Paper · 2000 · DergiPark (Istanbul University)

The Effects of Different Pruning Methods and Height of Fruit Setting on Plant Growth, Yield and Fruit Quality of Melons Grown in Greenhouses

Nilgün Uygun; Nebahat Sarı

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This research was carried out to determine the effects of different pruning methods and height of fruit setting in greenhouse melon production for two years. The first year, the Makdimon F1 variety was used, the second year Galia H5 F1 and Deltex F1 varieties were also tested. The first year the plants were pruned as (a) young plants were stopped after the second leaf and the strongest branch was left as the main stem (top shoot pruning) and (b) control (non-pruned). In both treatments the heights of fruit setting were 30 and 60 cm. In the second year, two stems and 45 cm fruit setting height also were added. In the first year's experiment, although there were no significant differences between the treatments, top shoot pruning increased the early and total yield compared with the control. A fruit setting height of 60 cm gave better results than 30 cm. In the second year, the best yield was obtained from top shoot pruning with two stems (8.30 kg/m 2 ), followed by top shoot pruning with a single stem (6.92 kg/m 2 ) and the control (6.93 kg/m 2 ). Two stems increased total yield by 20 % compared with a single sitem. The height of fruit setting a affected plant growth, yield and fruit quality parameters. The best result was obtained from the plants with 45- 60 cm fruit setting height.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In the first year, top shoot pruning increased early and total yield compared with the control, although differences between treatments were not significant.

Taxon
MelonsCucumis melot0
Treatment
top shoot pruninge0
Outcome
early and total yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
no significant differences between the treatmentse0
Comparator
the controle0
Setting
Greenhousest0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“although there were no significant differences between the treatments, top shoot pruning increased the early and total yield compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–804 · show in text ↑
t0

“Melons Grown in Greenhouses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A fruit setting height of 60 cm gave better results than 30 cm in the first year.

Taxon
MelonsCucumis melot0
Treatment
fruit setting height of 60 cme0
Outcome
better resultse0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
30 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A fruit setting height of 60 cm gave better results than 30 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–868 · show in text ↑
t0

“Melons Grown in Greenhouses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the second year, the best yield came from top shoot pruning with two stems, 8.30 kg/m2.

Taxon
MelonsCucumis melot0
Treatment
top shoot pruning with two stemse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
beste0
Value
8.30 kg/m 2e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the best yield was obtained from top shoot pruning with two stems (8.30 kg/m 2 ), followed by top shoot pruning with a single stem (6.92 kg/m 2 ) and the control (6.93 kg/m 2 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–1066 · show in text ↑
t0

“Melons Grown in Greenhouses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the second year, top shoot pruning with a single stem yielded 6.92 kg/m2, about the same as the control at 6.93 kg/m2.

Taxon
MelonsCucumis melot0
Treatment
top shoot pruning with a single steme0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0
Value
6.92 kg/m 2e0
Qualifier
6.93 kg/m 2e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the best yield was obtained from top shoot pruning with two stems (8.30 kg/m 2 ), followed by top shoot pruning with a single stem (6.92 kg/m 2 ) and the control (6.93 kg/m 2 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–1066 · show in text ↑
t0

“Melons Grown in Greenhouses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two stems increased total yield by 20% compared with a single stem.

Taxon
MelonsCucumis melot0
Treatment
Two stemse0
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20 %e0
Comparator
a single siteme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two stems increased total yield by 20 % compared with a single sitem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1136 · show in text ↑
t0

“Melons Grown in Greenhouses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit setting height affected plant growth, yield and fruit quality parameters.

Taxon
MelonsCucumis melot0
Treatment
height of fruit settinge0
Outcome
plant growth, yield and fruit quality parameterse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The height of fruit setting a affected plant growth, yield and fruit quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1225 · show in text ↑
t0

“Melons Grown in Greenhouses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–140 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude the best result was obtained with a 45-60 cm fruit setting height.

Taxon
MelonsCucumis melot0
Outcome
best resulte0
Qualifier
45- 60 cm fruit setting heighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The best result was obtained from the plants with 45- 60 cm fruit setting height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1307 · show in text ↑
t0

“Melons Grown in Greenhouses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–140 · show in text ↑

pruning · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.