Paper · 2006 · http://www.ag.auburn.edu/auxiliary/nsdl/scasc/Proceedings/2006/buehring.pdf

CORN, COTTON AND SOYBEAN RESPONSE TO REDUCED TILLAGE STALE SEEDBED SYSTEMS

Normie W. Buehring; Mark D. Harrison; Robert R. Dobbs

10
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Studies were conducted to evaluate cotton yield response to tillage systems; and corn and soybean yield response to rotation and tillage. A three-year (2003-2005) tillage study on a Leeper silty clay loam soil in North Mississippi indicated differences between tillage systems but no tillage by year interaction for yield, plant height and number of nodes. No-till had less mid-season height and fewer nodes per plant than the early spring Prepmaster ® bed system, fall bed-roller, fall Paratill ® (10-12 inch depth under-row tillage) + bed-roller and alternating years of fall bed-roller and fall paratill + bed-roller. The fall applied bed-roller and spring applied Prepmaster stale seedbed system yields were 21 to 24 % higher than no-till and equal to the Paratill treatments. A 5-year (2001-2005) study on a Blackland prairie clay soil (Catalpa silty clay loam) indicated no-till corn following no-till soybeans showed a rotation yield response 3 of 5 years with a 5-year average of 21%. There was no added corn yield response from tillage applied to the previous soybean crop. After the first two years (2001 and 2003), subsequent years (2003-2005) showed that no-till yield in both continuous soybeans and in a rotation with no-till corn were equivalent to the fall applied chisel-harrow (one-pass operation) reduced tillage stale seedbed system. However, the fall applied chisel-harrow system for the first 2 years averaged 13 % and 20 % more yield than no-till with continuous soybean and in rotation with no-till corn, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton yield, height and node number differed among tillage systems without a tillage by year interaction.

Outcome
yield, plant height and number of nodese0
Direction
differencese0
Setting
North Mississippie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A three-year (2003-2005) tillage study on a Leeper silty clay loam soil in North Mississippi indicated differences between tillage systems but no tillage by year interaction for yield, plant height and number of nodes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 138–356 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 6–12 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No till cotton had shorter midseason height than the named bed and Paratill systems.

Treatment
No-tille0
Outcome
mid-season heighte0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
early spring Prepmaster ® bed systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No-till had less mid-season height and fewer nodes per plant than the early spring Prepmaster ® bed system, fall bed-roller, fall Paratill ® (10-12 inch depth under-row tillage) + bed-roller and alternating years of fall bed-roller and fall paratill + bed-roller.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–620 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 6–12 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No till cotton had fewer nodes than the named bed and Paratill systems.

Treatment
No-tille0
Outcome
nodes per plante0
Direction
fewere0
Comparator
early spring Prepmaster ® bed systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No-till had less mid-season height and fewer nodes per plant than the early spring Prepmaster ® bed system, fall bed-roller, fall Paratill ® (10-12 inch depth under-row tillage) + bed-roller and alternating years of fall bed-roller and fall paratill + bed-roller.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–620 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 6–12 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fall bed roller cotton yield was 21 to 24% higher than no till.

Treatment
fall applied bed-rollere0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
21 to 24 %e0
Comparator
no-tille0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fall applied bed-roller and spring applied Prepmaster stale seedbed system yields were 21 to 24 % higher than no-till and equal to the Paratill treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–780 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 6–12 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring Prepmaster cotton yield was 21 to 24% higher than no till.

Treatment
spring applied Prepmaster stale seedbed systeme0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
21 to 24 %e0
Comparator
no-tille0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fall applied bed-roller and spring applied Prepmaster stale seedbed system yields were 21 to 24 % higher than no-till and equal to the Paratill treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–780 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 6–12 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No till corn following no till soybeans had a rotation yield response averaging 21%.

Treatment
no-till soybeanse0
Outcome
rotation yield responsee0
Value
21%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no-till corn following no-till soybeans showed a rotation yield response 3 of 5 years with a 5-year average of 21%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–992 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage of the preceding soybean crop gave no added corn yield response.

Treatment
tillage applied to the previous soybean crope0
Outcome
corn yield responsee0
Direction
no addede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no added corn yield response from tillage applied to the previous soybean crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1082 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Later no till soybean yields equaled chisel harrow yields in continuous and rotated systems.

Taxon
soybeansGlycine maxe0
Treatment
no-tille0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
equivalente0
Comparator
fall applied chisel-harrow (one-pass operation) reduced tillage stale seedbed systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“subsequent years (2003-2005) showed that no-till yield in both continuous soybeans and in a rotation with no-till corn were equivalent to the fall applied chisel-harrow (one-pass operation) reduced tillage stale seedbed system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1353 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the first two years chisel harrow raised continuous soybean yield 13% over no till.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
fall applied chisel-harrow systeme0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
moree0
Value
13 %e0
Qualifier
continuous soybeane0
Comparator
no-tille0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the fall applied chisel-harrow system for the first 2 years averaged 13 % and 20 % more yield than no-till with continuous soybean and in rotation with no-till corn, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1542 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the first two years chisel harrow raised soybean yield in corn rotation 20% over no till.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
fall applied chisel-harrow systeme0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
moree0
Value
20 %e0
Qualifier
in rotation with no-till corne0
Comparator
no-tille0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the fall applied chisel-harrow system for the first 2 years averaged 13 % and 20 % more yield than no-till with continuous soybean and in rotation with no-till corn, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1542 · show in text ↑

Glycine max · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

180 papers: 155 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 155 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

176 papers more in this group

See all 180 papers →

tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

390 papers: 264 positive, 126 negative or no effect

125 papers in the same direction as this paper · 264 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

386 papers more in this group

See all 390 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.