Paper · 2013 · Madras Agricultural Journal

Response of Sweet Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) to Tillage and Spentwash on Juice Quality and Economics

M. T. Malagi; S. S. Angadi; N. D. Yogendra; et al.

17
claims
31
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at the Main Agricultural Research Station, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad to study the effect of spentwash and tillage on juice quality and economics of sweet sorghum under rainfed condition. Results revealed that deep tillage recorded significantly higher ethanol yield (769.6 l/ha), juice yield (9644.0 l/ha), extractability (269.73 ml/kg), extraction per cent (31.84%), brix0 (18.250) and pol per cent (12.76%) of sweet sorghum as compared to shallow tillage. Among the different spentwash levels, 150 kg N per ha through spentwash recorded significantly higher ethanol yield (750.2 l/ha), juice yield (9567.3 l/ha), extractability (273.95 ml/kg), extraction per cent (32.30%), brix0 (17.990) and pol per cent (12.71%) as compared to 75 kg N per ha through spentwash and control, but was on par with 100 kg N per ha through spentwash recommended dose of fertility and 125 kg N per ha through spentwash. The study indicated that a treatment combination of deep tillage with 100 kg N per ha through spentwash was found to be suitable for juice quality of sweet sorghum over other treatment combinations. Based on economics, this treatment was found to be suitable for higher gross returns (Rs. 35486.9/ha), net returns (Rs. 21644.9/ha) and B: C ratio (2.56) with minimum cost of cultivation (Rs. 13842.0/ha) as compared to other treatment combinations. The enormous quantities of plant nutrients present in spentwash offers an excellent opportunity to use it as a liquid fertilizer along with irrigation water, thus enabling the farmers to save cost incurred on fertilizers and at the same time achieve higher yields of crops

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep tillage raised ethanol yield to 769.6 l/ha versus shallow tillage.

Taxon
sweet sorghume0
Treatment
deep tillagee0
Outcome
ethanol yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
769.6 l/hae0
Comparator
shallow tillagee0

Verbatim

e0

“deep tillage recorded significantly higher ethanol yield (769.6 l/ha), juice yield (9644.0 l/ha), extractability (269.73 ml/kg), extraction per cent (31.84%), brix0 (18.250) and pol per cent (12.76%) of sweet sorghum as compared to shallow tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–508 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep tillage increased juice yield versus shallow tillage.

Taxon
sweet sorghume0
Treatment
deep tillagee0
Outcome
juice yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
9644.0 l/hae0
Comparator
shallow tillagee0

Verbatim

e0

“deep tillage recorded significantly higher ethanol yield (769.6 l/ha), juice yield (9644.0 l/ha), extractability (269.73 ml/kg), extraction per cent (31.84%), brix0 (18.250) and pol per cent (12.76%) of sweet sorghum as compared to shallow tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–508 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep tillage increased extractability versus shallow tillage.

Taxon
sweet sorghume0
Treatment
deep tillagee0
Outcome
extractabilitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
269.73 ml/kge0
Comparator
shallow tillagee0

Verbatim

e0

“deep tillage recorded significantly higher ethanol yield (769.6 l/ha), juice yield (9644.0 l/ha), extractability (269.73 ml/kg), extraction per cent (31.84%), brix0 (18.250) and pol per cent (12.76%) of sweet sorghum as compared to shallow tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–508 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep tillage increased extraction per cent versus shallow tillage.

Taxon
sweet sorghume0
Treatment
deep tillagee0
Outcome
extraction per cente0
Direction
highere0
Value
31.84%e0
Comparator
shallow tillagee0

Verbatim

e0

“deep tillage recorded significantly higher ethanol yield (769.6 l/ha), juice yield (9644.0 l/ha), extractability (269.73 ml/kg), extraction per cent (31.84%), brix0 (18.250) and pol per cent (12.76%) of sweet sorghum as compared to shallow tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–508 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep tillage increased brix0 versus shallow tillage.

