Paper · 2013 · The Philippine Agricultural Scientist

Forage Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Alfalfa Applied with Silicon under Water Deficit Conditions

Hui Xia Liu; Zheng Gang Guo

9
claims
21
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

A pot experiment was conducted to investigate the response in terms of forage yield components and water use efficiency (WUE) of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) plants to silicon (Si) application (4 kg K2SiO3 per pot) at varying soil moisture environments [35%, 50%, 65% and 80% of field water capacity (FWC)]. Alfalfa forage biomass and number of branches increased with increase in soil moisture level. Application significantly increased both parameters only at 50% and 65% of FWC. It also increased the instantaneous WUE of alfalfa plants at all soil moisture levels. On the other hand, the increase in cumulative WUE with Si application was significant only at 50% and 60% FWC. Si concentration in the shoot was highest at 65% of FWC, while in the roots, higher concentrations were obtained at 50% and 65% of FWC relative to the other soil moisture levels. Si application reduced both the transpiration rate and stomatal conductance but had no effect on photosynthetic rate. The results revealed that the promotive effect of Si application on biomass and WUE was regulated by the soil moisture conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alfalfa forage biomass and number of branches increased with soil moisture level.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
soil moisture levele1
Outcome
forage biomass and number of branchese1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
pot experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A pot experiment was conducted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–30 · show in text ↑
e1

“Alfalfa forage biomass and number of branches increased with increase in soil moisture level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–400 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon application significantly increased alfalfa forage biomass and number of branches only at 50% and 65% of field water capacity.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
silicon (Si) applicatione3
Outcome
forage biomass and number of branchese1
Direction
increasede2
Qualifier
only at 50% and 65% of FWCe2
Setting
pot experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A pot experiment was conducted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–30 · show in text ↑
e1

“Alfalfa forage biomass and number of branches increased with increase in soil moisture level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–400 · show in text ↑
e2

“Application significantly increased both parameters only at 50% and 65% of FWC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–480 · show in text ↑
e3

“to silicon (Si) application (4 kg K2SiO3 per pot)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–214 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon application increased instantaneous water use efficiency of alfalfa at all soil moisture levels.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae4
Treatment
silicon (Si) applicatione3
Outcome
instantaneous WUEe4
Direction
increasede4
Qualifier
at all soil moisture levelse4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e3

“to silicon (Si) application (4 kg K2SiO3 per pot)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–214 · show in text ↑
e4

“It also increased the instantaneous WUE of alfalfa plants at all soil moisture levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–567 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon application increased cumulative water use efficiency of alfalfa significantly only at 50% and 60% of field water capacity.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae4
Treatment
Si applicatione5
Outcome
cumulative WUEe5
Direction
increasee5
Qualifier
only at 50% and 60% FWCe5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e4

“It also increased the instantaneous WUE of alfalfa plants at all soil moisture levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–567 · show in text ↑
e5

“the increase in cumulative WUE with Si application was significant only at 50% and 60% FWC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–678 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon concentration in the shoot of alfalfa was highest at 65% of field water capacity.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Organ / stage
shoote6
Outcome
Si concentratione6
Direction
higheste6
Qualifier
at 65% of FWCe6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Alfalfa forage biomass and number of branches increased with increase in soil moisture level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–400 · show in text ↑
e6

“Si concentration in the shoot was highest at 65% of FWC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–735 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon concentration in the roots of alfalfa was higher at 50% and 65% of field water capacity than at other soil moisture levels.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Organ / stage
rootse7
Outcome
concentrationse7
Direction
highere7
Comparator
the other soil moisture levelse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Alfalfa forage biomass and number of branches increased with increase in soil moisture level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–400 · show in text ↑
e7

“while in the roots, higher concentrations were obtained at 50% and 65% of FWC relative to the other soil moisture levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–857 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon application reduced transpiration rate and stomatal conductance of alfalfa.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
Si applicatione6
Outcome
transpiration rate and stomatal conductancee6
Direction
reducede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Alfalfa forage biomass and number of branches increased with increase in soil moisture level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–400 · show in text ↑
e6

“Si application reduced both the transpiration rate and stomatal conductance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–934 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon application had no effect on photosynthetic rate of alfalfa.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
Si applicatione6
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee7
Direction
no effecte7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Alfalfa forage biomass and number of branches increased with increase in soil moisture level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–400 · show in text ↑
e6

“Si application reduced both the transpiration rate and stomatal conductance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–934 · show in text ↑
e7

“but had no effect on photosynthetic rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–975 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The promotive effect of silicon application on alfalfa biomass and water use efficiency is regulated by soil moisture conditions.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
Si applicatione7
Outcome
promotive effect of Si application on biomass and WUEe7
Qualifier
regulated by the soil moisture conditionse7

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Alfalfa forage biomass and number of branches increased with increase in soil moisture level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–400 · show in text ↑
e7

“The results revealed that the promotive effect of Si application on biomass and WUE was regulated by the soil moisture conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1106 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · yield · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

silicon atom · physiology: photosynthesis · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

silicon atom · physiology: water · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

soil water · yield · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.