Paper · 2014 · Weed Biology and Management

Characteristics and control of dicamba‐resistant common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album)

Anis Rahman; Trevor James; Michael Trolove

19
claims
35
verbatim quotes
17
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The expansion of atrazine‐resistant Chenopodium album (common lambsquarters) since the 1980s has forced New Zealand's maize‐growers to use an additional postemergence herbicide application. The frequent use of dicamba for this has selected for a common lambsquarters population with reduced sensitivity to dicamba. Initial greenhouse experiments with seeds that had been collected from the plants that survived field applications of dicamba showed that these plants could tolerate ≤1.2 kg ha −1 , fourfold the recommended rate. These dicamba‐resistant plants were morphologically distinct from the susceptible population. The leaves of the resistant plants were less dentate and a lighter shade of green. The resistant plants were shorter, had a lower biomass and growth rate and flowered ≤19 days earlier than the susceptible plants. When grown together in various density ratios, the average biomass of both the susceptible and the resistant plants increased as the number of susceptible plants decreased in the mixture. The field experiments demonstrated that the resistant population tolerated dicamba at ≤2.4 kg ha −1 , eightfold the recommended rate. Postemergence applications of bromoxynil, pyridate, nicosulfuron and mesotrione effectively controlled both populations. Nicosulfuron and mesotrione provided long‐term residual control, with nicosulfuron being more effective on the grass weeds. High rates of dicamba damaged the maize plants, resulting in an increased weed cover and reduced grain yield. The number of viable common lambsquarters seeds in the soil seed bank at the end of the growing season declined in the treatments in which common lambsquarters was controlled effectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dicamba-resistant plants could tolerate dicamba at up to 1.2 kg/ha, fourfold the recommended rate, in greenhouse experiments.

Taxon
Chenopodium albumChenopodium albumt0
Treatment
dicambae1
Outcome
toleratee1
Value
≤1.2 kg ha −1e1
Comparator
the recommended ratee1
Setting
greenhousee1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · TaxonOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“Initial greenhouse experiments with seeds that had been collected from the plants that survived field applications of dicamba showed that these plants could tolerate ≤1.2 kg ha −1 , fourfold the recommended rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–526 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The resistant population tolerated dicamba at up to 2.4 kg/ha, eightfold the recommended rate, in field experiments.

Taxon
Chenopodium albumChenopodium albumt0
Treatment
dicambae2
Outcome
toleratede2
Value
≤2.4 kg ha −1e2
Comparator
the recommended ratee2
Setting
field experimentse2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · TaxonOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–89 · show in text ↑
e2

“The field experiments demonstrated that the resistant population tolerated dicamba at ≤2.4 kg ha −1 , eightfold the recommended rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1155 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistant plants were morphologically distinct from the susceptible population.

Taxon
Chenopodium albumChenopodium albumt0
Outcome
morphologically distincte3
Comparator
susceptible populatione3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · TaxonOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–89 · show in text ↑
e3

“plants were morphologically distinct from the susceptible population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–620 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaves of resistant plants were less dentate and a lighter shade of green.

Taxon
Chenopodium albumChenopodium albumt0
Organ / stage
leavese4
Outcome
less dentate and a lighter shade of greene4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · TaxonOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–89 · show in text ↑
e4

“The leaves of the resistant plants were less dentate and a lighter shade of green”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–703 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistant plants were shorter and had a lower biomass and growth rate than susceptible plants.

Taxon
Chenopodium albumChenopodium albumt0
Outcome
shorter, had a lower biomass and growth ratee5
Direction
lowere5
Comparator
susceptible plantse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · TaxonOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–89 · show in text ↑
e5

“The resistant plants were shorter, had a lower biomass and growth rate and flowered ≤19 days earlier than the susceptible plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–833 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistant plants flowered up to 19 days earlier than susceptible plants.

Taxon
Chenopodium albumChenopodium albumt0
Outcome
flowerede5
Direction
earliere5
Value
≤19 dayse5
Comparator
susceptible plantse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · TaxonOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–89 · show in text ↑
e5

“The resistant plants were shorter, had a lower biomass and growth rate and flowered ≤19 days earlier than the susceptible plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–833 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In mixtures at various density ratios, average biomass of both susceptible and resistant plants increased as the number of susceptible plants decreased.

Taxon
Chenopodium albumChenopodium albumt0
Treatment
various density ratiose6
Outcome
average biomasse6
Direction
increasede6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · TaxonOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–89 · show in text ↑
e6

“When grown together in various density ratios, the average biomass of both the susceptible and the resistant plants increased as the number of susceptible plants decreased in the mixture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–1021 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postemergence applications of bromoxynil effectively controlled both susceptible and resistant populations.