Taxon
sweet sorghume0
Treatment
deep tillagee0
Outcome
brix0e0
Direction
highere0
Value
18.250e0
Comparator
shallow tillagee0

Verbatim

e0

“deep tillage recorded significantly higher ethanol yield (769.6 l/ha), juice yield (9644.0 l/ha), extractability (269.73 ml/kg), extraction per cent (31.84%), brix0 (18.250) and pol per cent (12.76%) of sweet sorghum as compared to shallow tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–508 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep tillage increased pol per cent versus shallow tillage.

Taxon
sweet sorghume0
Treatment
deep tillagee0
Outcome
pol per cente0
Direction
highere0
Value
12.76%e0
Comparator
shallow tillagee0

Verbatim

e0

“deep tillage recorded significantly higher ethanol yield (769.6 l/ha), juice yield (9644.0 l/ha), extractability (269.73 ml/kg), extraction per cent (31.84%), brix0 (18.250) and pol per cent (12.76%) of sweet sorghum as compared to shallow tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–508 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spentwash at 150 kg N per ha increased ethanol yield versus lower rates and control.

Taxon
sweet sorghumt0
Treatment
150 kg N per ha through spentwashe0
Outcome
ethanol yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
750.2 l/hae0
Comparator
75 kg N per ha through spentwash and controle0

Verbatim

e0

“150 kg N per ha through spentwash recorded significantly higher ethanol yield (750.2 l/ha), juice yield (9567.3 l/ha), extractability (273.95 ml/kg), extraction per cent (32.30%), brix0 (17.990) and pol per cent (12.71%) as compared to 75 kg N per ha through spentwash and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–828 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spentwash at 150 kg N per ha increased juice yield versus lower rates and control.

Taxon
sweet sorghumt0
Treatment
150 kg N per ha through spentwashe0
Outcome
juice yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
9567.3 l/hae0
Comparator
75 kg N per ha through spentwash and controle0

Verbatim

e0

“150 kg N per ha through spentwash recorded significantly higher ethanol yield (750.2 l/ha), juice yield (9567.3 l/ha), extractability (273.95 ml/kg), extraction per cent (32.30%), brix0 (17.990) and pol per cent (12.71%) as compared to 75 kg N per ha through spentwash and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–828 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spentwash at 150 kg N per ha increased extractability versus lower rates and control.

Taxon
sweet sorghumt0
Treatment
150 kg N per ha through spentwashe0
Outcome
extractabilitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
273.95 ml/kge0
Comparator
75 kg N per ha through spentwash and controle0

Verbatim

e0

“150 kg N per ha through spentwash recorded significantly higher ethanol yield (750.2 l/ha), juice yield (9567.3 l/ha), extractability (273.95 ml/kg), extraction per cent (32.30%), brix0 (17.990) and pol per cent (12.71%) as compared to 75 kg N per ha through spentwash and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–828 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spentwash at 150 kg N per ha increased extraction per cent versus lower rates and control.

Taxon
sweet sorghumt0
Treatment
150 kg N per ha through spentwashe0
Outcome
extraction per cente0
Direction
highere0
Value
32.30%e0
Comparator
75 kg N per ha through spentwash and controle0

Verbatim

e0

“150 kg N per ha through spentwash recorded significantly higher ethanol yield (750.2 l/ha), juice yield (9567.3 l/ha), extractability (273.95 ml/kg), extraction per cent (32.30%), brix0 (17.990) and pol per cent (12.71%) as compared to 75 kg N per ha through spentwash and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–828 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spentwash at 150 kg N per ha increased brix0 versus lower rates and control.

Taxon
sweet sorghumt0
Treatment
150 kg N per ha through spentwashe0
Outcome
brix0e0
Direction
highere0
Value
17.990e0
Comparator
75 kg N per ha through spentwash and controle0

Verbatim

e0

“150 kg N per ha through spentwash recorded significantly higher ethanol yield (750.2 l/ha), juice yield (9567.3 l/ha), extractability (273.95 ml/kg), extraction per cent (32.30%), brix0 (17.990) and pol per cent (12.71%) as compared to 75 kg N per ha through spentwash and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–828 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spentwash at 150 kg N per ha increased pol per cent versus lower rates and control.

