Paper · 2010 · Jurnal Ilmu Tanah dan Lingkungan

APLIKASI PUPUK ANORGANIK DAN ORGANIK HAYATI PADA BUDIDAYA PADI SRI (System of Rice Intensification)

Muchlis Muhammad Bakrie; Iswandi Anas; Sugiyanta Sugiyanta; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Excessive use of inorganic fertilizers mainly NPK causes soil degradation, environment pollution, decreases production, and reduces soil biological activity. System of rice intensification is one method of rice cultivation. SRI main principles are seed transplanting at young age (7-11 days old), transplanting use single seedling methode, seedlings at wide plant spacing ≥ 25x25 cm, intermittent irrigation and field conditions are not flooded, and reduction of chemical fertilizers and application of organic fertilizer. This research was conducted at Situgede Village, West Bogor District, Bogor. The research design was split plot randomized complete block design with three blocks. Two rice cultivation system as the main plot and five combinations of fertilizer application as sub plot. In the main plot consisted of two rice cultivation which is conventional and SRI while the subplot consisted of five combinations of fertilizer application is no fertilition, 100% inorganic fertilizers (Urea = 250 kg ha-1, SP-36 = 75 kg ha-1 and KCl = 50 kg ha-1), 75% inorganic fertilizers (Urea = 187 kg ha-1, SP-36 = 56.8 kg ha-1 and KCl = 37.5 kg ha-1) + 200 kg of bio-organicfertilizer, 50% inorganic fertilizers (Urea = 125 kg ha-1, SP-36 = 37.5 kg ha-1 and KCl = 25 kg ha-1) + 200 kg of bio-organicfertilizer and 50% inorganic fertilizers (Urea = 125 kg ha-1, SP-36 = 37.5 kg ha-1 and KCl = 25 kg ha-1). The results showed that SRI method produced maximum number of tillers higher that of 25.8 tillers/hill or an increase of 64.33% compared with conventional methods. Wet and dry shoot weight of wet and dry weight of root is greater in successive SRI method of 13.3%, 19.1%, 1.40% and 41.8% compared with the conventional method. The number of productive tillers, grain number/panicle, 1000 grains weight, root wet weight and dry grain at SRI method was higher than those in conventional method respectively 58.6%, 37.0%, 2.50%, 25.1% and 32.6%. The uptake of N and P in the SRI method higher at 72.0% and 100% compared to conventional method. Application 50% inorganic fertilizer + 200 kg bio-organic fertilizer, producing more fresh weight biomass, plant dry weight, wet weight and dry weight, number of productive tillers, 1000 grain weight respectively 13.9%, 42.0%, 49.8%, 74.0%, 10.7% and 2.48% compared with the dosage recommendations dose or 100% inorganic fertilizer. N, P and K uptake at 50% inorganic fertilizer + 200 kg of bio-organic fertilizer treatment higher (55.6%, 66.7% and 46.2%) than the full recommendation dose of inorganic fertilizer. Bio-organic fertilizer can be used as substitute of NPK fertilizer. Keywords : Bio-organic fertilizer, inorganic fertilizer, System of Rice Intensification (SRI)

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The SRI method increased the number of tillers of rice by 64.33% compared with conventional methods.

Treatment
SRI methode1
Outcome
number of tillerse1
Direction
increasee1
Value
64.33%e1
Comparator
conventional methodse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“System of rice intensification is one method of rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–222 · show in text ↑
e1

“SRI method produced maximum number of tillers higher that of 25.8 tillers/hill or an increase of 64.33% compared with conventional methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1566 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The SRI method increased shoot and root weights of rice, with values of 13.3%, 19.1%, 1.40% and 41.8% compared with the conventional method.

Treatment
successive SRI methode2
Outcome
wet and dry shoot weight of wet and dry weight of roote2
Direction
greatere2
Value
13.3%, 19.1%, 1.40% and 41.8%e2
Comparator
conventional methode2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“System of rice intensification is one method of rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–222 · show in text ↑
e2

“Wet and dry shoot weight of wet and dry weight of root is greater in successive SRI method of 13.3%, 19.1%, 1.40% and 41.8% compared with the conventional method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1568–1729 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The SRI method increased the number of productive tillers of rice by 58.6% compared with conventional method.

