Abstract
Ten insecticides, viz. chlorpyriphos. endosulfan, fenirothion, fenvalerate, isofenphos, methatnidophos, methyl-demeton, phenthoate, phoxim and phosalone were tested against apple blossom thrips at their normal recommended dosages. Their effect on pollen viability and fruit set was also observed. Fentirothion (0.05 per cent) followed by isofenphos (0.1 per cent), methamidophos (0.05 per cent) and fenvalerate (0.01 per cent) were found to be effective insecticides against thrips, without any long lasting effect on pollen viability Per cent fruit set on insecticides-treated trees varied from 9.8 to 14.6 as against 7.2 on untreated (water-sprayed) trees. Tn view of safety to pollinators, isofenphos can be the best choice for the control of apple blossom thrips.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Fenitrothion (0.05 per cent) was effective against thrips.
- Taxon
- Apple
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- Fentirothion (0.05 per cent)e1
- Outcome
- thripse1
- Direction
- effectivee1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
t0“Insecticides for the Control of Apple Blossom Thrips”
e1“Fentirothion (0.05 per cent) followed by isofenphos (0.1 per cent), methamidophos (0.05 per cent) and fenvalerate (0.01 per cent) were found to be effective insecticides against thrips, without any long lasting effect on pollen viability”
Claim · model-written summary
Isofenphos (0.1 per cent) was effective against thrips.
- Taxon
- Apple
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- isofenphos (0.1 per cent)e1
- Outcome
- thripse1
- Direction
- effectivee1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
t0“Insecticides for the Control of Apple Blossom Thrips”
e1“Fentirothion (0.05 per cent) followed by isofenphos (0.1 per cent), methamidophos (0.05 per cent) and fenvalerate (0.01 per cent) were found to be effective insecticides against thrips, without any long lasting effect on pollen viability”
Claim · model-written summary
Methamidophos (0.05 per cent) was effective against thrips.
- Taxon
- Apple
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- methamidophos (0.05 per cent)e1
- Outcome
- thripse1
- Direction
- effectivee1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
t0“Insecticides for the Control of Apple Blossom Thrips”
e1“Fentirothion (0.05 per cent) followed by isofenphos (0.1 per cent), methamidophos (0.05 per cent) and fenvalerate (0.01 per cent) were found to be effective insecticides against thrips, without any long lasting effect on pollen viability”
Claim · model-written summary
Fenvalerate (0.01 per cent) was effective against thrips.
- Taxon
- Apple
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- fenvalerate (0.01 per cent)e1
- Outcome
- thripse1
- Direction
- effectivee1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
t0“Insecticides for the Control of Apple Blossom Thrips”
e1“Fentirothion (0.05 per cent) followed by isofenphos (0.1 per cent), methamidophos (0.05 per cent) and fenvalerate (0.01 per cent) were found to be effective insecticides against thrips, without any long lasting effect on pollen viability”
Claim · model-written summary
The insecticides had no long lasting effect on apple pollen viability.
- Taxon
- Apple
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- insecticidese1
- Outcome
- pollen viabilitye1
- Direction
- without any long lasting effecte1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Insecticides for the Control of Apple Blossom Thrips”
e1“Fentirothion (0.05 per cent) followed by isofenphos (0.1 per cent), methamidophos (0.05 per cent) and fenvalerate (0.01 per cent) were found to be effective insecticides against thrips, without any long lasting effect on pollen viability”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit set on insecticide-treated apple trees varied from 9.8 to 14.6 per cent, against 7.2 per cent on untreated trees.
- Taxon
- Apple
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- insecticides-treated treese2
- Outcome
- fruit sete2
- Direction
- higherinferrede2
- Value
- 9.8 to 14.6e2
- Qualifier
- as against 7.2e2
- Comparator
- untreated (water-sprayed) treese2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Insecticides for the Control of Apple Blossom Thrips”
e2“Per cent fruit set on insecticides-treated trees varied from 9.8 to 14.6 as against 7.2 on untreated (water-sprayed) trees”
Claim · model-written summary
Isofenphos is the best choice for controlling apple blossom thrips in view of pollinator safety.
- Taxon
- Apple
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- isofenphose3
- Outcome
- the control of apple blossom thripse3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Insecticides for the Control of Apple Blossom Thrips”
e3“Tn view of safety to pollinators, isofenphos can be the best choice for the control of apple blossom thrips”
The same questions in other papers
insecticide · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.