Paper · 1991 · Indian Journal of Horticulture

Studies on storage of mango pulp

Vijay Sethi; S. Maini

11
claims
24
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Glass bottles were found more suitable than PVC, HOPE or HMHO film for storage of mango pulp. The pulp was organoleptically acceptable upto 1 year in glass bottles, 7–8 months in PVC bottles, 2 months in HOPE and 45 days in HMHO pouches. Addition of sodium benzoate to 502 (KMS) was found equally effective for the retention of colour but in its presence, there was a slight increase in non-enzymatic browning and decrease in carotenoid pigments in pulps during storage. Addition of 502 alone helped in better retention of carotenoids and flavour during storage. Low temperature also helped in better retention of carotenoids as well as reduction in non-enzymatic browning in the pulp.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glass bottles were more suitable for storage of mango pulp than PVC, HOPE or HMHO film.

Treatment
Glass bottlese0
Outcome
more suitablee0
Direction
more suitablee0
Comparator
PVC, HOPE or HMHO filme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glass bottles were found more suitable than PVC, HOPE or HMHO film for storage of mango pulp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–93 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango pulp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–32 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mango pulp remained acceptable for up to one year in glass bottles.

Treatment
glass bottlese0
Outcome
organoleptically acceptablee0
Value
1 yeare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pulp was organoleptically acceptable upto 1 year in glass bottles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–163 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango pulp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–32 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mango pulp remained acceptable for 7–8 months in PVC bottles.

Treatment
PVC bottlese0
Outcome
organoleptically acceptablee0
Value
7–8 monthse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pulp was organoleptically acceptable upto 1 year in glass bottles, 7–8 months in PVC bottles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–190 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango pulp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–32 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mango pulp remained acceptable for 2 months in HOPE.

Treatment
HOPEe0
Outcome
organoleptically acceptablee0
Value
2 monthse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pulp was organoleptically acceptable upto 1 year in glass bottles, 7–8 months in PVC bottles, 2 months in HOPE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–208 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango pulp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–32 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mango pulp remained acceptable for 45 days in HMHO pouches.

Treatment
HMHO pouchese0
Outcome
organoleptically acceptablee0
Value
45 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pulp was organoleptically acceptable upto 1 year in glass bottles, 7–8 months in PVC bottles, 2 months in HOPE and 45 days in HMHO pouches.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–237 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango pulp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodium benzoate added to 502 (KMS) was equally effective for colour retention.

Treatment
sodium benzoatee0
Outcome
retention of coloure0
Direction
equally effectivee0
Comparator
502 (KMS)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of sodium benzoate to 502 (KMS) was found equally effective for the retention of colour”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–334 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango pulp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodium benzoate increased non-enzymatic browning slightly during storage.

Treatment
sodium benzoatee1
Outcome
non-enzymatic browninge0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
slighte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in its presence, there was a slight increase in non-enzymatic browning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 339–409 · show in text ↑
e1

“Addition of sodium benzoate to 502 (KMS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–278 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango pulp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodium benzoate decreased carotenoid pigments during storage.

Treatment
sodium benzoatee1
Outcome
carotenoid pigmentse0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decrease in carotenoid pigments in pulps during storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–469 · show in text ↑
e1

“Addition of sodium benzoate to 502 (KMS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–278 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango pulp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

502 alone improved retention of carotenoids and flavour during storage.

Treatment
502 alonee0
Outcome
retention of carotenoids and flavoure0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of 502 alone helped in better retention of carotenoids and flavour during storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–562 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango pulp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low temperature improved carotenoid retention and reduced non-enzymatic browning in pulp.

Treatment
Low temperaturee0
Outcome
retention of carotenoidse0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low temperature also helped in better retention of carotenoids as well as reduction in non-enzymatic browning in the pulp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–685 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango pulp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low temperature reduced non-enzymatic browning in pulp.

Treatment
Low temperaturee0
Outcome
non-enzymatic browninge0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low temperature also helped in better retention of carotenoids as well as reduction in non-enzymatic browning in the pulp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–685 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango pulp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–32 · show in text ↑

cold · physiology: pigments · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

cold · disease · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.