Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The deep tillage and spentwash combination gave gross returns.

A claim from Response of Sweet Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) to Tillage and Spentwash on Juice Quality and Economics · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The deep tillage and spentwash combination gave gross returns.

Taxon
sweet sorghumt0
Treatment
deep tillage with 100 kg N per ha through spentwashe2
Outcome
gross returnse0
Direction
highere0
Value
Rs. 35486.9/hae0
Comparator
other treatment combinationse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“this treatment was found to be suitable for higher gross returns (Rs. 35486.9/ha), net returns (Rs. 21644.9/ha) and B: C ratio (2.56) with minimum cost of cultivation (Rs. 13842.0/ha) as compared to other treatment combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1399
t0

“Sweet Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–25
e2

“a treatment combination of deep tillage with 100 kg N per ha through spentwash was found to be suitable for juice quality of sweet sorghum over other treatment combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1150

Title

Response of Sweet Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) to Tillage and Spentwash on Juice Quality and Economics

M. T. Malagi; S. S. Angadi; N. D. Yogendra; et al. Madras Agricultural Journal 2013

Other claims from this paper (16)

Record rev-e14b8cc0f3f4ae58575f7094560f100c85024fc8ea56914965fcdc5e3c9e3a40 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 14 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · SorghumResults differ

123 papers: 102 positive, 21 negative or no effect

101 papers in the same direction as this claim · 17 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

114 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.