Paper · 2015 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Integrated nutrient management for higher yield, quality and profitability of onion (Allium cepa)

SANDEEP SINGH; DHARMESH VERMA; HARENDRA SINGH; et al.

13
claims
23
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during rabi seasons of 2008-09 and 2009-10 at Lakhaoti, Bulandshahr (UP) to study the effect of integrated use of inorganic fertilizer with FYM on yield, uptake of nutrients and economics of onion (Allium cepa L.). The experiment was laid out in randomized block design with ten treatments and three replications. The results revealed that the bulb diameter, scale leaves/bulb, fresh weight of bulb, specific gravity of bulb and bulb yield increased significantly with 150% RD of NPK over control. All the parameters further increased when 10 tonnes FYM/ha was added along with 100% NPK. An additional bulb yield of 2.2 tonnes/ha was realized with 100% NPK + 10 tonnes/ha over 100% NPK alone. Application of 100% NPK + 10 tonnes FYM + 6 kg Zn + 20 kg S/ha produced bulb (36.95 tonnes/ha) and dry matter yield (5.66 tonnes/ha) of onion which was superior to 150% NPK alone (34.08 and 5.22 tonnes/ha). The maximum gross return (Rupees 234 902.5 tonnes/ha), net returns (Rupees 171 085.1/ha) B: C ratio (2.67) and protein yield (368 kg/ha) were obtained with combined use of 100% NPK + FYM + Zn + S. However, the maximum protein content (6.6%) was recorded with 150% NPK application. The uptake of N, P, K, S and Zn by onion bulbs was found to be associated with production of dry matter resulted by the addition of 100% NPK + FYM + Zn + S. The results indicated that combined use of 100% NPK and FYM enriched with Zn and S was the most appropriate nutrient management for higher productivity and profitability of onion.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bulb diameter, scale leaves per bulb and fresh bulb weight of onion increased significantly with 150% RD of NPK over control.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
150% RD of NPKe0
Outcome
bulb diameter, scale leaves/bulb, fresh weight of bulbe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion (Allium cepa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–97 · show in text ↑
e0

“the bulb diameter, scale leaves/bulb, fresh weight of bulb, specific gravity of bulb and bulb yield increased significantly with 150% RD of NPK over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–529 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Specific gravity of bulb and bulb yield of onion increased significantly with 150% RD of NPK over control.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
150% RD of NPKe0
Outcome
specific gravity of bulb and bulb yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion (Allium cepa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–97 · show in text ↑
e0

“the bulb diameter, scale leaves/bulb, fresh weight of bulb, specific gravity of bulb and bulb yield increased significantly with 150% RD of NPK over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–529 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All the measured parameters increased further when 10 tonnes FYM per ha was added along with 100% NPK.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
10 tonnes FYM/ha was added along with 100% NPKe1
Outcome
All the parameterse1
Direction
further increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion (Allium cepa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“All the parameters further increased when 10 tonnes FYM/ha was added along with 100% NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–619 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An additional bulb yield of 2.2 tonnes/ha was obtained with 100% NPK + 10 tonnes/ha FYM over 100% NPK alone.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
100% NPK + 10 tonnes/hae2
Outcome
bulb yielde2
Direction
additionale2
Value
2.2 tonnes/hae2
Comparator
100% NPK alonee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion (Allium cepa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–97 · show in text ↑
e2

“An additional bulb yield of 2.2 tonnes/ha was realized with 100% NPK + 10 tonnes/ha over 100% NPK alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–724 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100% NPK + 10 tonnes FYM + 6 kg Zn + 20 kg S/ha gave a bulb yield of 36.95 tonnes/ha, superior to 150% NPK alone (34.08 tonnes/ha).

Taxon
onionAllium cepae3
Treatment
100% NPK + 10 tonnes FYM + 6 kg Zn + 20 kg S/hae3
Outcome
bulbe3
Direction
superiore3
Value
36.95 tonnes/hae3
Qualifier
34.08e3
Comparator
150% NPK alonee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Application of 100% NPK + 10 tonnes FYM + 6 kg Zn + 20 kg S/ha produced bulb (36.95 tonnes/ha) and dry matter yield (5.66 tonnes/ha) of onion which was superior to 150% NPK alone (34.08 and 5.22 tonnes/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–931 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100% NPK + 10 tonnes FYM + 6 kg Zn + 20 kg S/ha gave a dry matter yield of 5.66 tonnes/ha, superior to 150% NPK alone (5.22 tonnes/ha).

