Paper · 2010 · Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca

Effects of several Plant Growth Regulators on the Yield and Fiber Quality of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)

Osman ÇOPUR; Ufuk DEMİREL; Mehmet KARAKUŞ

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
26
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Plant growth regulators (PGR) are used in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) production to balance vegetative and reproductive growth, as well as to increase seed cotton yield and lint quality. Field experiments were conducted with some PGRs to determine their effects on yield and yield components of cotton using cv. ‘Stoneville 453’. The study was conducted at Harran University Agricultural Research and Application Center located in Şanlıurfa, Turkey in 2004 and 2005. Seven commercial PGRs (Pix, Bigtonik, Biozyme® TF, K-Humate, Maxicrop and Biogibb) were sprayed at recommended doses and application time during the study. Experiments were arranged as randomized complete plot design with three replications. Experimental plots consisted of 12 meter long with six rows, 0.70 m row spacing and 0.20 m plant-spacing on row. The results showed that the applied PGRs (except pix) had significant positive effects on the seed cotton yield, plant height, average number of open bolls, number of sympodia, boll weight, lint percentage and seed index and decreased the earliness index. However, fiber length, fiber fineness, fiber strength and fiber uniformity were not affected by the treatments. Higher yields were obtained in Maxicrop, Biozyme® TF and Biogibb treated plots. Therefore, PGRs might be considered a component of cotton growth management to provide higher seed cotton yields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied growth regulators other than pix significantly increased seed cotton yield.

Treatment
applied PGRs (except pix)e0
Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Direction
positivee0

Not reportedMaterialComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the applied PGRs (except pix) had significant positive effects on the seed cotton yield, plant height, average number of open bolls, number of sympodia, boll weight, lint percentage and seed index and decreased the earliness index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–1080 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied growth regulators other than pix significantly increased plant height, open boll number and sympodia number.

Treatment
applied PGRs (except pix)e0
Outcome
plant height, average number of open bolls, number of sympodiae0
Direction
positivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the applied PGRs (except pix) had significant positive effects on the seed cotton yield, plant height, average number of open bolls, number of sympodia, boll weight, lint percentage and seed index and decreased the earliness index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–1080 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied growth regulators other than pix significantly increased boll weight, lint percentage and seed index.

Treatment
applied PGRs (except pix)e0
Outcome
boll weight, lint percentage and seed indexe0
Direction
positivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the applied PGRs (except pix) had significant positive effects on the seed cotton yield, plant height, average number of open bolls, number of sympodia, boll weight, lint percentage and seed index and decreased the earliness index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–1080 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied growth regulators other than pix decreased the earliness index.

Treatment
applied PGRs (except pix)e0
Outcome
earliness indexe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the applied PGRs (except pix) had significant positive effects on the seed cotton yield, plant height, average number of open bolls, number of sympodia, boll weight, lint percentage and seed index and decreased the earliness index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–1080 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatments did not affect fiber length, fineness or strength.

Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
fiber length, fiber fineness, fiber strengthe0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, fiber length, fiber fineness, fiber strength and fiber uniformity were not affected by the treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1192 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatments did not affect fiber uniformity.

Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
fiber uniformitye0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, fiber length, fiber fineness, fiber strength and fiber uniformity were not affected by the treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1192 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maxicrop treated plots had higher yields.

Treatment
Maxicrope0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
Highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher yields were obtained in Maxicrop, Biozyme® TF and Biogibb treated plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1272 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biozyme TF treated plots had higher yields.

Treatment
Biozyme® TFe0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
Highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher yields were obtained in Maxicrop, Biozyme® TF and Biogibb treated plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1272 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biogibb treated plots had higher yields.

Treatment
Biogibbe0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
Highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher yields were obtained in Maxicrop, Biozyme® TF and Biogibb treated plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1272 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–107 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest including growth regulators in cotton management for higher seed cotton yields.

Outcome
PGRs might be considered a component of cotton growth managemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Therefore, PGRs might be considered a component of cotton growth management to provide higher seed cotton yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1386 · show in text ↑

class · phenology · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

class · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 6 positive, 5 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

class · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 14 positive, 9 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

class · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 25 positive, 9 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.