Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Azotobacter inoculation significantly increased protein content.

A claim from Effect of Azotobacter on growth, yield and quality of pearl millet · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Azotobacter inoculation significantly increased protein content.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
seed inoculation with Azotobactere0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
without inoculatione1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed inoculation with Azotobacter significantly increased plant height, dry matter accumulation, total number of tillers, chlorophyll content effective tillers, ear length, grains/ear, test weight, grain, stover and biological yield, protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–923
e1

“without inoculation and with Azotobacter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–460
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–66

Title

Effect of Azotobacter on growth, yield and quality of pearl millet

Ramdev Togas; LR Yadav; SL Choudhary; et al. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2017

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-b2f8beb91c8ffde9bc24a2afbd345d3d527d6c7216a7871404d87ad56751eed9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

Azotobacter · quality: protein · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · quality: protein · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.