Intervention effectmodel-written summary

2,4-D alone then dicamba controlled annual broadleaf weeds similarly to 2,4-D plus residual herbicides.

A claim from Mechanical versus herbicidal strategies for killing a hairy vetch cover crop and controlling weeds in minimum-tillage corn production · 2003

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2,4-D alone then dicamba controlled annual broadleaf weeds similarly to 2,4-D plus residual herbicides.

Treatment
pre-plant 2,4-D alone, followed by dicamba post-emergencee0
Interactor
annual broadleaf weedse0weed
Outcome
annual broadleaf weedse0
Direction
similarlye0
Comparator
2,4-D plus residual herbicidese0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The herbicide treatment with pre-plant 2,4-D alone, followed by dicamba post-emergence, controlled annual broadleaf weeds (the dominant species in these experiments) similarly to treatment with 2,4-D plus residual herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1233
t0

“corn production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–133

Title

Mechanical versus herbicidal strategies for killing a hairy vetch cover crop and controlling weeds in minimum-tillage corn production

John R. Teasdale; Richard C. Rosecrance American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 2003. doi:10.1079/ajaa200240

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-e5d54a11c039014a638619c40ec44dbf65d36b73a52bafbfe971ead919e99c29 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

dicamba · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

2,4-D · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 31 positive, 5 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

herbicide · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

406 papers: 360 positive, 46 negative or no effect

359 papers in the same direction as this claim · 36 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. negative
  8. negative

397 papers more in this group

See all 406 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.