Paper · 2007 · Helia

Effect of cultivation measures on index of photosynthesis and yield of sunflower

I. Aksyonov

5
claims
5
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Photosynthetic activity is the decisive factor of yield increase in sunflower plants. This activity determines the application of agrotechnical measures such as row spacing and plant density. Experiments have proved that agrotechnical measures allow to control the growth, development and yield of sunflower hybrids and varieties. Row spacing and plants density affect the index of photosynthesis and the yield of sunflower agrophytocoenoses. Cultivation of sunflower at the row spacing of 15 cm in different variants of plants density increased the yield of the hybrid Zaporozhskiy 9 by 0.11-0.70 t/ha, of the hybrid Kharkovskiy 58 by 0.62-1.1 t/ha, of the variety Lider by 0.24-0.59 t/ha, of the variety Prometey by 0.20-0.63 t/ha as compared with the cultivation in agrophytocoenoces at the row spacing of 70 cm.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Row spacing and density affected sunflower photosynthesis index.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
Row spacing and plants densitye0
Outcome
index of photosynthesise0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Row spacing and plants density affect the index of photosynthesis and the yield of sunflower agrophytocoenoses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–442 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 15 cm versus 70 cm row spacing, Zaporozhskiy 9 yield increased 0.11-0.70 t/ha.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Material
Zaporozhskiy 9e0
Treatment
row spacing of 15 cme0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.11-0.70 t/hae0
Comparator
row spacing of 70 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivation of sunflower at the row spacing of 15 cm in different variants of plants density increased the yield of the hybrid Zaporozhskiy 9 by 0.11-0.70 t/ha, of the hybrid Kharkovskiy 58 by 0.62-1.1 t/ha, of the variety Lider by 0.24-0.59 t/ha, of the variety Prometey by 0.20-0.63 t/ha as compared with the cultivation in agrophytocoenoces at the row spacing of 70 cm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 15 cm versus 70 cm row spacing, Kharkovskiy 58 yield increased 0.62-1.1 t/ha.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Material
Kharkovskiy 58e0
Treatment
row spacing of 15 cme0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.62-1.1 t/hae0
Comparator
row spacing of 70 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivation of sunflower at the row spacing of 15 cm in different variants of plants density increased the yield of the hybrid Zaporozhskiy 9 by 0.11-0.70 t/ha, of the hybrid Kharkovskiy 58 by 0.62-1.1 t/ha, of the variety Lider by 0.24-0.59 t/ha, of the variety Prometey by 0.20-0.63 t/ha as compared with the cultivation in agrophytocoenoces at the row spacing of 70 cm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 15 cm versus 70 cm row spacing, Lider yield increased 0.24-0.59 t/ha.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Material
Lidere0
Treatment
row spacing of 15 cme0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.24-0.59 t/hae0
Comparator
row spacing of 70 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivation of sunflower at the row spacing of 15 cm in different variants of plants density increased the yield of the hybrid Zaporozhskiy 9 by 0.11-0.70 t/ha, of the hybrid Kharkovskiy 58 by 0.62-1.1 t/ha, of the variety Lider by 0.24-0.59 t/ha, of the variety Prometey by 0.20-0.63 t/ha as compared with the cultivation in agrophytocoenoces at the row spacing of 70 cm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 15 cm versus 70 cm row spacing, Prometey yield increased 0.20-0.63 t/ha.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Material
Prometeye0
Treatment
row spacing of 15 cme0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.20-0.63 t/hae0
Comparator
row spacing of 70 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivation of sunflower at the row spacing of 15 cm in different variants of plants density increased the yield of the hybrid Zaporozhskiy 9 by 0.11-0.70 t/ha, of the hybrid Kharkovskiy 58 by 0.62-1.1 t/ha, of the variety Lider by 0.24-0.59 t/ha, of the variety Prometey by 0.20-0.63 t/ha as compared with the cultivation in agrophytocoenoces at the row spacing of 70 cm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–815 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

85 papers: 70 positive, 15 negative or no effect

69 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.