Paper · 2013 · Remediation Journal

Potential of Rhizobacteria for Improving Lead Phytoextraction in Ricinus communis

T. A. Siva Ananthi; P. N. Arul Manikandan

3
claims
5
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Heavy metal–resistant bacterial strains were isolated from heavy metal–contaminated soils and identified as Bacillus sp. and Leclercia adecarboxylata on the basis of their morphology and biochemical characters using the VITEK 2 Systems Version 05.02. The heavy metal and antibiotic resistance of the isolates were studied. A green house pot experiment was conducted to examine the bacterial ability to extract the lead in soils and for their effect on lead uptake by Ricinus communis in an artificially contaminated soil. Bacterial inoculated pots increased the biomass of the R. communis compared to the uninoculated control, and the root growth of the plant was also increased in the inoculated pot. The experimental data confirmed that lead‐resistant bacteria have a pronounced effect on heavy metal uptake in plants, which may provide a new bacterially assisted phytoremediation of metal‐contaminated soils. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated Ricinus communis had greater biomass than uninoculated controls.

Taxon
R. communisRicinus communise0
Treatment
Bacterial inoculated potse0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
uninoculated controle0

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ricinus communis
Ricinus communis · TaxonDvellakat · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacterial inoculated pots increased the biomass of the R. communis compared to the uninoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–625 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated Ricinus communis had increased root growth.

Taxon
Ricinus communisRicinus communist0
Organ / stage
roote0
Treatment
inoculated pote0
Outcome
root growthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ricinus communis
Ricinus communis · TaxonDvellakat · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the root growth of the plant was also increased in the inoculated pot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–700 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ricinus communis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lead-resistant bacteria affected heavy metal uptake in Ricinus communis.

Taxon
Ricinus communisRicinus communist0
Treatment
lead‐resistant bacteriae0
Interactor
lead‐resistant bacteriae0other
Outcome
heavy metal uptakee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ricinus communis
Ricinus communis · TaxonDvellakat · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lead‐resistant bacteria have a pronounced effect on heavy metal uptake in plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–819 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ricinus communis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–81 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Ricinus communis (castor bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Ricinus communis (castor bean)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.