Paper · 2004 · Xibei Nong-Lin Keji Daxue xuebao. Ziran kexue ban

Effect of grafting and seedling on "Jiashi" muskmelon yield and its resistance to Melon fusarium Wilt

XU Sheng-li; Xiaoqing Chen

10
claims
25
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Jiashi Muskmelon (var.saccharinus Naud) was grafted on blackseed pumpkin (Cucurbita ficifolia) to control melon fusarium wilt.The effect of grafting and seedling on resistance to melon fusarium wilt and on yield and quality were studied. The result demonstrated that there was high affinity between rootstock and scion by different grafting and seedling.The survival rate of grafting was above (77.7%) by soilless seedling, significantly higher than those of soil seedling (68.1%). The root of all grafted seedling were more flourishing than those of no-grafted seedling,All index of grafted seedling were higher than those of non-grafted,especially the chlorophyll content,Pn and Shoot-DW of grafted seedling were significantly higher than that of non-grafted seedling.It also indicated that the grafted plants were better not only in root system, diameter of stem,leaf area,specific leaf weight (SLW),index of high quality seedling (IHQS),and single fruit weight,yield and quality, but also in their resistance to fusarium wilt.The controlling effectiveness was above 95.4% in field. The seedlings grown in substance were better for grafting as compared with those grown in soil,even better than no-grafting.Yield increase of grafted melon was mainly in late stage and increased by 75.9%-112.3%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The survival rate of grafting was above 77.7% with soilless seedlings, significantly higher than with soil seedlings at 68.1%.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
soilless seedlinge0
Outcome
survival rate of graftinge0
Direction
highere0
Value
77.7%e0
Comparator
soil seedlinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“The survival rate of grafting was above (77.7%) by soilless seedling, significantly higher than those of soil seedling (68.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–480 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Roots of grafted seedlings were more flourishing than those of non-grafted seedlings.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
grafted seedlinge0
Outcome
roote0
Direction
more flourishinge0
Comparator
no-grafted seedlinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“The root of all grafted seedling were more flourishing than those of no-grafted seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–570 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll content, Pn and shoot dry weight of grafted seedlings were significantly higher than those of non-grafted seedlings.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
grafted seedlinge0
Outcome
chlorophyll content,Pn and Shoot-DWe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
non-grafted seedlinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“especially the chlorophyll content,Pn and Shoot-DW of grafted seedling were significantly higher than that of non-grafted seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–769 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted plants were better in root system, stem diameter and leaf area.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
grafted plantse0
Outcome
root system, diameter of stem,leaf areae0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“the grafted plants were better not only in root system, diameter of stem,leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–875 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted plants had better specific leaf weight and index of high quality seedling.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
grafted plantse0
Outcome
specific leaf weight (SLW),index of high quality seedling (IHQS)e1
Direction
higherinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“the grafted plants were better not only in”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–835 · show in text ↑
e1

“specific leaf weight (SLW),index of high quality seedling (IHQS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–940 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted plants were better in single fruit weight, yield and quality.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
grafted plantse0
Outcome
single fruit weight,yield and qualitye1
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“the grafted plants were better not only in”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–835 · show in text ↑
e1

“single fruit weight,yield and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–982 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted plants were better in resistance to fusarium wilt.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
grafted plantse1
Interactor
fusariumFusariume0pathogen
Outcome
resistance to fusarium wilte0
Direction
higherinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–53 · show in text ↑
t1

“grafting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–18 · show in text ↑
e0

“but also in their resistance to fusarium wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1029 · show in text ↑
e1

“the grafted plants were better not only in”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–835 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting gave a controlling effectiveness against melon fusarium wilt above 95.4% in the field.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
graftingt1
Outcome
controlling effectivenesse0
Direction
abovee0
Value
above 95.4%e0
Setting
in fielde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–53 · show in text ↑
t1

“grafting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–18 · show in text ↑
e0

“The controlling effectiveness was above 95.4% in field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1084 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield of grafted melon increased by 75.9%-112.3%, mainly in the late stage.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
grafted melone0
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
75.9%-112.3%e0
Qualifier
mainly in late stagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“Yield increase of grafted melon was mainly in late stage and increased by 75.9%-112.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1296 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

There was high affinity between rootstock and scion under the different grafting and seedling methods.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Outcome
affinity between rootstock and scione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“there was high affinity between rootstock and scion by different grafting and seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–353 · show in text ↑

grafting · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results differ

34 papers: 30 positive, 4 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

grafting · quality: general · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 2 positive, 5 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

grafting · physiology: photosynthesis · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

grafting · growth · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 34 positive, 5 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

grafting · Fusarium · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.