Paper · 2014 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Instrumental and sensory analyses of quality attributes of grafted specialty melons

Wenjing Guan; Xin Zhao; Donald J Huber; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
18
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Soilborne disease management remains a great challenge in melon production with the phaseout of soil fumigant methyl bromide. Grafting has been shown to be an effective approach to control soilborne diseases. However, previous research has yielded mixed results regarding the impacts of rootstock on fruit quality. Very few studies have assessed melon quality attributes using both sensory evaluation and instrumental methods. RESULTS: Galia melon 'Arava' (Cucumis melo L. var. reticulatus Ser.) and honeydew melon 'Honey Yellow' (C. melo L. var. inodorus Naud.) were grafted onto commercial hybrid squash (Cucurbita maxima Duchesne × Cucurbita moschata Duchesne) rootstocks and root-knot nematode-resistant Cucumis metulifer E. Mey. ex Naud. rootstock. The grafting combinations were evaluated under different production conditions. Grafting with hybrid squash rootstocks resulted in reduced soluble solids content (SSC) and decreased sensory ratings of 'Arava' fruit. By contrast with grafted 'Arava', grafted 'Honey Yellow' did not exhibit significant differences in sensory properties and instrumental measurements regardless of production conditions and rootstock selection. CONCLUSION: The effects of grafting on fruit quality attributes differed between the two distinctive types of melon scion used. Potential negative impacts of rootstocks on melon fruit quality need to be considered in the selection and use of disease-resistant rootstocks.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrid squash rootstocks reduced soluble solids content in Arava fruit.

Taxon
melonCucumis meloe1
Material
'Arava'e0
Treatment
Grafting with hybrid squash rootstockse0
Outcome
soluble solids content (SSC)e0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grafting with hybrid squash rootstocks resulted in reduced soluble solids content (SSC) and decreased sensory ratings of 'Arava' fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–981 · show in text ↑
e1

“Galia melon 'Arava' (Cucumis melo L. var. reticulatus Ser.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–507 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrid squash rootstocks decreased sensory ratings of Arava fruit.

Taxon
melonCucumis meloe1
Material
'Arava'e0
Treatment
Grafting with hybrid squash rootstockse0
Outcome
sensory ratingse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grafting with hybrid squash rootstocks resulted in reduced soluble solids content (SSC) and decreased sensory ratings of 'Arava' fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–981 · show in text ↑
e1

“Galia melon 'Arava' (Cucumis melo L. var. reticulatus Ser.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–507 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted Honey Yellow showed no significant sensory-property differences across production conditions and rootstocks.

Taxon
melonCucumis meloe1
Material
'Honey Yellow'e0
Treatment
grafted 'Honey Yellow'e0
Outcome
sensory propertiese0
Direction
did not exhibit significant differencese0
Qualifier
regardless of production conditions and rootstock selectione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grafted 'Honey Yellow' did not exhibit significant differences in sensory properties and instrumental measurements regardless of production conditions and rootstock selection.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1191 · show in text ↑
e1

“honeydew melon 'Honey Yellow' (C. melo L. var. inodorus Naud.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–574 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted Honey Yellow showed no significant differences in instrumental measurements across conditions and rootstocks.

Taxon
melonCucumis meloe1
Material
'Honey Yellow'e0
Treatment
grafted 'Honey Yellow'e0
Outcome
instrumental measurementse0
Direction
did not exhibit significant differencese0
Qualifier
regardless of production conditions and rootstock selectione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grafted 'Honey Yellow' did not exhibit significant differences in sensory properties and instrumental measurements regardless of production conditions and rootstock selection.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1191 · show in text ↑
e1

“honeydew melon 'Honey Yellow' (C. melo L. var. inodorus Naud.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–574 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors advise considering possible negative rootstock effects on melon fruit quality when choosing resistant rootstocks.

Taxon
melonCucumis meloe0
Outcome
selection and use of disease-resistant rootstockse0
Qualifier
Potential negative impacts of rootstocks on melon fruit qualitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Potential negative impacts of rootstocks on melon fruit quality need to be considered in the selection and use of disease-resistant rootstocks.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1463 · show in text ↑

grafting · molecular: metabolites · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results differ

19 papers: 9 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

grafting · quality: general · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 2 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.