Abstract
We used thin-skin melon variety ‘Jinmi No. 1'(Cucumis melo) to study the effects of pruning on plant growth,yield,quality and disease resistance. The pruning treatment consisted of two-vine,three-vine,four-vine and vertical trellis pruning. The results showed that vertical trellis pruning produced the longest vine. Three-vine pruning made the heaviest single fruit weight of 510 grams,70,60 and 100 grams heavier than the vertical trellis pruning,two and four-vine pruning,respectively. Two-vine pruning produced the thickest stem,largest leaf area,highest soluble solid contents and highest total yield. Total yield of two-vine pruning was 3 500.2 kg per 667 m2,which was 15%,8.9% and 2.2% higher than three-vine pruning,four-vine pruning and vertical trellis pruning,respectively. The fruit quality of two-vine pruning was the best with the soluble solid content 15.1%,which was 16.6%,25.8% and 27.8% higher than three-vine,four-vine pruning and vertical trellis pruning,respectively. Plants with two-vine pruning had the best disease resistance.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Vertical trellis pruning produced the longest vine.
- Taxon
- Cucumis melo
.jpg?width=60)
Cucumis meloe1 - Material
- Jinmi No. 1e1
- Treatment
- vertical trellis pruninge0
- Outcome
- vinee0
- Direction
- longeste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“vertical trellis pruning produced the longest vine”
e1“thin-skin melon variety ‘Jinmi No. 1'(Cucumis melo)”
Claim · model-written summary
Three-vine pruning produced the heaviest single fruit, at 510 grams.
- Taxon
- Cucumis meloCucumis meloe1
- Material
- Jinmi No. 1e1
- Treatment
- Three-vine pruninge0
- Outcome
- single fruit weighte0
- Direction
- heavieste0
- Value
- 510 gramse0
- Qualifier
- 70,60 and 100 grams heaviere0
- Comparator
- the vertical trellis pruning,two and four-vine pruninge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Three-vine pruning made the heaviest single fruit weight of 510 grams,70,60 and 100 grams heavier than the vertical trellis pruning,two and four-vine pruning,respectively”
e1“thin-skin melon variety ‘Jinmi No. 1'(Cucumis melo)”
Claim · model-written summary
Two-vine pruning produced the thickest stem and largest leaf area.
- Taxon
- Cucumis meloCucumis meloe1
- Material
- Jinmi No. 1e1
- Treatment
- Two-vine pruninge0
- Outcome
- stem,largest leaf areae0
- Direction
- thickeste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Two-vine pruning produced the thickest stem,largest leaf area,highest soluble solid contents and highest total yield”
e1“thin-skin melon variety ‘Jinmi No. 1'(Cucumis melo)”
Claim · model-written summary
Two-vine pruning gave the highest total yield of 3 500.2 kg per 667 m2.
- Taxon
- Cucumis meloCucumis meloe1
- Material
- Jinmi No. 1e1
- Treatment
- two-vine pruninge0
- Outcome
- Total yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 3 500.2 kg per 667 m2e0
- Qualifier
- 15%,8.9% and 2.2%e0
- Comparator
- three-vine pruning,four-vine pruning and vertical trellis pruninge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Total yield of two-vine pruning was 3 500.2 kg per 667 m2,which was 15%,8.9% and 2.2% higher than three-vine pruning,four-vine pruning and vertical trellis pruning,respectively”
e1“thin-skin melon variety ‘Jinmi No. 1'(Cucumis melo)”
Claim · model-written summary
Two-vine pruning gave the highest soluble solid content, 15.1%.
- Taxon
- Cucumis meloCucumis meloe1
- Material
- Jinmi No. 1e1
- Treatment
- two-vine pruninge0
- Outcome
- soluble solid contente0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 15.1%e0
- Qualifier
- 16.6%,25.8% and 27.8%e0
- Comparator
- three-vine,four-vine pruning and vertical trellis pruninge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The fruit quality of two-vine pruning was the best with the soluble solid content 15.1%,which was 16.6%,25.8% and 27.8% higher than three-vine,four-vine pruning and vertical trellis pruning,respectively”
e1“thin-skin melon variety ‘Jinmi No. 1'(Cucumis melo)”
Claim · model-written summary
Two-vine pruning gave the best disease resistance.
- Taxon
- Cucumis meloCucumis meloe1
- Material
- Jinmi No. 1e1
- Treatment
- two-vine pruninge0
- Outcome
- disease resistancee0
- Direction
- beste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Plants with two-vine pruning had the best disease resistance”
e1“thin-skin melon variety ‘Jinmi No. 1'(Cucumis melo)”
The same questions in other papers
pruning · growth · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →pruning · molecular: metabolites · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →pruning · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.