Paper · 2013 · Notulae Scientia Biologicae

Performance of Jatropha curcas L. in Semi-arid Zone: Seed Germination, Seedling Growth and Early Field Growth

Sharif AHAMAD; Soumai Kant JOSHI; Mohommad ARIF; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

There is a lack of information on basic agronomic properties of Jatropha curcas L. (jatropha) cultivation on the marginal lands in the semi-arids. Evaluation of agronomic performance of identified elite strains of J. curcas in marginal lands would be of paramount importance for addressing gap areas in their agronomic properties and subsequently for harnessing their optimum economic potentials. The present study undertook the task of analysing the growth performance of a high oil bearing elite strain of J. curcas–DARL-2 in degraded land in semi-arid zone of Deccan Plateau, India. While undertaking the assessment of growth performance of elite strain DARL-2, two other native (wild) strains (namely AHN-1 and AHN-2) of J. curcas were also considered so that a comparative evaluation could be carried out. The role of gypsum was also investigated on J. curcas in the nursery stage as well its carry over effects on growth performance of transplanted trees in the field. Two types of substrates, gypsum-treated soil (GS) and untreated soil (SL) were used for growing seedlings of all the three jatropha strains. Seedlings (120-days-old) of DARL-2 exhibited greater plant height, collar diameter and number of branches but root length was greater in the local strains. In the second year of field transplantation, DARL-2 strain exhibited significantly (p<0.05) greater plant height and number of branches/plant. No carry over effects of gypsum treatment were observed in field transplanted plants as none of the growth parameters significantly varied among the substrate types.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DARL-2 seedlings had greater height, collar diameter and branch number than local strains.

Taxon
Jatropha curcas L.Jatropha curcast0
Material
DARL-2e0
Organ / stage
Seedlings (120-days-old)e0
Outcome
plant height, collar diameter and number of branchese0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
local strainse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings (120-days-old) of DARL-2 exhibited greater plant height, collar diameter and number of branches but root length was greater in the local strains.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1271 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Local strains had longer seedling roots than DARL-2.

Taxon
Jatropha curcas L.Jatropha curcast0
Material
local strainse0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
DARL-2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings (120-days-old) of DARL-2 exhibited greater plant height, collar diameter and number of branches but root length was greater in the local strains.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1271 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

DARL-2 had significantly greater field height and branches in the second year.

Taxon
Jatropha curcas L.Jatropha curcast0
Material
DARL-2e0
Outcome
plant height and number of branches/plante0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
second year of field transplantatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the second year of field transplantation, DARL-2 strain exhibited significantly (p<0.05) greater plant height and number of branches/plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1414 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nursery gypsum had no significant carryover effect on transplanted plant growth parameters.

Taxon
Jatropha curcas L.Jatropha curcast0
Treatment
gypsum treatmente0
Outcome
growth parameterse0
Direction
No carry over effectse0
Comparator
substrate typese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No carry over effects of gypsum treatment were observed in field transplanted plants as none of the growth parameters significantly varied among the substrate types.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1415–1580 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–33 · show in text ↑

lime · growth · Jatropha curcasPositive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.