Paper · 2014 · University of Nairobi Research Archive (University of Nairobi)

EFFICACY OF A LOW-COST AGROCHEMICAL THIDIAZURON IN INDUCTION OF REGENERATION FROM COTYLEDONS OF MELIA VOLKENSII GURKE

Eliud Sagwa Mulanda; Mark Ochieng Adero; Nelson O. Amugune; et al.

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Mass propagation via tissue culture technology could rescue threatened indigenous medicinal, pesticidal and timber plants. However, its application remains underutilized locally due to high costs of tissue culture consumables. Local efforts towards reduction of costs have centered on use of cheaper carbon sources such as table sugar, substitution of Murashige and Skoog and Gamborg’s salts with mixtures of fertilizers and substitution of conventional gelling agents agar, gelrite and phytogel with cassava starch. However, a gap exists on the identification of cheaper substitutes of conventional plant growth promoters yet these, particularly cytokinins, are important cost drivers in tissue culture. Half a gram of plant-cell-culture-tested Thidiazuron (TDZ) from Sigma-Aldrich costs 2,145 Euros (Ksh 235,500) while 1 g of Zeatin costs 4,220 Euros (Ksh 463,514). This study sought to determine whether a low-cost agrochemical TDZ that costed only 0.229 USD (Ksh 19.84) per gram and was recently reported by the present authors to support high frequency regeneration in mature zygotic embryos of M. volkensii, could elicit similar response in other explants. Cotyledons of mature seeds from wild trees in Kitui were cultured in ½ MS medium containing eight TDZ concentrations from 0 to 4 mg/l. High frequency (80 to 100 %) direct regeneration of shoots was observed within 14 days. TDZ treatments had a significant effect (Ftestp < 0.001) on the regeneration response in relation to the non-morphogenic controls. Shoots were elongated on ½ MS + 0.1 mg/l 6-Benzylaminopurine in combination with either 0.01 mg/l 1AA or 10% coconut water and rooted in ½ MS + 0.1 mg/l Indole-3-butyric acid. Low-cost agrochemical TDZ could substitute the exorbitant plant-cell-culture-tested Thidiazuron in tissue culture of M. volkensii. We recommend testing of this agrochemical on more explants and species.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotyledons showed 80 to 100 % direct shoot regeneration within 14 days.

Taxon
MELIA VOLKENSII GURKEt0
Organ / stage
shootse0
Outcome
direct regeneration of shootse0
Value
80 to 100 %e0
Qualifier
within 14 dayse0

Verbatim

e0

“High frequency (80 to 100 %) direct regeneration of shoots was observed within 14 days.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1385 · show in text ↑
t0

“MELIA VOLKENSII GURKE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TDZ significantly affected regeneration relative to non-morphogenic controls.

Taxon
MELIA VOLKENSII GURKEt0
Treatment
TDZ treatmentse0
Outcome
regeneration responsee0
Comparator
non-morphogenic controlse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“TDZ treatments had a significant effect (Ftestp < 0.001) on the regeneration response in relation to the non-morphogenic controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1386–1516 · show in text ↑
t0

“MELIA VOLKENSII GURKE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–117 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoots elongated under the stated benzylaminopurine combinations.

Taxon
MELIA VOLKENSII GURKEt0
Treatment
½ MS + 0.1 mg/l 6-Benzylaminopurinee0
Outcome
Shoots were elongatede0

Verbatim

e0

“Shoots were elongated on ½ MS + 0.1 mg/l 6-Benzylaminopurine in combination with either 0.01 mg/l 1AA or 10% coconut water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1517–1639 · show in text ↑
t0

“MELIA VOLKENSII GURKE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–117 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoots rooted on indole-3-butyric acid medium.

Taxon
MELIA VOLKENSII GURKEt0
Treatment
½ MS + 0.1 mg/l Indole-3-butyric acide0
Outcome
rootede0

Verbatim

e0

“rooted in ½ MS + 0.1 mg/l Indole-3-butyric acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1644–1691 · show in text ↑
t0

“MELIA VOLKENSII GURKE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–117 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors concluded low-cost TDZ could substitute plant-cell-culture-tested thidiazuron.

Taxon
M. volkensiie0
Outcome
Low-cost agrochemical TDZ could substitute the exorbitant plant-cell-culture-tested Thidiazurone0

Verbatim

e0

“Low-cost agrochemical TDZ could substitute the exorbitant plant-cell-culture-tested Thidiazuron in tissue culture of M. volkensii.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1693–1823 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend testing this agrochemical on more explants and species.

Taxon
MELIA VOLKENSII GURKEt0
Outcome
testing of this agrochemical on more explants and speciese0

Verbatim

e0

“We recommend testing of this agrochemical on more explants and species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1824–1895 · show in text ↑
t0

“MELIA VOLKENSII GURKE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–117 · show in text ↑

Thidiazuron · growth · Melia volkensiiResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.