Paper · 2012 · Progressive Agriculture

Effect of moisture stress on plant water relations and yield of different wheat genotypes.

Bupesh Kumar; Brij B. Gupta

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Moisture stress is a major constraint for wheat productivity throughout the world. To generate information on the effect of moisture stress on various traits which contribute for yield would be helpful in developing tolerant genotypes. An experiment was conducted with eight varieties of wheat grown under normal irrigation (E1) and moisture stress (E2) environments, to identify the effect of different soil moisture regimes on flag leaf area, relative water content (RWC), proline content and grain yield. Flag leaf area, RWC, proline content and grain yield decreased significantly under moisture stress (E2) environment, compared to irrigated (E1) environment. Genotypes PBW 175, RSP 81, PBW 500, K 9943 and HUW 576 produced more grain yield/plant than RSP 303, WH 542 and RSP 312 under E2 environment. These cultivars may ultimately prove to be outstanding under moisture stress conditions since these are able to produce highest leaf area, grain yield/plant, number of tillers/plant, 1000 grain weight, minimum reduction in RWC and more accumulation of proline content. Drought susceptibility index (DSI) of these cultivars also exhibited least values. DSI, RWC and proline content could be taken as important criteria for breeding wheat genotypes for moisture stress conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Flag leaf area, RWC and proline content decreased significantly under moisture stress compared with irrigation.

Treatment
moisture stress (E2) environmente0
Outcome
Flag leaf area, RWC, proline contente0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
irrigated (E1) environmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“different wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“Flag leaf area, RWC, proline content and grain yield decreased significantly under moisture stress (E2) environment, compared to irrigated (E1) environment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–663 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield decreased significantly under moisture stress compared with irrigation.

Treatment
moisture stress (E2) environmente0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
irrigated (E1) environmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“different wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“Flag leaf area, RWC, proline content and grain yield decreased significantly under moisture stress (E2) environment, compared to irrigated (E1) environment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–663 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes PBW 175, RSP 81, PBW 500, K 9943 and HUW 576 yielded more grain per plant than RSP 303, WH 542 and RSP 312 under moisture stress.

Material
PBW 175, RSP 81, PBW 500, K 9943 and HUW 576e1
Treatment
E2 environmente1
Outcome
grain yield/plante1
Direction
moree1
Comparator
RSP 303, WH 542 and RSP 312e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“different wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“Genotypes PBW 175, RSP 81, PBW 500, K 9943 and HUW 576 produced more grain yield/plant than RSP 303, WH 542 and RSP 312 under E2 environment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–805 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under moisture stress the selected cultivars produced the highest leaf area, grain yield per plant and tiller number.

Treatment
moisture stress conditionse2
Outcome
leaf area, grain yield/plant, number of tillers/plante2
Direction
higheste2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“different wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–89 · show in text ↑
e2

“These cultivars may ultimately prove to be outstanding under moisture stress conditions since these are able to produce highest leaf area, grain yield/plant, number of tillers/plant, 1000 grain weight, minimum reduction in RWC and more accumulation of proline content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–1074 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under moisture stress the selected cultivars produced the highest 1000-grain weight.

Treatment
moisture stress conditionse2
Outcome
1000 grain weighte2
Direction
higheste2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“different wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–89 · show in text ↑
e2

“These cultivars may ultimately prove to be outstanding under moisture stress conditions since these are able to produce highest leaf area, grain yield/plant, number of tillers/plant, 1000 grain weight, minimum reduction in RWC and more accumulation of proline content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–1074 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The selected cultivars showed the minimum reduction in RWC under moisture stress.

Treatment
moisture stress conditionse2
Outcome
reduction in RWCe2
Direction
minimume2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“different wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–89 · show in text ↑
e2

“These cultivars may ultimately prove to be outstanding under moisture stress conditions since these are able to produce highest leaf area, grain yield/plant, number of tillers/plant, 1000 grain weight, minimum reduction in RWC and more accumulation of proline content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–1074 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The selected cultivars accumulated more proline under moisture stress.

Treatment
moisture stress conditionse2
Outcome
accumulation of proline contente2
Direction
moree2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“different wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–89 · show in text ↑
e2

“These cultivars may ultimately prove to be outstanding under moisture stress conditions since these are able to produce highest leaf area, grain yield/plant, number of tillers/plant, 1000 grain weight, minimum reduction in RWC and more accumulation of proline content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–1074 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The drought susceptibility index of the selected cultivars was the least under moisture stress.

Treatment
moisture stress conditionse2
Outcome
Drought susceptibility index (DSI)e3
Direction
leaste3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“different wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–89 · show in text ↑
e2

“These cultivars may ultimately prove to be outstanding under moisture stress conditions since these are able to produce highest leaf area, grain yield/plant, number of tillers/plant, 1000 grain weight, minimum reduction in RWC and more accumulation of proline content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–1074 · show in text ↑
e3

“Drought susceptibility index (DSI) of these cultivars also exhibited least values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1157 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

DSI, RWC and proline content are proposed as important selection criteria for breeding wheat for moisture stress conditions.

Outcome
important criteria for breeding wheat genotypes for moisture stress conditionse4
Qualifier
DSI, RWC and proline contente4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“different wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–89 · show in text ↑
e4

“DSI, RWC and proline content could be taken as important criteria for breeding wheat genotypes for moisture stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1284 · show in text ↑

climate site · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

climate site · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

154 papers: 72 positive, 82 negative or no effect

81 papers in the same direction as this paper · 72 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

150 papers more in this group

See all 154 papers →

drought · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

206 papers: 60 positive, 146 negative or no effect

145 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

202 papers more in this group

See all 206 papers →

drought · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

632 papers: 95 positive, 537 negative or no effect

536 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

628 papers more in this group

See all 632 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.