Paper · 2018 · Journal of Agricultural Science

Inoculation and Soil Texture Effects on Yield and Yield Components of Mungbean

Andre A. Diatta; Wade E. Thomason; Ozzie Abaye; et al.

11
claims
11
verbatim quotes
9
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] is a short-duration and relatively drought-tolerant crop grown predominantly in the tropics. This grain legume can improve soil fertility through biological nitrogen (N) fixation. To assess the effects of Bradyrhizobium (group I) inoculation on yield and yield attributes of mungbean, a greenhouse study was conducted during Fall 2016 with two mungbean cultivars (‘Berken’ and ‘OK2000’), two inoculum treatments (inoculated and uninoculated), and two soil textures (loamy sand and silt loam). Pots were laid out in a completely randomized design and treatment combinations were replicated seven times. The main effects of cultivar and soil texture significantly (P ≤ 0.05) affected mungbean seed weight and plant residue mass. Seed yield (13%), plant residue (22%), and protein content (6%) of OK2000 were significantly higher than Berken cultivar. A 31% seed yield and 40% plant residue increase were recorded on silt loam soil compared to loamy sand soil. Significant increase in plant height (18%) and number of pods per plant (21%) were also recorded when mungbean plants were grown on silt loam compared to loamy sand soil. Bradyrhizobium inoculation significantly increased the number of pods per plant, the number of seeds per plant, and seed yield. [Cultivar × inoculation] and [cultivar × soil texture] interactions had significant (P ≤ 0.05) effects on number of seeds per pods and plant height, respectively. Understanding the agronomic practices and soil physical properties that may limit mungbean production could help in optimizing its establishment and growth in non-traditional growing areas.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

OK2000 seed yield was 13% higher than Berken.

Material
OK2000e0
Outcome
Seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
13%e0
Comparator
Berken cultivare0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Seed yield (13%), plant residue (22%), and protein content (6%) of OK2000 were significantly higher than Berken cultivar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–886 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

OK2000 plant residue was 22% higher than Berken.

Material
OK2000e0
Outcome
plant residuee0
Direction
highere0
Value
22%e0
Comparator
Berken cultivare0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Seed yield (13%), plant residue (22%), and protein content (6%) of OK2000 were significantly higher than Berken cultivar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–886 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

OK2000 protein content was 6% higher than Berken.

Material
OK2000e0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
6%e0
Comparator
Berken cultivare0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Seed yield (13%), plant residue (22%), and protein content (6%) of OK2000 were significantly higher than Berken cultivar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–886 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silt loam increased seed yield by 31% against loamy sand.

Treatment
silt loam soile0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
31%e0
Comparator
loamy sand soile0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“A 31% seed yield and 40% plant residue increase were recorded on silt loam soil compared to loamy sand soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–995 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silt loam increased plant residue by 40% against loamy sand.

Treatment
silt loam soile0
Outcome
plant residuee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
40%e0
Comparator
loamy sand soile0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“A 31% seed yield and 40% plant residue increase were recorded on silt loam soil compared to loamy sand soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–995 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silt loam increased plant height by 18% against loamy sand.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
silt loame0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasee0
Value
18%e0
Comparator
loamy sand soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant increase in plant height (18%) and number of pods per plant (21%) were also recorded when mungbean plants were grown on silt loam compared to loamy sand soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silt loam increased pods per plant by 21% against loamy sand.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
silt loame0
Outcome
number of pods per plante0
Direction
increasee0
Value
21%e0
Comparator
loamy sand soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant increase in plant height (18%) and number of pods per plant (21%) were also recorded when mungbean plants were grown on silt loam compared to loamy sand soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bradyrhizobium inoculation increased pods per plant and seeds per plant.

Treatment
Bradyrhizobium inoculatione0
Interactor
BradyrhizobiumBradyrhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
number of pods per plant, the number of seeds per plante0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Louisa Howard - Dartmouth Electron Microscope Facility · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bradyrhizobium inoculation significantly increased the number of pods per plant, the number of seeds per plant, and seed yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1294 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bradyrhizobium inoculation increased seed yield.

Treatment
Bradyrhizobium inoculatione0
Interactor
BradyrhizobiumBradyrhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Louisa Howard - Dartmouth Electron Microscope Facility · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bradyrhizobium inoculation significantly increased the number of pods per plant, the number of seeds per plant, and seed yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1294 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar and inoculation interacted for seeds per pod.

Treatment
Cultivar × inoculatione0
Outcome
number of seeds per podse0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“[Cultivar × inoculation] and [cultivar × soil texture] interactions had significant (P ≤ 0.05) effects on number of seeds per pods and plant height, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1457 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar and soil texture interacted for plant height.

Treatment
cultivar × soil texturee0
Outcome
plant heighte0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“[Cultivar × inoculation] and [cultivar × soil texture] interactions had significant (P ≤ 0.05) effects on number of seeds per pods and plant height, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1457 · show in text ↑

Bradyrhizobium · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

inoculation · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

184 papers: 179 positive, 5 negative or no effect

178 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

180 papers more in this group

See all 184 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.