Intervention effectmodel-written summary

In the second year, top shoot pruning with a single stem yielded 6.92 kg/m2, about the same as the control at 6.93 kg/m2.

A claim from The Effects of Different Pruning Methods and Height of Fruit Setting on Plant Growth, Yield and Fruit Quality of Melons Grown in Greenhouses · 2000

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the second year, top shoot pruning with a single stem yielded 6.92 kg/m2, about the same as the control at 6.93 kg/m2.

Taxon
MelonsCucumis melot0
Treatment
top shoot pruning with a single steme0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0
Value
6.92 kg/m 2e0
Qualifier
6.93 kg/m 2e0
Comparator
the controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the best yield was obtained from top shoot pruning with two stems (8.30 kg/m 2 ), followed by top shoot pruning with a single stem (6.92 kg/m 2 ) and the control (6.93 kg/m 2 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–1066
t0

“Melons Grown in Greenhouses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–140

Title

The Effects of Different Pruning Methods and Height of Fruit Setting on Plant Growth, Yield and Fruit Quality of Melons Grown in Greenhouses

Nilgün Uygun; Nebahat Sarı DergiPark (Istanbul University) 2000

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-e6c2fe89e1008e009b60dbce411e6445e694b7bad024871ca7f5a8d77c52fce3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

pruning · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.