Paper · 2019 · Journal of Experimental Agriculture International

Effects of Fruit Thinning and Main Stem Pruning in Melon Crops

Gleyce Lacerda da Silva; Roberto Cleiton Fernandes Queiroga; Francisco Hevilásio Freire Pereira; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to assess the productivity and quality of a melon crop treated with fruit thinning and main stem pruning under field conditions. Experimental Design: The treatments comprised the amount of fruit thinning in the plant (one, two and without thinning) and the period of main stem pruning (35, 40, 45 and 50 days after transplanting - DAT). The crop was set up in a randomized block design factorial of type 3x4, with five replications. Location and Duration of the Study: The experiment carried out at the Center for Agrifood Science and Technology (CCTA) of the Federal University of Campina Grande (UFCG), Campus Pombal - PB, Brazil, from December 2016 to February 2017. Methodology: The Hopey King hybrid of the Cantaloupe group was cultivated at a spacing of 2.0 x 0.4 m. Results: The plants without thinning of fruits provided lower values ​​of leaf area and fruits of lower mass. However, due to their higher quantity per hectare, the crop total productivity was high. On the other hand, plants with fewer fruits had the highest values ​​of soluble solids, total and non-reducing soluble sugars. The leaf area, fruit mass, total productivity, and the concentration of reducing and non-reducing soluble sugars were higher when the plants were pruned at 35 DAT. Conclusion: The fruit thinning and main stem pruning affected the production and quality of melon fruits significantly. For more demanding markets, we recommend to treat the plants with one or two fruits and prune at 35 days after transplantation, aiming to enhance the quality variables.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Melon plants without fruit thinning had lower leaf area.

Taxon
MelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
without thinning of fruitse1
Outcome
leaf areae1
Direction
lowere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Melon Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“The plants without thinning of fruits provided lower values ​​of leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–884 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Melon plants without fruit thinning produced fruits of lower mass.

Taxon
MelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
without thinning of fruitse1
Outcome
fruits of lower masse1
Direction
lowere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Melon Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“The plants without thinning of fruits provided lower values ​​of leaf area and fruits of lower mass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–909 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Because of the higher number of fruits per hectare, total crop productivity of melon plants without thinning was high.

Taxon
MelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
without thinning of fruitse2
Outcome
crop total productivitye1
Direction
highe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Melon Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“the crop total productivity was high”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–998 · show in text ↑
e2

“The plants without thinning of fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–847 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Melon plants with fewer fruits had the highest soluble solids and total and non-reducing soluble sugars.

Taxon
MelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
fewer fruitse1
Outcome
soluble solids, total and non-reducing soluble sugarse1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Melon Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“plants with fewer fruits had the highest values ​​of soluble solids, total and non-reducing soluble sugars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area, fruit mass and total productivity of melon were higher when plants were pruned at 35 DAT.

Taxon
MelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
pruned at 35 DATe1
Outcome
leaf area, fruit mass, total productivitye1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Melon Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“The leaf area, fruit mass, total productivity, and the concentration of reducing and non-reducing soluble sugars were higher when the plants were pruned at 35 DAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1289 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The concentrations of reducing and non-reducing soluble sugars in melon were higher when plants were pruned at 35 DAT.

Taxon
MelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
pruned at 35 DATe1
Outcome
concentration of reducing and non-reducing soluble sugarse1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Melon Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“The leaf area, fruit mass, total productivity, and the concentration of reducing and non-reducing soluble sugars were higher when the plants were pruned at 35 DAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1289 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit thinning and main stem pruning significantly affected production and quality of melon fruits.

Taxon
melonCucumis meloe1
Treatment
fruit thinning and main stem pruninge1
Outcome
production and quality of melon fruitse1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The fruit thinning and main stem pruning affected the production and quality of melon fruits significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1303–1409 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

For more demanding markets the authors recommend one or two fruits per melon plant and pruning at 35 days after transplantation to enhance quality variables.

Taxon
MelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
one or two fruits and prune at 35 days after transplantatione1
Outcome
quality variablese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Melon Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“we recommend to treat the plants with one or two fruits and prune at 35 days after transplantation, aiming to enhance the quality variables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1439–1578 · show in text ↑

pruning · physiology: osmolytes · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

pruning · growth · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

pruning · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.