Paper · 2012 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Indirect in vitro regeneration of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)

Abdolreza Bagheri; Valiollah Ghasemiomran; S Hatefi

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Establishment of an efficient and reproducible regeneration protocol is one of the basic prerequisites for genetic transformation of any crop plant. In vitro culture of lentil has proven to be difficult. In spite of a number of reports on the regeneration of this plant, very few satisfying and reproducible protocol has yet been reported. This study carried out for investigation of different hormone treatments and explants in order to establish a reproducible protocol for indirect in vitro regeneration of the cultivar Gachsaran (commonly grown in Iran). For this purpose, the effects of 13 different hormone treatments and 4 explants on callus induction and regeneration were studied. Callus with the highest fresh and dry weight was produced on modified Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium containing 1 mg/L α-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA)and 1 mg/L Zeatin (medium E). Among the explants, decapitated embryos attached to 1/4 of the cotyledon (DEAC) produced callus with the highest fresh and dry weights. In the regeneration stage, calli induced on media supplemented with 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) alone or in combination with other hormones did not result in shooting or rooting responses. The highest shooting and rooting responses (75%) were observed for callus induction medium E, using decapitated embryos with a quarter of the cotyledon as the explant.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium E produced callus with the highest fresh and dry weight.

Taxon
lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)Lens culinarist0
Organ / stage
Calluse0
Treatment
modified Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium containing 1 mg/L α-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA)and 1 mg/L Zeatin (medium E)e0
Outcome
fresh and dry weighte0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Callus with the highest fresh and dry weight was produced on modified Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium containing 1 mg/L α-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA)and 1 mg/L Zeatin (medium E)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–868 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Decapitated embryos attached to one quarter of a cotyledon produced the greatest callus fresh and dry weights.

Taxon
lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)Lens culinarist0
Organ / stage
decapitated embryos attached to 1/4 of the cotyledon (DEAC)e0
Outcome
callus with the highest fresh and dry weightse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedMaterial

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decapitated embryos attached to 1/4 of the cotyledon (DEAC) produced callus with the highest fresh and dry weights”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–1004 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calli induced with 2,4-D alone or with other hormones produced neither shoots nor roots.

Taxon
lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)Lens culinarist0
Treatment
media supplemented with 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) alone or in combination with other hormonese0
Outcome
shooting or rooting responsese0
Direction
did not resulte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“calli induced on media supplemented with 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) alone or in combination with other hormones did not result in shooting or rooting responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1204 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium E with decapitated embryos and a quarter cotyledon yielded the highest shooting and rooting responses, at 75%.

Taxon
lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)Lens culinarist0
Organ / stage
decapitated embryos with a quarter of the cotyledone0
Treatment
callus induction medium Ee0
Outcome
shooting and rooting responsese0
Direction
higheste0
Value
75%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest shooting and rooting responses (75%) were observed for callus induction medium E, using decapitated embryos with a quarter of the cotyledon as the explant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1372 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–64 · show in text ↑

2,4-D · growth · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · growth · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

class · growth · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

in vitro · growth · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.