Abstract
This essay studies the morphological and anatomical properties of the leaves of Garnacha tinta, Tempranillo, Chardonnay and Airén grapevines in order to discover the drought adaptation strategies present in Vitis vinifera L. The grapevines were grown under two water availability conditions: water limitation and non-water limitation. There was a significantly lower development of leaf area under conditions of water limitation compared to non-water limitation due to a reduction in the size of main and lateral shoot leaves, and a smaller number of leaves on lateral shoots. The development of the leaf area under water limitation conditions occurred on earlier dates than under non-water limitation conditions. Significantly lower stomatal density was observed under water limitation conditions rather than non-water limitation conditions exclusively in the Airén cultivar.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Water limitation significantly reduced leaf area compared with unrestricted water.
- Taxon
- Vitis vinifera L.
Vitis viniferat0 - Treatment
- water limitatione0
- Outcome
- development of leaf areae0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Comparator
- non-water limitatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“There was a significantly lower development of leaf area under conditions of water limitation compared to non-water limitation”
t0“grapevine cultivars (Vitis vinifera L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Water limitation reduced main and lateral shoot leaf size.
- Taxon
- Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
- Treatment
- water limitatione1
- Outcome
- size of main and lateral shoot leavese0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Comparator
- non-water limitatione1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“a reduction in the size of main and lateral shoot leaves”
e1“under conditions of water limitation compared to non-water limitation”
t0“grapevine cultivars (Vitis vinifera L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Water limitation reduced number of leaves on lateral shoots.
- Taxon
- Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
- Treatment
- water limitatione1
- Outcome
- number of leaves on lateral shootse0
- Direction
- smallere0
- Comparator
- non-water limitatione1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“a smaller number of leaves on lateral shoots”
e1“under conditions of water limitation compared to non-water limitation”
t0“grapevine cultivars (Vitis vinifera L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Leaf area developed earlier under water limitation than unrestricted water.
- Taxon
- Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
- Treatment
- water limitatione0
- Outcome
- development of the leaf areae0
- Direction
- earliere0
- Comparator
- non-water limitatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The development of the leaf area under water limitation conditions occurred on earlier dates than under non-water limitation conditions.”
t0“grapevine cultivars (Vitis vinifera L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Airén had significantly lower stomatal density under water limitation.
- Taxon
- Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
- Material
- Airéne0
- Treatment
- water limitatione0
- Outcome
- stomatal densitye0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Comparator
- non-water limitatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Significantly lower stomatal density was observed under water limitation conditions rather than non-water limitation conditions exclusively in the Airén cultivar.”
t0“grapevine cultivars (Vitis vinifera L.)”
The same questions in other papers
drought · growth · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.