Paper · 2012 · Journal of Food Processing and Preservation

Effects of Storage Temperature on 1-Methylcyclopropene-Treated Mango (Mangnifera Indica) Fruit Varieties

J. Faasema; J.S. Alakali; J.O. Abu

8
claims
32
verbatim quotes
28
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Ripening has been delayed in many fruits using 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP), an ethylene inhibitor in many parts of the world. In this study, three improved mango varieties (“Peter,” “Brokin” and “Julie”) from Benue State, Nigeria were treated with 1 and 2 ppm concentrations of 1-MCP for 24 h and stored at (32C) and (20C). Fruit quality attributes such as firmness, weight retention, titratable acidity, pH, soluble solids and ascorbic acid content were monitored at 0-, 3-, 6-, 12-, 18-, 21- and 25-day intervals. Fruit ripening was not delayed in treated fruits stored at (32C), however, fruit firmness, weight and color changes were minimized during storage. Conversely, ripening was delayed for fruits stored at 20C for up to 25 days. Titratable acidity, pH, soluble solids and ascorbic acid of the stored mango fruits were, for the most part, not affected significantly by 1-MCP treatment. The efficacy of 1-MCP in delaying mango ripening appears to be dependent on the storage temperature of treated fruits. Practical Applications The research work is aimed at minimizing the accelerated ripening of tropical mango fruits for improved shelf life.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP did not delay ripening at 32C.

Treatment
1-MCPe1
Outcome
Fruit ripeninge0
Direction
not delayede0
Setting
32Ce0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit ripening was not delayed in treated fruits stored at (32C)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–581 · show in text ↑
e1

“1-MCP treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–895 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fruit ripening was not delayed in treated fruits stored at (32C)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–581 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 32C, treatment minimized fruit firmness changes.

Treatment
1-MCPe1
Outcome
fruit firmnesse0
Direction
minimizede0
Setting
32Ce2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“however, fruit firmness, weight and color changes were minimized during storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–663 · show in text ↑
e1

“1-MCP treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–895 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fruit ripening was not delayed in treated fruits stored at (32C)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–581 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 32C, treatment minimized fruit weight changes.

Treatment
1-MCPe1
Outcome
weighte0
Direction
minimizede0
Setting
32Ce2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“however, fruit firmness, weight and color changes were minimized during storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–663 · show in text ↑
e1

“1-MCP treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–895 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fruit ripening was not delayed in treated fruits stored at (32C)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–581 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 32C, treatment minimized fruit color changes.

Treatment
1-MCPe1
Outcome
color changese0
Direction
minimizede0
Setting
32Ce2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“however, fruit firmness, weight and color changes were minimized during storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–663 · show in text ↑
e1

“1-MCP treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–895 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fruit ripening was not delayed in treated fruits stored at (32C)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–581 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 20C, ripening was delayed for up to 25 days.

Treatment
1-MCPe1
Outcome
ripeninge0
Direction
delayede0
Value
up to 25 dayse0
Setting
20Ce0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ripening was delayed for fruits stored at 20C for up to 25 days.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–740 · show in text ↑
e1

“1-MCP treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–895 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fruit ripening was not delayed in treated fruits stored at (32C)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–581 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP did not significantly affect titratable acidity, pH or soluble solids for the most part.

Treatment
1-MCP treatmente0
Outcome
Titratable acidity, pH, soluble solidse0
Direction
not affectede0
Qualifier
for the most parte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Titratable acidity, pH, soluble solids and ascorbic acid of the stored mango fruits were, for the most part, not affected significantly by 1-MCP treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–896 · show in text ↑
e1

“1-MCP treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–895 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fruit ripening was not delayed in treated fruits stored at (32C)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–581 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP did not significantly affect ascorbic acid for the most part.

Treatment
1-MCP treatmente0
Outcome
ascorbic acide0
Direction
not affectede0
Qualifier
for the most parte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Titratable acidity, pH, soluble solids and ascorbic acid of the stored mango fruits were, for the most part, not affected significantly by 1-MCP treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–896 · show in text ↑
e1

“1-MCP treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–895 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fruit ripening was not delayed in treated fruits stored at (32C)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–581 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors interpreted 1-MCP ripening delay as dependent on storage temperature.

Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
delaying mango ripeninge0
Qualifier
dependent on the storage temperaturee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The efficacy of 1-MCP in delaying mango ripening appears to be dependent on the storage temperature of treated fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1015 · show in text ↑
e1

“1-MCP treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–895 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fruit ripening was not delayed in treated fruits stored at (32C)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–581 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–68 · show in text ↑

1-methylcyclopropene · quality: phytochemicals · Mangifera indica (mango)Results differ

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · quality: sugar starch · Mangifera indica (mango)Results differ

24 papers: 21 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · quality: postharvest · Mangifera indica (mango)Results differ

36 papers: 35 positive, 1 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.