Abstract
Pruning is essential operation for the production of quality and quantity fruits. From the finding, it is found that the number of secondary and tertiary shoots were maximum with 50% intensity and 20th April timing which gave maximum fruit yield. However, plant height and canopy spread were not much affected by the time and severity of pruning. The stem diameter was recorded maximum with 25% intensity and 20th April timing. Similarly, 25% intensity took less time for sprouting than the 50% and 75% pruning intensity. Further, April pruning took less time in sprouting than the May pruning.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Secondary and tertiary shoots were maximal with 50% pruning on 20 April.
- Taxon
- ber
Ziziphus mauritianat0 - Treatment
- 50% intensity and 20th April timinge0
- Outcome
- number of secondary and tertiary shootse0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the number of secondary and tertiary shoots were maximum with 50% intensity and 20th April timing”
t0“ber (Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk)”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit yield was maximal with 50% pruning on 20 April.
- Taxon
- berZiziphus mauritianat0
- Treatment
- 50% intensity and 20th April timinge0
- Outcome
- fruit yielde0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“50% intensity and 20th April timing which gave maximum fruit yield”
t0“ber (Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk)”
Claim · model-written summary
Pruning timing and severity had little effect on plant height and canopy spread.
- Taxon
- berZiziphus mauritianat0
- Treatment
- time and severity of pruninge0
- Outcome
- plant height and canopy spreade0
- Direction
- not much affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“plant height and canopy spread were not much affected by the time and severity of pruning”
t0“ber (Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk)”
Claim · model-written summary
Stem diameter was maximal with 25% pruning on 20 April.
- Taxon
- berZiziphus mauritianat0
- Treatment
- 25% intensity and 20th April timinge0
- Outcome
- stem diametere0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The stem diameter was recorded maximum with 25% intensity and 20th April timing”
t0“ber (Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk)”
Claim · model-written summary
25% pruning shortened time to sprouting compared with 50% and 75% pruning.
- Taxon
- berZiziphus mauritianat0
- Treatment
- 25% intensitye0
- Outcome
- time for sproutinge0
- Direction
- lesse0
- Comparator
- 50% and 75% pruning intensitye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“25% intensity took less time for sprouting than the 50% and 75% pruning intensity”
t0“ber (Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk)”
Claim · model-written summary
April pruning shortened time to sprouting compared with May pruning.
- Taxon
- berZiziphus mauritianat0
- Treatment
- April pruninge0
- Outcome
- time in sproutinge0
- Direction
- lesse0
- Comparator
- May pruninge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“April pruning took less time in sprouting than the May pruning”
t0“ber (Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk)”
The same questions in other papers
pruning · growth · Ziziphus mauritiana (ber)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →pruning · quality: postharvest · Ziziphus mauritiana (ber)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.