Paper · 1996 · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY

Evidence for the Contribution of the Mehler-Peroxidase Reaction in Dissipating Excess Electrons in Drought-Stressed Wheat

K. Biehler; H. Fock

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
278
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Gross O2 evolution and uptake by attached, drought-stressed leaves of wheat (Triticum aestivum) were measured using a 16O2/ 18O2 isotope technique and mass spectrometry. The activity of photosystem II, determined from the rate of 16O2 evolution, is only slightly affected under drought conditions. During drought stress, net CO2 uptake decreases due to stomatal closure, whereas the uptake of 18O2 is stimulated. The main O2-consuming reactions in the light are the Mehler-peroxidase (MP) reaction and the photorespiratory pathway. From measurements of the rate of carbon flux through the photorespiratory pathway, estimated by the analysis of the specific radioactivities of glycolate, we conclude that the rate of photorespiration is decreased with drought stress. Therefore, the O2 taken up in the light appears to be preferentially used by the MP reaction. In stressed leaves, 29.1% of the photosynthetic electrons are consumed in the MP reaction and 18.4% drive the photorespiratory pathway. Thus, overreduction of the electron transport chain is avoided preferably by the MP reaction when drought stress restricts CO2 reduction.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought only slightly affected photosystem II activity.

Treatment
drought conditionse0
Outcome
activity of photosystem IIe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The activity of photosystem II, determined from the rate of 16O2 evolution, is only slightly affected under drought conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–297 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net CO2 uptake decreased during drought because of stomatal closure.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
net CO2 uptakee0
Direction
decreasese0
Qualifier
stomatal closuree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During drought stress, net CO2 uptake decreases due to stomatal closure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–369 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

18O2 uptake was stimulated during drought.

Treatment
drought stresse1
Outcome
uptake of 18O2e0
Direction
stimulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“whereas the uptake of 18O2 is stimulated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 371–411 · show in text ↑
e1

“During drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–319 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The photorespiration rate decreased with drought stress.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
rate of photorespiratione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the rate of photorespiration is decreased with drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–765 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–121 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oxygen consumed in the light appeared to be used preferentially by the MP reaction.

Outcome
O2 taken up in the lighte0
Qualifier
preferentially used by the MP reactione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the O2 taken up in the light appears to be preferentially used by the MP reaction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–859 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–121 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In stressed leaves, 29.1% of photosynthetic electrons were consumed in the MP reaction.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
photosynthetic electrons are consumed in the MP reactione0
Value
29.1%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In stressed leaves, 29.1% of the photosynthetic electrons are consumed in the MP reaction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–950 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–121 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In stressed leaves, 18.4% of photosynthetic electrons drove photorespiration.

Organ / stage
leavese1
Outcome
photorespiratory pathwaye0
Value
18.4%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“18.4% drive the photorespiratory pathway”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–995 · show in text ↑
e1

“In stressed leaves, 29.1% of the photosynthetic electrons are consumed in the MP reaction and 18.4% drive the photorespiratory pathway”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–995 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–121 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The MP reaction preferentially prevented electron transport chain overreduction when drought restricted CO2 reduction.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
overreduction of the electron transport chain is avoidede0
Qualifier
MP reactione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“overreduction of the electron transport chain is avoided preferably by the MP reaction when drought stress restricts CO2 reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1133 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–121 · show in text ↑

drought · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

60 papers: 12 positive, 48 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.