Taxon
onionAllium cepae3
Treatment
100% NPK + 10 tonnes FYM + 6 kg Zn + 20 kg S/hae3
Outcome
dry matter yielde3
Direction
superiore3
Value
5.66 tonnes/hae3
Qualifier
5.22 tonnes/hae3
Comparator
150% NPK alonee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Application of 100% NPK + 10 tonnes FYM + 6 kg Zn + 20 kg S/ha produced bulb (36.95 tonnes/ha) and dry matter yield (5.66 tonnes/ha) of onion which was superior to 150% NPK alone (34.08 and 5.22 tonnes/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–931 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum gross return (Rupees 234 902.5 tonnes/ha) was obtained with combined use of 100% NPK + FYM + Zn + S.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
combined use of 100% NPK + FYM + Zn + Se4
Outcome
gross returne4
Direction
maximume4
Value
Rupees 234 902.5 tonnes/hae4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion (Allium cepa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–97 · show in text ↑
e4

“The maximum gross return (Rupees 234 902.5 tonnes/ha), net returns (Rupees 171 085.1/ha) B: C ratio (2.67) and protein yield (368 kg/ha) were obtained with combined use of 100% NPK + FYM + Zn + S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum net returns (Rupees 171 085.1/ha) were obtained with combined use of 100% NPK + FYM + Zn + S.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
combined use of 100% NPK + FYM + Zn + Se4
Outcome
net returnse4
Direction
maximume4
Value
Rupees 171 085.1/hae4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion (Allium cepa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–97 · show in text ↑
e4

“The maximum gross return (Rupees 234 902.5 tonnes/ha), net returns (Rupees 171 085.1/ha) B: C ratio (2.67) and protein yield (368 kg/ha) were obtained with combined use of 100% NPK + FYM + Zn + S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum B:C ratio (2.67) was obtained with combined use of 100% NPK + FYM + Zn + S.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
combined use of 100% NPK + FYM + Zn + Se4
Outcome
B: C ratioe4
Direction
maximume4
Value
2.67e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion (Allium cepa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–97 · show in text ↑
e4

“The maximum gross return (Rupees 234 902.5 tonnes/ha), net returns (Rupees 171 085.1/ha) B: C ratio (2.67) and protein yield (368 kg/ha) were obtained with combined use of 100% NPK + FYM + Zn + S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum protein yield (368 kg/ha) was obtained with combined use of 100% NPK + FYM + Zn + S.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
combined use of 100% NPK + FYM + Zn + Se4
Outcome
protein yielde4
Direction
maximume4
Value
368 kg/hae4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion (Allium cepa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–97 · show in text ↑
e4

“The maximum gross return (Rupees 234 902.5 tonnes/ha), net returns (Rupees 171 085.1/ha) B: C ratio (2.67) and protein yield (368 kg/ha) were obtained with combined use of 100% NPK + FYM + Zn + S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum protein content (6.6%) of onion was recorded with 150% NPK application.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
150% NPK applicatione5
Outcome
protein contente5
Direction
maximume5
Value
6.6%e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion (Allium cepa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–97 · show in text ↑
e5

“the maximum protein content (6.6%) was recorded with 150% NPK application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1212 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uptake of N, P, K, S and Zn by onion bulbs was associated with dry matter production resulting from addition of 100% NPK + FYM + Zn + S.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
addition of 100% NPK + FYM + Zn + Se6
Outcome
uptake of N, P, K, S and Zne6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion (Allium cepa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–97 · show in text ↑
e6

“The uptake of N, P, K, S and Zn by onion bulbs was found to be associated with production of dry matter resulted by the addition of 100% NPK + FYM + Zn + S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1369 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that combined use of 100% NPK and FYM enriched with Zn and S is the most appropriate nutrient management for higher productivity and profitability of onion.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae7
Outcome
nutrient managemente7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“combined use of 100% NPK and FYM enriched with Zn and S was the most appropriate nutrient management for higher productivity and profitability of onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1398–1549 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

36 papers: 33 positive, 3 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
    FYM, NPK and sulfur, with or without boron and zinc, gave maximum bulb weight.

    Response of Onion to NPK, S and Micronutrients · 2020

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

fertilization · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

530 papers: 464 positive, 66 negative or no effect

463 papers in the same direction as this paper · 59 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

526 papers more in this group

See all 530 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.