Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during Kharifseason 2007 to study the effect of two levels of FYM (0 and 10 t ha−1), three levels of nitrogen (80,100 and 120 kg ha−l)and two levels of biofertilizer (without inoculation and with Azospirillum brasillense inoculation jon forage yield and quality. Results showed that increasing levels of FYM increased the green forage yield and quality (crude protein and crude fibre content). Application of FYM @ 10 t ha−1 recorded highest total green forage yield (476.64 q ha−1), and with, no FYM produced (444.42 q ha−1). Higher values of crude protein and lowest values of crude fibre content were also observed by application of FYM @ 10 t ha−1 during both the cuts. Increasing levels of nitrogen up to 100 kg ha−1 significantly increased the total green forage yield and crude protein content in both the cuts but in case of crude fibre content higher values was observed by 80 kg N ha−l. Seed inoculation with Azospirillum brasillense significantly increased green forage yield. In case of quality parameters Azospirillum inoculation failed to exert any significant effect on crude protein and crude fibre content.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
FYM at 10 t ha−1 gave the highest total green forage yield (476.64 q ha−1) versus 444.42 q ha−1 with no FYM.
Verbatim
t0“FORAGE PEARL MILLET”
e0“Application of FYM @ 10 t ha−1 recorded highest total green forage yield (476.64 q ha−1), and with, no FYM produced (444.42 q ha−1)”
Claim · model-written summary
FYM at 10 t ha−1 gave higher crude protein values during both cuts.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“FORAGE PEARL MILLET”
e0“Higher values of crude protein and lowest values of crude fibre content were also observed by application of FYM @ 10 t ha−1 during both the cuts”
Claim · model-written summary
FYM at 10 t ha−1 gave the lowest crude fibre content during both cuts.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“FORAGE PEARL MILLET”
e0“Higher values of crude protein and lowest values of crude fibre content were also observed by application of FYM @ 10 t ha−1 during both the cuts”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing nitrogen up to 100 kg ha−1 significantly increased total green forage yield and crude protein content in both cuts.
- Taxon
- FORAGE PEARL MILLETt0
- Treatment
- Increasing levels of nitrogen up to 100 kg ha−1e0
- Outcome
- total green forage yield and crude protein contente0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“FORAGE PEARL MILLET”
e0“Increasing levels of nitrogen up to 100 kg ha−1 significantly increased the total green forage yield and crude protein content in both the cuts”
Claim · model-written summary
Crude fibre content was higher with 80 kg N ha−1.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“FORAGE PEARL MILLET”
e0“in case of crude fibre content higher values was observed by 80 kg N ha−l”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed inoculation with Azospirillum brasillense significantly increased green forage yield.
- Taxon
- FORAGE PEARL MILLETt0
- Treatment
- Seed inoculation with Azospirillum brasillensee0
- Interactor
- Azospirillum brasillensee0symbiont
- Outcome
- green forage yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“FORAGE PEARL MILLET”
e0“Seed inoculation with Azospirillum brasillense significantly increased green forage yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Azospirillum inoculation had no significant effect on crude protein and crude fibre content.
- Taxon
- FORAGE PEARL MILLETt0
- Treatment
- Azospirillum inoculatione0
- Interactor
- Azospirillum
Azospirillume0symbiont - Outcome
- crude protein and crude fibre contente0
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“FORAGE PEARL MILLET”
e0“Azospirillum inoculation failed to exert any significant effect on crude protein and crude fibre content”
The same questions in other papers
Azospirillum · quality: protein · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- positive
Azospirillum · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree
19 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →inoculation · quality: protein · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results
6 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →fertilization · quality: grain · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →nitrogen · quality: protein · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results
26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
25 papers more in this group
See all 29 papers →inoculation · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results
50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
51 papers more in this group
See all 55 papers →fertilization · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results
248 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- negative
255 papers more in this group
See all 259 papers →fertilization · quality: protein · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree
42 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
39 papers more in this group
See all 43 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.