Paper · 1959 · Biologia Plantarum

Humic acids with C14

Silvestr Prát; František Pospíšil

9
claims
9
verbatim quotes
34
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

1. Leaves of sugar-beet (Beta saccharifera), which had assimilated active carbon dioxide C14O2, were subjected to the process of humification in soil. After three to five months of humification the dried soil was extracted with ether-alcohol, then with sodium or potassium hydroxide; the humic acids were separated from fulvic acids with hydrochloric acid. All fractions were radioactive. 2. Maize plants (Zea mays) grown in diluted Knop's solution with the addition of active humic acid showed radioactivity in the roots and leaves. There was, however, a marked difference between the roots and the leaves. While the activity of the roots after two to twelve days was about 100 to 200 cpm., that of the leaves was about 20 cpm. as calculated for one plant, or about 300 cpm./10 g. for roots and at the limits of measurement for leaves. 3. When a drop of solution and suspension of active humic acid was placed on the lower surface of the first leaf, it spread very little even in this leaf; the activity of the second and third leaves was at the limits of measurement after five days; the same applies to the roots. 4. Autoradiograms were fully in keeping with the results obtained with the counter. Roots were clearly marked and more or less intensely, while the leaves did not appear or appeared only as faint shadows. 5. These experiments do not resolve the question of whether unchanged humic acid penetrates into the cells. It can only be concluded, on the basis of these experiments, that if radioactive humic acid is added to water or to nutrient solution, radioactivity appears in the roots and later weakly in the leaves. If it is assumed that the activity measured in the plant organs was caused by humic acid applied direct, this means that it penetrates into the plant slowly, it is not accumulated and spreads throughout the plant slowly from the roots.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All humification fractions of labeled sugar-beet leaves were radioactive.

Taxon
sugar-beet (Beta saccharifera)Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
Organ / stage
Leavese0
Outcome
All fractions were radioactivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaves of sugar-beet (Beta saccharifera), which had assimilated active carbon dioxide C14O2, were subjected to the process of humification in soil. After three to five months of humification the dried soil was extracted with ether-alcohol, then with sodium or potassium hydroxide; the humic acids were separated from fulvic acids with hydrochloric acid. All fractions were radioactive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3–387 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid supplied in nutrient solution yielded more root than leaf radioactivity.

Taxon
Maize plants (Zea mays)Zea mayse0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
addition of active humic acide0
Outcome
activity of the rootse0
Direction
marked differencee0
Value
100 to 200 cpm.e0
Comparator
leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize plants (Zea mays) grown in diluted Knop's solution with the addition of active humic acid showed radioactivity in the roots and leaves. There was, however, a marked difference between the roots and the leaves. While the activity of the roots after two to twelve days was about 100 to 200 cpm., that of the leaves was about 20 cpm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–728 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf radioactivity was about 20 cpm after root exposure to humic acid.

Outcome
leavese0
Value
20 cpm.e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“that of the leaves was about 20 cpm. as calculated for one plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–756 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar applied humic acid spread very little in the first leaf.

Organ / stage
first leafe0
Treatment
a drop of solution and suspension of active humic acide0
Outcome
spreade0
Direction
very littlee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“When a drop of solution and suspension of active humic acid was placed on the lower surface of the first leaf, it spread very little even in this leaf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–990 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After foliar application, activity in second and third leaves and roots was at the measurement limit.

Organ / stage
second and third leavese0
Outcome
activity of the second and third leavese0
Qualifier
at the limits of measurement after five dayse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the activity of the second and third leaves was at the limits of measurement after five days; the same applies to the roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1115 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Autoradiograms agreed with counter results.

Outcome
Autoradiogramse0
Comparator
countere0

Verbatim

e0

“Autoradiograms were fully in keeping with the results obtained with the counter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1199 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Autoradiograms showed strong root marks and faint or absent leaf marks.

Organ / stage
Rootse0
Outcome
Roots were clearly markede0
Comparator
leavese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Roots were clearly marked and more or less intensely, while the leaves did not appear or appeared only as faint shadows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1320 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Radioactivity appeared in roots and later weakly in leaves after humic acid addition.

Treatment
radioactive humic acide0
Outcome
radioactivity appears in the roots and later weakly in the leavese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“if radioactive humic acid is added to water or to nutrient solution, radioactivity appears in the roots and later weakly in the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1630 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Slow penetration and movement without accumulation were conditional interpretations.

Outcome
penetrates into the plant slowlye0
Qualifier
If it is assumed that the activity measured in the plant organs was caused by humic acid applied directe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“If it is assumed that the activity measured in the plant organs was caused by humic acid applied direct, this means that it penetrates into the plant slowly, it is not accumulated and spreads throughout the plant slowly from the roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1632–1866 · show in text ↑