Taxon
Chenopodium albumChenopodium albumt0
Treatment
bromoxynile7
Outcome
controllede7

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · TaxonOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–89 · show in text ↑
e7

“Postemergence applications of bromoxynil, pyridate, nicosulfuron and mesotrione effectively controlled both populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1276 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postemergence applications of pyridate effectively controlled both susceptible and resistant populations.

Taxon
Chenopodium albumChenopodium albumt0
Treatment
pyridatee7
Outcome
controllede7

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · TaxonOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–89 · show in text ↑
e7

“Postemergence applications of bromoxynil, pyridate, nicosulfuron and mesotrione effectively controlled both populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1276 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postemergence applications of nicosulfuron effectively controlled both susceptible and resistant populations.

Taxon
Chenopodium albumChenopodium albumt0
Treatment
nicosulfurone7
Outcome
controllede7

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · TaxonOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–89 · show in text ↑
e7

“Postemergence applications of bromoxynil, pyridate, nicosulfuron and mesotrione effectively controlled both populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1276 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postemergence applications of mesotrione effectively controlled both susceptible and resistant populations.

Taxon
Chenopodium albumChenopodium albumt0
Treatment
mesotrionee7
Outcome
controllede7

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · TaxonOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–89 · show in text ↑
e7

“Postemergence applications of bromoxynil, pyridate, nicosulfuron and mesotrione effectively controlled both populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1276 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nicosulfuron provided long-term residual control of common lambsquarters.

Taxon
Chenopodium albumChenopodium albumt0
Treatment
nicosulfurone1
Outcome
residual controle1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · TaxonOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nicosulfuron and mesotrione provided long‐term residual control, with nicosulfuron being more effective on the grass weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1400 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mesotrione provided long-term residual control of common lambsquarters.

Taxon
Chenopodium albumChenopodium albumt0
Treatment
mesotrionee1
Outcome
residual controle1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · TaxonOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nicosulfuron and mesotrione provided long‐term residual control, with nicosulfuron being more effective on the grass weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1400 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nicosulfuron was more effective than mesotrione on grass weeds.

Taxon
Chenopodium albumChenopodium albumt0
Treatment
nicosulfurone1
Outcome
effective on the grass weedse1
Direction
more effectivee1
Comparator
mesotrionee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · TaxonOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nicosulfuron and mesotrione provided long‐term residual control, with nicosulfuron being more effective on the grass weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1400 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High rates of dicamba damaged maize plants.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Treatment
High rates of dicambae2
Outcome
damaged the maize plantse2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“High rates of dicamba damaged the maize plants, resulting in an increased weed cover and reduced grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1402–1510 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High rates of dicamba increased weed cover in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Treatment
High rates of dicambae2
Interactor
weede2weed
Outcome
weed covere2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“High rates of dicamba damaged the maize plants, resulting in an increased weed cover and reduced grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1402–1510 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High rates of dicamba reduced grain yield of maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Treatment
High rates of dicambae2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
reducede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“High rates of dicamba damaged the maize plants, resulting in an increased weed cover and reduced grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1402–1510 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The number of viable common lambsquarters seeds in the soil seed bank declined where the weed was controlled effectively.

Taxon
common lambsquartersChenopodium albume3
Organ / stage
seedse3
Treatment
controlled effectivelye3
Outcome
number of viable common lambsquarters seeds in the soil seed banke3
Direction
declinede3
Setting
at the end of the growing seasone3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · TaxonOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–89 · show in text ↑
e3

“The number of viable common lambsquarters seeds in the soil seed bank at the end of the growing season declined in the treatments in which common lambsquarters was controlled effectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1512–1698 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Frequent dicamba use selected for a common lambsquarters population with reduced sensitivity to dicamba.

Taxon
common lambsquartersChenopodium albume4
Treatment
frequent use of dicambae4
Outcome
sensitivity to dicambae4
Direction
reducede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · TaxonOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–89 · show in text ↑
e4

“The frequent use of dicamba for this has selected for a common lambsquarters population with reduced sensitivity to dicamba”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 190–313 · show in text ↑

3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxybenzonitrile · control · Chenopodium album (common lambsquarters)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

dicamba · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

dicamba · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

dicamba · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 16 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

mesotrione · control · Chenopodium album (common lambsquarters)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.