.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
elevated [CO2]e0
Outcome
plant biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
11.6e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“photosynthetic capacity of mung bean was still suppressed under elevated [CO2] particularly at pod maturity stage but plant biomass and yield was increased by 11.6 and 14.2%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased mung bean yield by 14.2%.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
elevated [CO2]e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
14.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“photosynthetic capacity of mung bean was still suppressed under elevated [CO2] particularly at pod maturity stage but plant biomass and yield was increased by 11.6 and 14.2%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1272 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer that nutrient assimilation lagged carbon assimilation under elevated CO2 and caused photosynthetic down-regulation.

Taxon
Mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
elevated [CO2]e0
Outcome
photosynthesis down-regulatione0
Qualifier
nutrient assimilation does not match carbon assimilatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutrient assimilation does not match carbon assimilation under elevated [CO2] and leads photosynthesis down-regulation to elevated [CO2].”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1374–1511 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mung bean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 44–53 · show in text ↑

co2 · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

co2 · physiology: water · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

co2 · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 11 positive, 4 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

co2 · physiology: photosynthesis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.