Abstract
A field experiment was conducted at Students' Instructional Farm, Barajaguli, B.C.K.V., Nadia, West Bengal, to evaluate the performance of summer groundnut under alluvial soil with different types of inoculation and different levels of cobalt. The results indicate that soil application of cobalt at lower dose (0.21 kg Co ha−1) was the best to enhance the yield and nutrient uptake of groundnut. Pod yield was the highest for inoculation with Rhizobium which was about 7.04 and 11.06% higher than that of inoculation with phosphobacterium and control, respectively. Nitrogen uptake increased over control, and was about 14.51 and 6.68% higher with C0.21 and C0.42, respectively. The highest uptake of phosphorus was by Rhizobium inoculation receiving C0.21 level of cobalt. The average potassium uptake was bout 19.25 and 8.45% higher than control (no cobalt), with C0.21 and C0.42, respectively. Likewise, inoculation with Rhizobium and Phosphobacterium had about 47.90 and 28.76% higher K uptake as compared to no inoculation. The results indicated that soil application of cobalt at lower dose (0.21 kg Co ha−1) was the best to enhance the nutrient uptake of groundnut. The combination of Rhizobium and cobalt @ 0.21 kg ha−1 was found to be the best.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium inoculation gave pod yield 7.04% higher than phosphobacterium inoculation.
- Taxon
- groundnut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- inoculation with Rhizobiume1
- Outcome
- Pod yielde1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 7.04e1
- Comparator
- inoculation with phosphobacteriume1
RhizobiumOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“summer groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”
e1“Pod yield was the highest for inoculation with Rhizobium which was about 7.04 and 11.06% higher than that of inoculation with phosphobacterium and control, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium inoculation gave pod yield 11.06% higher than the control.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- inoculation with Rhizobiume1
- Outcome
- Pod yielde1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 11.06%e1
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“summer groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”
e1“Pod yield was the highest for inoculation with Rhizobium which was about 7.04 and 11.06% higher than that of inoculation with phosphobacterium and control, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Cobalt at C0.21 increased groundnut nitrogen uptake by 14.51% over control.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- C0.21e2
- Outcome
- Nitrogen uptakee2
- Direction
- increasede2
- Value
- 14.51e2
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“summer groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”
e2“Nitrogen uptake increased over control, and was about 14.51 and 6.68% higher with C0.21 and C0.42, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Cobalt at C0.42 increased groundnut nitrogen uptake by 6.68% over control.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- C0.42e2
- Outcome
- Nitrogen uptakee2
- Direction
- increasede2
- Value
- 6.68e2
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“summer groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”
e2“Nitrogen uptake increased over control, and was about 14.51 and 6.68% higher with C0.21 and C0.42, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium inoculation with C0.21 level of cobalt gave the highest groundnut phosphorus uptake.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Rhizobium inoculation receiving C0.21 level of cobalte3
- Outcome
- uptake of phosphoruse3
- Direction
- higheste3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“summer groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”
e3“The highest uptake of phosphorus was by Rhizobium inoculation receiving C0.21 level of cobalt”
Claim · model-written summary
Cobalt at C0.21 increased groundnut potassium uptake by 19.25% over control without cobalt.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- C0.21e4
- Outcome
- average potassium uptakee4
- Direction
- highere4
- Value
- 19.25e4
- Comparator
- control (no cobalt)e4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“summer groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”
e4“The average potassium uptake was bout 19.25 and 8.45% higher than control (no cobalt), with C0.21 and C0.42, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Cobalt at C0.42 increased groundnut potassium uptake by 8.45% over control without cobalt.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- C0.42e4
- Outcome
- average potassium uptakee4
- Direction
- highere4
- Value
- 8.45e4
- Comparator
- control (no cobalt)e4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“summer groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”
e4“The average potassium uptake was bout 19.25 and 8.45% higher than control (no cobalt), with C0.21 and C0.42, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium inoculation increased groundnut potassium uptake by 47.90% compared with no inoculation.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- inoculation with Rhizobiume5
- Outcome
- K uptakee5
- Direction
- highere5
- Value
- 47.90e5
- Comparator
- no inoculatione5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“summer groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”
e5“Likewise, inoculation with Rhizobium and Phosphobacterium had about 47.90 and 28.76% higher K uptake as compared to no inoculation”
Claim · model-written summary
Phosphobacterium inoculation increased groundnut potassium uptake by 28.76% compared with no inoculation.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Phosphobacteriume5
- Interactor
- Phosphobacteriume5symbiont
- Outcome
- K uptakee5
- Direction
- highere5
- Value
- 28.76e5
- Comparator
- no inoculatione5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“summer groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”
e5“Likewise, inoculation with Rhizobium and Phosphobacterium had about 47.90 and 28.76% higher K uptake as compared to no inoculation”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil application of cobalt at 0.21 kg Co ha-1 (lower dose) was the best rate to enhance groundnut yield and nutrient uptake.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- soil application of cobalt at lower dose (0.21 kg Co ha−1)e6
- Outcome
- the best to enhance the yield and nutrient uptake of groundnute6
- Direction
- the beste6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“summer groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”
e6“soil application of cobalt at lower dose (0.21 kg Co ha−1) was the best to enhance the yield and nutrient uptake of groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
The combination of Rhizobium and cobalt at 0.21 kg ha-1 was found to be the best treatment.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- The combination of Rhizobium and cobalt @ 0.21 kg ha−1e7
- Outcome
- found to be the beste7
- Direction
- the beste7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“summer groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”
e7“The combination of Rhizobium and cobalt @ 0.21 kg ha−1 was found to be the best”
The same questions in other papers
cobalt atom · nutrient: content · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →cobalt atom · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →Rhizobium · nutrient: content · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →Rhizobium · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
54 papers more in this group
See all 58 papers →inoculation · nutrient: content · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
52 papers more in this group
See all 56 papers →inoculation · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
197 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
217 papers more in this group
See all 221 papers →application · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
214 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
218 papers more in this group
See all 222 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.