Paper · 2009 · Repositorio - Universidad de Ciencias Aplicadas y Ambientales UDCA.

Growth of maize seedlings (Zea mays L. var. Porva) in nutrient solution with low (Ca+Mg+K)/Al ratio.

Fánor Casierra–Posada; Julián F. Cárdenas-Hernández

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Aluminium injury or toxicity is frequently related to field crops grown in acid soils with high Al3+ availability. Often, pH values below 5.0 have a toxic effect on the growth of agriculturally important plant species, because of the Al3+ solubility. An experiment was carried out in Tunja/Colombia to determine the toxic effect of aluminium on the growth of maize seedlings (Zea mays L. var. Porva). Seedlings were grown in aerated nutrient solution (macro and micronutrients) containing 1, 0.75 or 0.5 (Ca+Mg+K)/Al ratios by addition of Al2(SO4)3.18H2O in relation to the bases (Ca, Mg and K) content in the solution. To the growth solution of the control plantlets no Al was added. The pH was adjusted to 5.5 in all treatments. Seedlings were harvested when the Al-toxicity symptoms were evident. The total root length, the dry matter production and the leaf area were measured; additionally, the root/shoot ratio was calculated. The leaf area, the total dry matter production and the total root length showed no statistical differences between treatments with 1 to 0.5 (Ca+Mg+K)/Al ratios, but all treatments containing Al were statistically different to the control. The value of the root/shoot ratio showed an inversely proportional tendency to the (Ca+Mg+K)/Al ratio. These results suggest that the maize variety Porva is very Al-sensitive, independently of a low or in balance bases/Al ratio.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area, dry matter and root length did not differ statistically among the aluminum ratio treatments.

Taxon
Zea mays L. var. PorvaZea mayst0
Treatment
1 to 0.5 (Ca+Mg+K)/Al ratiose0
Outcome
leaf area, the total dry matter production and the total root lengthe0
Direction
no statistical differencese0
Comparator
treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The leaf area, the total dry matter production and the total root length showed no statistical differences between treatments with 1 to 0.5 (Ca+Mg+K)/Al ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1092 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zea mays L. var. Porva”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All aluminum treatments differed statistically from the control for leaf area, dry matter and root length.

Taxon
Zea mays L. var. PorvaZea mayst0
Treatment
treatments containing Ale0
Outcome
leaf area, the total dry matter production and the total root lengthe0
Comparator
the controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The leaf area, the total dry matter production and the total root length showed no statistical differences between treatments with 1 to 0.5 (Ca+Mg+K)/Al ratios, but all treatments containing Al were statistically different to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1170 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zea mays L. var. Porva”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–49 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The root to shoot ratio tended to vary inversely with the base to aluminum ratio.

Taxon
Zea mays L. var. PorvaZea mayst0
Treatment
(Ca+Mg+K)/Al ratioe0
Outcome
root/shoot ratioe0
Direction
inversely proportionale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The value of the root/shoot ratio showed an inversely proportional tendency to the (Ca+Mg+K)/Al ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1273 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zea mays L. var. Porva”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–49 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors interpret Porva maize as highly aluminum sensitive regardless of the base to aluminum ratio.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Material
Porvae0
Outcome
Al-sensitivee0
Qualifier
independently of a low or in balance bases/Al ratioe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These results suggest that the maize variety Porva is very Al-sensitive, independently of a low or in balance bases/Al ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1399 · show in text ↑

aluminium atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

10 papers: 2 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

calcium atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

19 papers: 14 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

magnesium atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

47 papers: 36 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.