Paper · 2012 · Legume Research - An International Journal

Effect of Organic and Inorganic Phosphorus Sources on Quality of Green Gram ( Vigna radiata L.) Under Temperate Conditions of Jammu and Kashmir

M. H. Chesti; Tahir Ali; M. Y. Bhat

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted during two consecutive kharif seasons to assess the effect of organic and inorganic phosphorus sources on quality of green gram in temperate conditions of Jammu and Kashmir. The results revealed that application of organic manures significantly improved the total soluble sugars and protein content in grain of green gram. Among organic manures, application of FYM (10 t/ha) proved significantly superior over Dalweed (15 t/ha). Soil inoculation with P-solubilizers significantly increased the protein content in grain of green gram. Among P-solubilizers, inoculation with Pseudomonas proved significantly superior over Bacillus. Increasing levels of phosphorus up to 30 kg P2O5/ha significantly improved the total soluble sugars and protein content in grain of green gram. However, further increase in phosphorus level viz., 60 kg P2O5/ha had no beneficial influence on these quality parameters of green gram.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic manure significantly improved grain total soluble sugars.

Organ / stage
graine0
Treatment
organic manurese0
Outcome
total soluble sugarse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Green Gram ( Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of organic manures significantly improved the total soluble sugars and protein content in grain of green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–354 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic manure significantly improved grain protein content.

Organ / stage
graine0
Treatment
organic manurese0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Green Gram ( Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of organic manures significantly improved the total soluble sugars and protein content in grain of green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–354 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM at 10 t/ha was significantly superior to Dalweed at 15 t/ha for the studied grain quality.

Treatment
FYM (10 t/ha)e0
Outcome
significantly superiore0
Direction
superiore0
Qualifier
15 t/hae0
Comparator
Dalweede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Green Gram ( Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of FYM (10 t/ha) proved significantly superior over Dalweed (15 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–460 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

P-solubilizer soil inoculation significantly increased grain protein content.

Organ / stage
graine0
Treatment
Soil inoculation with P-solubilizerse0
Interactor
P-solubilizerse0symbiont
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Green Gram ( Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“Soil inoculation with P-solubilizers significantly increased the protein content in grain of green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–565 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas inoculation was significantly superior to Bacillus inoculation.

Treatment
inoculation with Pseudomonase0
Interactor
PseudomonasPseudomonase0symbiont
Second interactor
Bacilluse0symbiont
Outcome
significantly superiore0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
Bacilluse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Green Gram ( Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“inoculation with Pseudomonas proved significantly superior over Bacillus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus levels up to 30 kg P2O5/ha significantly improved grain total soluble sugars.

Treatment
phosphorus up to 30 kg P2O5/hae0
Outcome
total soluble sugarse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Green Gram ( Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“Increasing levels of phosphorus up to 30 kg P2O5/ha significantly improved the total soluble sugars and protein content in grain of green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–805 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus levels up to 30 kg P2O5/ha significantly improved grain protein content.

Treatment
phosphorus up to 30 kg P2O5/hae0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Green Gram ( Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“Increasing levels of phosphorus up to 30 kg P2O5/ha significantly improved the total soluble sugars and protein content in grain of green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–805 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raising phosphorus to 60 kg P2O5/ha gave no further benefit to those grain quality parameters.

Treatment
60 kg P2O5/hae0
Outcome
quality parameterse0
Direction
no beneficial influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Green Gram ( Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“further increase in phosphorus level viz., 60 kg P2O5/ha had no beneficial influence on these quality parameters of green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–942 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: protein · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

39 papers: 37 positive, 2 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

phosphorus · quality: general · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · quality: protein · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

fertilization · physiology: osmolytes · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

phosphorus · quality: protein · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

22 papers: 22 positive, 0 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.