Treatment
SRI methode3
Outcome
number of productive tillerse3
Direction
highere3
Value
58.6%e3
Comparator
conventional methode3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“System of rice intensification is one method of rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–222 · show in text ↑
e3

“The number of productive tillers, grain number/panicle, 1000 grains weight, root wet weight and dry grain at SRI method was higher than those in conventional method respectively 58.6%, 37.0%, 2.50%, 25.1% and 32.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1731–1945 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The SRI method increased grain number per panicle of rice by 37.0% compared with conventional method.

Treatment
SRI methode3
Outcome
grain number/paniclee3
Direction
highere3
Value
37.0%e3
Comparator
conventional methode3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“System of rice intensification is one method of rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–222 · show in text ↑
e3

“The number of productive tillers, grain number/panicle, 1000 grains weight, root wet weight and dry grain at SRI method was higher than those in conventional method respectively 58.6%, 37.0%, 2.50%, 25.1% and 32.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1731–1945 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The SRI method increased 1000-grain weight of rice by 2.50% compared with conventional method.

Treatment
SRI methode3
Outcome
1000 grains weighte3
Direction
highere3
Value
2.50%e3
Comparator
conventional methode3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“System of rice intensification is one method of rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–222 · show in text ↑
e3

“The number of productive tillers, grain number/panicle, 1000 grains weight, root wet weight and dry grain at SRI method was higher than those in conventional method respectively 58.6%, 37.0%, 2.50%, 25.1% and 32.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1731–1945 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The SRI method increased root wet weight of rice by 25.1% compared with conventional method.

Treatment
SRI methode3
Outcome
root wet weighte3
Direction
highere3
Value
25.1%e3
Comparator
conventional methode3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“System of rice intensification is one method of rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–222 · show in text ↑
e3

“The number of productive tillers, grain number/panicle, 1000 grains weight, root wet weight and dry grain at SRI method was higher than those in conventional method respectively 58.6%, 37.0%, 2.50%, 25.1% and 32.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1731–1945 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The SRI method increased dry grain yield of rice by 32.6% compared with conventional method.

Treatment
SRI methode3
Outcome
dry graine3
Direction
highere3
Value
32.6%e3
Comparator
conventional methode3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“System of rice intensification is one method of rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–222 · show in text ↑
e3

“The number of productive tillers, grain number/panicle, 1000 grains weight, root wet weight and dry grain at SRI method was higher than those in conventional method respectively 58.6%, 37.0%, 2.50%, 25.1% and 32.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1731–1945 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The SRI method increased N and P uptake of rice, by 72.0% and 100%, compared with conventional method.

Treatment
SRI methode4
Outcome
uptake of N and Pe4
Direction
highere4
Value
72.0% and 100%e4
Comparator
conventional methode4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“System of rice intensification is one method of rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–222 · show in text ↑
e4

“The uptake of N and P in the SRI method higher at 72.0% and 100% compared to conventional method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1947–2043 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inorganic fertilizer at 50% plus 200 kg bio-organic fertilizer increased N, P and K uptake of rice by 55.6%, 66.7% and 46.2% compared with the full recommended dose of inorganic fertilizer.

Treatment
50% inorganic fertilizer + 200 kg of bio-organicfertilizere6
Outcome
N, P and K uptakee6
Direction
highere6
Value
55.6%, 66.7% and 46.2%e6
Comparator
full recommendation dose of inorganic fertilizere6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“System of rice intensification is one method of rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–222 · show in text ↑
e6

“N, P and K uptake at 50% inorganic fertilizer + 200 kg of bio-organicfertilizer treatment higher (55.6%, 66.7% and 46.2%) than the full recommendation dose of inorganic fertilizer”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 2378–2558 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-organic fertilizer can be used as a substitute for NPK fertilizer in rice production.

Outcome
substitute of NPK fertilizere7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“System of rice intensification is one method of rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–222 · show in text ↑
e7

“Bio-organic fertilizer can be used as substitute of NPK fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2560–2626 · show in text ↑

irrigation · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

144 papers: 119 positive, 25 negative or no effect

118 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

140 papers more in this group

See all 144 papers →

irrigation · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 222 positive, 69 negative or no effect

221 papers in the same direction as this paper · 62 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

287 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

993 papers: 932 positive, 61 negative or no effect

931 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

989 papers more in this group

See all 993 papers →

irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,171 papers: 906 positive, 265 negative or no effect

905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 201 in the opposite direction · 64 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,167 papers more in this group

See all 1,171 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.