Paper · 2011 · Evolutionary Applications

Transgenes for insect resistance reduce herbivory and enhance fecundity in advanced generations of crop–weed hybrids of rice

Xiao Yang; Hui Xia; Wei Wang; et al.

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
72
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Gene flow from transgenic crops allows novel traits to spread to sexually compatible weeds. Traits such as resistance to insects may enhance the fitness of weeds, but few studies have tested for these effects under natural field conditions. We created F 2 and F 3 crop-weed hybrid lineages of genetically engineered rice (Oryza sativa) using lines with two transgene constructs, cowpea trypsin inhibitor (CpTI) and a Bt transgene linked to CpTI (Bt/CpTI). Experiments conducted in Fuzhou, China, demonstrated that CpTI alone did not significantly affect fecundity, although it reduced herbivory. In contrast, under certain conditions, Bt/CpTI conferred up to 79% less insect damage and 47% greater fecundity relative to nontransgenic controls, and a 44% increase in fecundity relative to the weedy parent. A small fitness cost was detected in F 3 progeny with Bt/CpTI when grown under low insect pressure and direct competition with transgene-negative controls. We conclude that Bt/CpTI transgenes may introgress into co-occurring weedy rice populations and contribute to greater seed production when target insects are abundant. However, the net fitness benefits that are associated with Bt/CpTI could be ephemeral if insect pressure is lacking, for example, because of widespread planting of Bt cultivars that suppress target insect populations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CpTI did not significantly affect fecundity.

Treatment
CpTI alonee0
Gene
CpTIe0
Outcome
fecunditye0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CpTI alone did not significantly affect fecundity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–563 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrids of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CpTI reduced herbivory.

Treatment
CpTI alonee0
Gene
CpTIe0
Outcome
herbivorye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CpTI alone did not significantly affect fecundity, although it reduced herbivory.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–595 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrids of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bt/CpTI reduced insect damage by up to 79% relative to nontransgenic controls under certain conditions.

Treatment
Bt/CpTIe0
Gene
Bt/CpTIe0
Outcome
insect damagee0
Direction
lesse0
Value
up to 79%e0
Qualifier
under certain conditionse0
Comparator
nontransgenic controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under certain conditions, Bt/CpTI conferred up to 79% less insect damage and 47% greater fecundity relative to nontransgenic controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–742 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrids of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bt/CpTI increased fecundity by 47% relative to nontransgenic controls under certain conditions.

Treatment
Bt/CpTIe0
Gene
Bt/CpTIe0
Outcome
fecunditye0
Direction
greatere0
Value
47%e0
Qualifier
under certain conditionse0
Comparator
nontransgenic controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under certain conditions, Bt/CpTI conferred up to 79% less insect damage and 47% greater fecundity relative to nontransgenic controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–742 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrids of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bt/CpTI increased fecundity by 44% relative to the weedy parent.

Treatment
Bt/CpTIe1
Gene
Bt/CpTIe1
Outcome
fecunditye0
Direction
increasee0
Value
44%e0
Comparator
weedy parente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a 44% increase in fecundity relative to the weedy parent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–804 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrids of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–124 · show in text ↑
e1

“under certain conditions, Bt/CpTI conferred up to 79% less insect damage and 47% greater fecundity relative to nontransgenic controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–742 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bt/CpTI had a small fitness cost in F 3 progeny under low insect pressure and competition with transgene-negative controls.

Organ / stage
F 3 progenye0
Treatment
Bt/CpTIe0
Gene
Bt/CpTIe0
Outcome
fitness coste0
Qualifier
low insect pressure and direct competitione0
Comparator
transgene-negative controlse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A small fitness cost was detected in F 3 progeny with Bt/CpTI when grown under low insect pressure and direct competition with transgene-negative controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–961 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrids of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–124 · show in text ↑

Vigna unguiculata · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 50 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 50 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

Vigna unguiculata · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

transgenic · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

102 papers: 81 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 81 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.