Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Influence of preceding crops and nutrient management on productivity of wheat (Triticum aestivum)based cropping system

V.P. USADADIYA; R.H. PATEL

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
6
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during 2007-08 and 2008-09 at Anand to study the productivity and soil fertil- ity as affected by preceding crops and nutrient management in wheat [Triticum aestivum (L.) emend. Paol & Fiori] based cropping system. The experiment was laid out in a split plot design with three replications, keeping three preceding crops maize [Zea mays (L.)], soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] and greengram [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] in main plots and two levels of vermicompost (0 and 2.0 t/ha vermicompost), two nitrogen levels (60 and 120 kg N/ha) and two levels of phosphorus (0 and 17.6 kg P/ha) in sub-plots. Growing soybean and greengram as the preceding crops resulted significantly higher grain and straw yields of wheat than preceding maize crop. Among the different cropping sequences, maximum system productivity in terms of wheat grain equivalent yield (WGEY) was recorded with soybeanwheat, which was 20.3 and 43.9% higher than that of greengramwheat (6.85 t/ha) and maizewheat (5.73 t/ha). Nutrient management in wheat crop produced the highest grain yield (3.60 t/ha), straw yield (5.39 t/ha) and harvest index (39.6%) of wheat under 2.0 t/ha vermicompost, which was 4.9% more over control (3.43 t/ha). Application of 120 kg N/ha and 17.6 kg P/ha were optimum for securing maxi- mum grain yield of wheat (3.67 t/ha) and net returns ( 38,469/ha). Soybeanwheat crop sequence secured maxi- mum net returns, WGEY, production efficiency and land use efficiency, when crop fertilized with 120 kg N and 17.6 kg P/ha.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean and greengram as preceding crops significantly increased wheat grain and straw yields compared with preceding maize.

Treatment
Growing soybean and greengram as the preceding cropse2
Outcome
grain and straw yieldse2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
preceding maize crope2
Setting
Anande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during 2007-08 and 2008-09 at Anand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat [Triticum aestivum (L.) emend. Paol & Fiori] based cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–246 · show in text ↑
e2

“Growing soybean and greengram as the preceding crops resulted significantly higher grain and straw yields of wheat than preceding maize crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–774 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The soybeanwheat sequence gave wheat grain equivalent yield 20.3% higher than greengramwheat.

Treatment
soybeanwheate3
Outcome
wheat grain equivalent yield (WGEY)e3
Direction
highere3
Value
20.3e3
Qualifier
6.85 t/hae3
Comparator
greengramwheate3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat [Triticum aestivum (L.) emend. Paol & Fiori] based cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–246 · show in text ↑
e3

“maximum system productivity in terms of wheat grain equivalent yield (WGEY) was recorded with soybeanwheat, which was 20.3 and 43.9% higher than that of greengramwheat (6.85 t/ha) and maizewheat (5.73 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–1022 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The soybeanwheat sequence gave wheat grain equivalent yield 43.9% higher than maizewheat.

Treatment
soybeanwheate3
Outcome
wheat grain equivalent yield (WGEY)e3
Direction
highere3
Value
43.9%e3
Qualifier
5.73 t/hae3
Comparator
maizewheate3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat [Triticum aestivum (L.) emend. Paol & Fiori] based cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–246 · show in text ↑
e3

“maximum system productivity in terms of wheat grain equivalent yield (WGEY) was recorded with soybeanwheat, which was 20.3 and 43.9% higher than that of greengramwheat (6.85 t/ha) and maizewheat (5.73 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–1022 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost at 2.0 t/ha gave the highest wheat grain yield (3.60 t/ha), 4.9% more than control.

Treatment
2.0 t/ha vermicomposte4
Outcome
grain yielde4
Direction
higheste4
Value
3.60 t/hae4
Qualifier
4.9% more over control (3.43 t/ha)e4
Comparator
controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat [Triticum aestivum (L.) emend. Paol & Fiori] based cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–246 · show in text ↑
e4

“Nutrient management in wheat crop produced the highest grain yield (3.60 t/ha), straw yield (5.39 t/ha) and harvest index (39.6%) of wheat under 2.0 t/ha vermicompost, which was 4.9% more over control (3.43 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1236 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost at 2.0 t/ha gave the highest wheat straw yield (5.39 t/ha).

Treatment
2.0 t/ha vermicomposte4
Outcome
straw yielde4
Direction
higheste4
Value
5.39 t/hae4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat [Triticum aestivum (L.) emend. Paol & Fiori] based cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–246 · show in text ↑
e4

“Nutrient management in wheat crop produced the highest grain yield (3.60 t/ha), straw yield (5.39 t/ha) and harvest index (39.6%) of wheat under 2.0 t/ha vermicompost, which was 4.9% more over control (3.43 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1236 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost at 2.0 t/ha gave the highest wheat harvest index (39.6%).

Treatment
2.0 t/ha vermicomposte4
Outcome
harvest indexe4
Direction
higheste4
Value
39.6%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat [Triticum aestivum (L.) emend. Paol & Fiori] based cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–246 · show in text ↑
e4

“Nutrient management in wheat crop produced the highest grain yield (3.60 t/ha), straw yield (5.39 t/ha) and harvest index (39.6%) of wheat under 2.0 t/ha vermicompost, which was 4.9% more over control (3.43 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1236 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 120 kg N/ha and 17.6 kg P/ha was optimum for maximum wheat grain yield (3.67 t/ha).

Treatment
120 kg N/ha and 17.6 kg P/hae5
Outcome
grain yielde5
Value
3.67 t/hae5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat [Triticum aestivum (L.) emend. Paol & Fiori] based cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–246 · show in text ↑
e5

“Application of 120 kg N/ha and 17.6 kg P/ha were optimum for securing maxi- mum grain yield of wheat (3.67 t/ha) and net returns ( 38,469/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1379 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The same 120 kg N/ha and 17.6 kg P/ha rates were optimum for maximum net returns (38,469/ha).

Treatment
120 kg N/ha and 17.6 kg P/hae5
Outcome
net returnse5
Value
38,469/hae5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat [Triticum aestivum (L.) emend. Paol & Fiori] based cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–246 · show in text ↑
e5

“Application of 120 kg N/ha and 17.6 kg P/ha were optimum for securing maxi- mum grain yield of wheat (3.67 t/ha) and net returns ( 38,469/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1379 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The soybeanwheat sequence with 120 kg N and 17.6 kg P/ha secured maximum net returns and WGEY.

Treatment
120 kg N and 17.6 kg P/hae6
Outcome
net returns, WGEYe6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat [Triticum aestivum (L.) emend. Paol & Fiori] based cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–246 · show in text ↑
e6

“Soybeanwheat crop sequence secured maxi- mum net returns, WGEY, production efficiency and land use efficiency, when crop fertilized with 120 kg N and 17.6 kg P/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1381–1543 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The soybeanwheat sequence with 120 kg N and 17.6 kg P/ha secured maximum production efficiency and land use efficiency.

Treatment
120 kg N and 17.6 kg P/hae6
Outcome
production efficiency and land use efficiencye6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat [Triticum aestivum (L.) emend. Paol & Fiori] based cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–246 · show in text ↑
e6

“Soybeanwheat crop sequence secured maxi- mum net returns, WGEY, production efficiency and land use efficiency, when crop fertilized with 120 kg N and 17.6 kg P/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1381–1543 · show in text ↑

Vigna radiata var. radiata · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Glycine max · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 45 positive, 16 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

rotation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 253 positive, 92 negative or no effect

252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 83 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

341 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.