Paper · 2007 · Hubei nongye kexue

Effects of Grafting on Photosynthesis Characteristic,Hormone Content in Xylem Exudation and Yield of Melon

Tang Zhong-yan

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Pumpkin Shengzhen 1 was used as rootstock for melon Yumeiren in this experiment,and the own-root plant was used as control.The effect of grafting on photosynthesis characteristics,yield and sugar content in melon were studied.The results showed that grafting had positive effect on expanding leaf area,increasing branch growth and promoting dry weight accumulation in various organs during melon development.However,the effect of grafting on chlorophyll content in leaves was small.The effects of grafting on the net photosynthetic rate of functional leaf,transpiration rate,stomatal conductance and intercellular CO2 concentration were also small in each developing stage.Therefore,the photosynthetic rate of grafting plant increased mainly due to expanding total leaf area of melon plant.ZT,GAs and ABA concentrations in xylem sap were lower than that in own-root plant.However,ZT and GAs contents were higher than that of the control but ABA decreased.In addition,the effect of grafting on yield was positive.Average weight of single fruit and yield per hm2 of grafted melon were higher than that of the own-root melons.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting increased melon leaf area, branch growth and dry-weight accumulation.

Taxon
melonCucumis meloe0
Treatment
graftinge0
Outcome
leaf area,increasing branch growth and promoting dry weight accumulatione0
Direction
expandinge0
Comparator
own-root plantt1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grafting had positive effect on expanding leaf area,increasing branch growth and promoting dry weight accumulation in various organs during melon development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–408 · show in text ↑
t0

“Melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–106 · show in text ↑
t1

“the own-root plant was used as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 84–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting had little effect on leaf chlorophyll content.

Taxon
MelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
graftinge0
Outcome
chlorophyll content in leavese0
Direction
smalle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effect of grafting on chlorophyll content in leaves was small.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–482 · show in text ↑
t0

“Melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting had little effect on leaf gas-exchange traits.

Taxon
MelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
graftinge0
Outcome
net photosynthetic rate of functional leaf,transpiration rate,stomatal conductance and intercellular CO2 concentratione0
Direction
smalle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of grafting on the net photosynthetic rate of functional leaf,transpiration rate,stomatal conductance and intercellular CO2 concentration were also small in each developing stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–673 · show in text ↑
t0

“Melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–106 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attributed higher whole-plant photosynthesis mainly to expanded total leaf area.

Taxon
melonCucumis meloe0
Organ / stage
total leaf areae0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the photosynthetic rate of grafting plant increased mainly due to expanding total leaf area of melon plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–790 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZT, GAs and ABA concentrations in xylem sap were lower in grafted plants.

Taxon
MelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
graftingt1
Outcome
ZT,GAs and ABA concentrations in xylem sape0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
own-root plante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ZT,GAs and ABA concentrations in xylem sap were lower than that in own-root plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–872 · show in text ↑
t0

“Melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–106 · show in text ↑
t1

“Grafting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZT and GAs contents were higher in grafted plants than controls.

Taxon
MelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
Graftingt1
Outcome
ZT and GAs contentse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ZT and GAs contents were higher than that of the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–936 · show in text ↑
t0

“Melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–106 · show in text ↑
t1

“Grafting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ABA content decreased in grafted plants.

Taxon
MelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
Graftingt1
Outcome
ABAe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ABA decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–955 · show in text ↑
t0

“Melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–106 · show in text ↑
t1

“Grafting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted melon had higher mean single-fruit weight.

Taxon
melonCucumis meloe0
Treatment
grafted melone0
Outcome
Average weight of single fruite0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
own-root melonse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Average weight of single fruit and yield per hm2 of grafted melon were higher than that of the own-root melons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted melon had higher yield per hectare.

Taxon
melonCucumis meloe0
Treatment
grafted melone0
Outcome
yield per hm2e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
own-root melonse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Average weight of single fruit and yield per hm2 of grafted melon were higher than that of the own-root melons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1123 · show in text ↑

grafting · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results differ

34 papers: 30 positive, 4 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

grafting · physiology: pigments · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

grafting · physiology: photosynthesis · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

grafting · growth · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 34 positive, 5 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.