Taxon
sweet sorghumt0
Treatment
150 kg N per ha through spentwashe0
Outcome
pol per cente0
Direction
highere0
Value
12.71%e0
Comparator
75 kg N per ha through spentwash and controle0

Verbatim

e0

“150 kg N per ha through spentwash recorded significantly higher ethanol yield (750.2 l/ha), juice yield (9567.3 l/ha), extractability (273.95 ml/kg), extraction per cent (32.30%), brix0 (17.990) and pol per cent (12.71%) as compared to 75 kg N per ha through spentwash and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–828 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–25 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Deep tillage with 100 kg N per ha spentwash was suitable for juice quality.

Taxon
sweet sorghume0
Treatment
deep tillage with 100 kg N per ha through spentwashe0
Outcome
juice qualitye0
Comparator
other treatment combinationse0

Verbatim

e0

“a treatment combination of deep tillage with 100 kg N per ha through spentwash was found to be suitable for juice quality of sweet sorghum over other treatment combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The deep tillage and spentwash combination gave gross returns.

Taxon
sweet sorghumt0
Treatment
deep tillage with 100 kg N per ha through spentwashe2
Outcome
gross returnse0
Direction
highere0
Value
Rs. 35486.9/hae0
Comparator
other treatment combinationse0

Verbatim

e0

“this treatment was found to be suitable for higher gross returns (Rs. 35486.9/ha), net returns (Rs. 21644.9/ha) and B: C ratio (2.56) with minimum cost of cultivation (Rs. 13842.0/ha) as compared to other treatment combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1399 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–25 · show in text ↑
e2

“a treatment combination of deep tillage with 100 kg N per ha through spentwash was found to be suitable for juice quality of sweet sorghum over other treatment combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The deep tillage and spentwash combination gave net returns.

Taxon
sweet sorghumt0
Treatment
deep tillage with 100 kg N per ha through spentwashe2
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
highere0
Value
Rs. 21644.9/hae0
Comparator
other treatment combinationse0

Verbatim

e0

“this treatment was found to be suitable for higher gross returns (Rs. 35486.9/ha), net returns (Rs. 21644.9/ha) and B: C ratio (2.56) with minimum cost of cultivation (Rs. 13842.0/ha) as compared to other treatment combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1399 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–25 · show in text ↑
e2

“a treatment combination of deep tillage with 100 kg N per ha through spentwash was found to be suitable for juice quality of sweet sorghum over other treatment combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The deep tillage and spentwash combination gave B: C ratio.

Taxon
sweet sorghumt0
Treatment
deep tillage with 100 kg N per ha through spentwashe2
Outcome
B: C ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.56e0
Comparator
other treatment combinationse0

Verbatim

e0

“this treatment was found to be suitable for higher gross returns (Rs. 35486.9/ha), net returns (Rs. 21644.9/ha) and B: C ratio (2.56) with minimum cost of cultivation (Rs. 13842.0/ha) as compared to other treatment combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1399 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–25 · show in text ↑
e2

“a treatment combination of deep tillage with 100 kg N per ha through spentwash was found to be suitable for juice quality of sweet sorghum over other treatment combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The deep tillage and spentwash combination gave cost of cultivation.

Taxon
sweet sorghumt0
Treatment
deep tillage with 100 kg N per ha through spentwashe2
Outcome
cost of cultivatione0
Direction
minimume0
Value
Rs. 13842.0/hae0
Comparator
other treatment combinationse0

Verbatim

e0

“this treatment was found to be suitable for higher gross returns (Rs. 35486.9/ha), net returns (Rs. 21644.9/ha) and B: C ratio (2.56) with minimum cost of cultivation (Rs. 13842.0/ha) as compared to other treatment combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1399 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–25 · show in text ↑
e2

“a treatment combination of deep tillage with 100 kg N per ha through spentwash was found to be suitable for juice quality of sweet sorghum over other treatment combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1150 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · SorghumResults differ

123 papers: 102 positive, 21 negative or no effect

101 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

119 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.