Paper · 2014 · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Cultivar Specific Response of CO2 Fertilization on Two Tropical Mung Bean (Vigna radiata L.) Cultivars: ROS Generation, Antioxidant Status, Physiology, Growth, Yield and Seed Quality

A. K. Mishra; S. B. Agrawal

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
32
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration ( CO 2 ) is an important component of global climate change that will have a significant impact on the productivity of crop plants. In recent years, growth and yield of agricultural crop plants have been shown to increase with elevated CO 2 ( EC ) and have enticed considerable interest due to variation in the response of crop plants. In this study, comparative response of two mung bean cultivars ( HUM ‐2 and HUM ‐6) was evaluated against EC at different growth stages under near‐natural conditions for two consecutive years. The plants were grown in ambient as well as EC (700 ppm) in specially designed open‐top chambers. Under elevated CO 2 , marked down‐regulation of reactive oxygen species ( ROS ) levels, membrane disruption and activities of superoxide dismutase and catalase were noticed in both the cultivars, but the extent of reduction was more in HUM ‐6. As compared to ambient CO 2 , EC increased total chlorophyll, photosynthetic rate, growth and yield parameters. Cultivar‐specific response was noticed as HUM ‐6 showed higher increase in yield attributes than HUM ‐2. Under CO 2 treatment, soluble protein and reducing sugars decreased while total soluble sugars and starch showed an opposite trend. Principal component analysis showed that both the cultivars responded more or less similarly to EC in their respective groupings of physiological and growth parameters, but the magnitude of ROS and antioxidative enzymes was variable. The experimental findings depict that both the cultivars of mung bean showed contrasting response against EC and paved the way for selecting the suitable cultivar having higher productivity in a future high‐ CO 2 environment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 reduced ROS, membrane disruption and antioxidant enzyme activities.

Taxon
Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
elevated CO 2e0
Outcome
reactive oxygen species ( ROS ) levels, membrane disruption and activities of superoxide dismutase and catalasee0
Direction
down‐regulatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under elevated CO 2 , marked down‐regulation of reactive oxygen species ( ROS ) levels, membrane disruption and activities of superoxide dismutase and catalase were noticed in both the cultivars, but the extent of reduction was more in HUM ‐6”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–930 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mung Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The reduction was greater in HUM ‐6 than in HUM ‐2.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatae1
Material
HUM ‐6e0
Outcome
extent of reductione0
Direction
moree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the extent of reduction was more in HUM ‐6”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–930 · show in text ↑
e1

“two mung bean cultivars ( HUM ‐2 and HUM ‐6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–480 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased chlorophyll and photosynthetic rate.

Taxon
Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
ECe0
Outcome
total chlorophyll, photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
ambient CO 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As compared to ambient CO 2 , EC increased total chlorophyll, photosynthetic rate, growth and yield parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1042 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mung Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased growth and yield parameters.

Taxon
Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
ECe0
Outcome
growth and yield parameterse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
ambient CO 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As compared to ambient CO 2 , EC increased total chlorophyll, photosynthetic rate, growth and yield parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1042 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mung Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HUM ‐6 had a greater yield-attribute increase than HUM ‐2.

Taxon
Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
Material
HUM ‐6e0
Outcome
yield attributese0
Direction
higher increasee0
Comparator
HUM ‐2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HUM ‐6 showed higher increase in yield attributes than HUM ‐2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1147 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mung Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 treatment decreased soluble protein and reducing sugars.

Taxon
Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
CO 2 treatmente0
Outcome
soluble protein and reducing sugarse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under CO 2 treatment, soluble protein and reducing sugars decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1216 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mung Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 treatment increased total soluble sugars and starch.

Taxon
Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
CO 2 treatmente0
Outcome
total soluble sugars and starche0
Direction
opposite trende0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under CO 2 treatment, soluble protein and reducing sugars decreased while total soluble sugars and starch showed an opposite trend”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1279 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mung Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cultivars responded similarly in physiological and growth parameter groupings.

Taxon
Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
Outcome
groupings of physiological and growth parameterse0
Direction
similarlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both the cultivars responded more or less similarly to EC in their respective groupings of physiological and growth parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1448 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mung Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ROS and antioxidant enzyme magnitudes varied between cultivars.

Taxon
Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
Outcome
magnitude of ROS and antioxidative enzymese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the magnitude of ROS and antioxidative enzymes was variable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1454–1513 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mung Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑

co2 · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

co2 · physiology: photosynthesis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.