Abstract
Bradyrhizbium sp. was isolated from 40 legumes roots and soil samples collected from various agricultural areas of Iraq by growing them on yeast extract mannitol agar (YEMA) and identification based on culture and microscopic characteristics, biochemical and physiological test and PCR technology. A split plot experiment was carried out to study the effect of biofertilizer prepared from this isolate on the growth and yield of mungbean plant in sterile and non-sterile soil. The results showed a significant increases in all studied growth and yield traits due to biofertilization. The increase percentage for the biofertilized treatments was 159.35% and 266.66% compare to the non-fertilized treatments in the number and dry weight of nodules, respectively. The increase in dry weight of root and vegetative part were 114.28% and 86.57% respectively , while the increase in the nitrogen concentration in the vegetative part was 16.94%. The results showed that the biofertilized treatment was significantly superior in number of plant pods, total yield and protein % in seeds compare with non-biofertilized, the percentage increase was 49.44%, 90.59% and 16.86% respectively. As for sterilization, the results showed no significant differences between sterilized and non-sterile soil in all growth and yield parameters of mungbean plant. The effect of interaction was significant, the biofertilized and sterilized treatment gave the highest value for all studied traits except the concentration of nitrogen in the vegetative part.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Biofertilization significantly increased mungbean nodule number by 159.35%.
- Taxon
- mungbean
.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- biofertilized treatmentse0
- Interactor
- BRADYRHIZOBIUM SPt1symbiont
- Outcome
- numbere0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 159.35%e0
- Comparator
- non-fertilized treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The increase percentage for the biofertilized treatments was 159.35% and 266.66% compare to the non-fertilized treatments in the number and dry weight of nodules, respectively”
t0“MUNGBEAN”
t1“BRADYRHIZOBIUM SP”
Claim · model-written summary
Biofertilization increased mungbean nodule dry weight by 266.66%.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- biofertilized treatmentse0
- Interactor
- BRADYRHIZOBIUM SPt1symbiont
- Outcome
- dry weight of nodulese0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 266.66%e0
- Comparator
- non-fertilized treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The increase percentage for the biofertilized treatments was 159.35% and 266.66% compare to the non-fertilized treatments in the number and dry weight of nodules, respectively”
t0“MUNGBEAN”
t1“BRADYRHIZOBIUM SP”
Claim · model-written summary
Biofertilization increased root dry weight by 114.28%.
- Taxon
- MUNGBEANVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- BIOFERTILIZERt1
- Outcome
- dry weight of roote0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 114.28%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The increase in dry weight of root and vegetative part were 114.28% and 86.57% respectively”
t0“MUNGBEAN”
t1“BIOFERTILIZER”
Claim · model-written summary
Biofertilization increased vegetative dry weight by 86.57%.
- Taxon
- MUNGBEANVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- BIOFERTILIZERt1
- Outcome
- dry weight of root and vegetative parte0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 86.57%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The increase in dry weight of root and vegetative part were 114.28% and 86.57% respectively”
t0“MUNGBEAN”
t1“BIOFERTILIZER”
Claim · model-written summary
Biofertilization increased vegetative nitrogen concentration by 16.94%.
- Taxon
- MUNGBEANVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- BIOFERTILIZERt1
- Outcome
- nitrogen concentration in the vegetative parte0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 16.94%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the increase in the nitrogen concentration in the vegetative part was 16.94%”
t0“MUNGBEAN”
t1“BIOFERTILIZER”
Claim · model-written summary
Biofertilization increased pod number by 49.44%.
- Taxon
- MUNGBEANVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- biofertilized treatmente0
- Outcome
- number of plant podse0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 49.44%e0
- Comparator
- non-biofertilizede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the biofertilized treatment was significantly superior in number of plant pods, total yield and protein % in seeds compare with non-biofertilized, the percentage increase was 49.44%, 90.59% and 16.86% respectively”
t0“MUNGBEAN”
Claim · model-written summary
Biofertilization increased total yield by 90.59%.
- Taxon
- MUNGBEANVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- biofertilized treatmente0
- Outcome
- total yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 90.59%e0
- Comparator
- non-biofertilizede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the biofertilized treatment was significantly superior in number of plant pods, total yield and protein % in seeds compare with non-biofertilized, the percentage increase was 49.44%, 90.59% and 16.86% respectively”
t0“MUNGBEAN”
Claim · model-written summary
Biofertilization increased seed protein percentage by 16.86%.
- Taxon
- MUNGBEANVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- biofertilized treatmente0
- Outcome
- protein % in seedse0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 16.86%e0
- Comparator
- non-biofertilizede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the biofertilized treatment was significantly superior in number of plant pods, total yield and protein % in seeds compare with non-biofertilized, the percentage increase was 49.44%, 90.59% and 16.86% respectively”
t0“MUNGBEAN”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil sterilization showed no significant difference in mungbean growth and yield parameters.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatae0
- Treatment
- sterilizede0
- Outcome
- growth and yield parameterse0
- Direction
- no significant differencese0
- Comparator
- non-sterile soile0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“no significant differences between sterilized and non-sterile soil in all growth and yield parameters of mungbean plant”
Claim · model-written summary
The biofertilized and sterilized combination gave highest values for all studied traits except vegetative nitrogen concentration.
- Taxon
- MUNGBEANVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- biofertilized and sterilized treatmente0
- Outcome
- all studied traitse0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Qualifier
- except the concentration of nitrogen in the vegetative parte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the biofertilized and sterilized treatment gave the highest value for all studied traits except the concentration of nitrogen in the vegetative part”
t0“MUNGBEAN”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ
78 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
77 papers more in this group
See all 81 papers →inoculation · quality: protein · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →inoculation · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
57 papers more in this group
See all 61 papers →inoculation · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- negative
122 papers more in this group
See all 126 papers →inoculation · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
178 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
180 papers more in this group
See all 184 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.