Paper · 2003 · Legume Research - An International Journal

Response of various isolates of Bradyrhizobium inoculation on protein content and its yield atiributes of green gram [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]

Shivesh Sharma

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during kharif season of 1998 and 1999 to study the effect of different Bradyrhizobium strains inoculation on protein and yield attributes of green gram under mid-hill conditions of Himachal Pradesh, The significantly maximum test weight (g), biological yield (q/ha), grain yield (q/ha) and harvest index (%) was recorded by inoculation with local isolate of Bradyrhizobium, followed by R1, R3 and lowest value of these characters were observed in control. The protein content in seed was influenced by inoculation treatment and significantly highest protein content was noticed after R1 inoculation as compared to other strains and control where lowest protein content was recorded. None of the strain could influence the protein content in straw.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with a local Bradyrhizobium isolate gave the maximum test weight, biological yield and grain yield of green gram, versus control.

Treatment
inoculation with local isolate of Bradyrhizobiume1
Interactor
BradyrhizobiumBradyrhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
test weight (g), biological yield (q/ha), grain yield (q/ha)e1
Direction
maximume1
Comparator
controle1
Setting
mid-hill conditions of Himachal Pradeshe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Louisa Howard - Dartmouth Electron Microscope Facility · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effect of different Bradyrhizobium strains inoculation on protein and yield attributes of green gram under mid-hill conditions of Himachal Pradesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 84–230 · show in text ↑
e1

“The significantly maximum test weight (g), biological yield (q/ha), grain yield (q/ha) and harvest index (%) was recorded by inoculation with local isolate of Bradyrhizobium, followed by R1, R3 and lowest value of these characters were observed in control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–487 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with a local Bradyrhizobium isolate gave the maximum harvest index of green gram, versus control.

Treatment
inoculation with local isolate of Bradyrhizobiume1
Interactor
BradyrhizobiumBradyrhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
harvest index (%)e1
Direction
maximume1
Comparator
controle1
Setting
mid-hill conditions of Himachal Pradeshe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Louisa Howard - Dartmouth Electron Microscope Facility · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effect of different Bradyrhizobium strains inoculation on protein and yield attributes of green gram under mid-hill conditions of Himachal Pradesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 84–230 · show in text ↑
e1

“The significantly maximum test weight (g), biological yield (q/ha), grain yield (q/ha) and harvest index (%) was recorded by inoculation with local isolate of Bradyrhizobium, followed by R1, R3 and lowest value of these characters were observed in control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–487 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with R1 gave the highest seed protein content of green gram compared with other strains and control.

Treatment
R1 inoculatione2
Interactor
BradyrhizobiumBradyrhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
protein contente2
Direction
higheste2
Comparator
other strains and controle2
Setting
mid-hill conditions of Himachal Pradeshe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Louisa Howard - Dartmouth Electron Microscope Facility · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effect of different Bradyrhizobium strains inoculation on protein and yield attributes of green gram under mid-hill conditions of Himachal Pradesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 84–230 · show in text ↑
e2

“significantly highest protein content was noticed after R1 inoculation as compared to other strains and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–672 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No Bradyrhizobium strain influenced the protein content in straw of green gram.

Treatment
different Bradyrhizobium strains inoculatione0
Interactor
BradyrhizobiumBradyrhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
protein content in strawe3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3
Setting
mid-hill conditions of Himachal Pradeshe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Louisa Howard - Dartmouth Electron Microscope Facility · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effect of different Bradyrhizobium strains inoculation on protein and yield attributes of green gram under mid-hill conditions of Himachal Pradesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 84–230 · show in text ↑
e3

“None of the strain could influence the protein content in straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–779 · show in text ↑

Bradyrhizobium · quality: protein · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Bradyrhizobium · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

inoculation · quality: grain · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

inoculation · quality: protein · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

inoculation · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

184 papers: 179 positive, 5 negative or no effect

178 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

180 papers more in this group

See all 184 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.